Senator Hillary Clinton: "We are engaged in a war against heartless, ruthless enemies. If they could come after us again tomorrow, they would"

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

A Democratic party activist in Iowa who claims to have chatted with Senator Clinton about her being a hawk - http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/1/27/222112/149

Of course, he could be lying.

[garya505 2]

phased redeployment = cut and run

[Robor007 0]

My concern with Clinton or Obama getting the Dem nomination is either one would be the first ever nominated. How would the average joe & jane deal with it?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

She [Hillary] has no chance.

Man, don't I hope you're right. She better be ditched during the first few primaries. She'd be a nightmare of a President sputtering such nonsense. Almost sounds like Hillary W...

Exactly the last thing the US needs after George Bush Jr is a Margaret Thatcher.

[dalegg 143]

You guys are nuts. Hillary will get the nomination.

[Scott & Lai 12]

My concern with Clinton or Obama getting the Dem nomination is either one would be the first ever nominated. How would the average joe & jane deal with it?

I must not hang around the "average Joe & Jane," as I've not actually met anyone whose reason for being against those two is their gender or color.

[Ban Hammer 14,713]

phased redeployment = cut and run

the new pc term for it.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Hillary wants the Republican vote - so its no surprise that she pulls out the slogans. Yet another reason why, like Bush, I wouldn't trust her as far as I could kick her.

And for the record "Cut and Run" is a slogan. In fact, for the several years slogans have masqueraded as Iraq policy - "Stay the Course" in particular has been used as an excuse to do nothing, and it seems there's a broad consensus now that the original policy up wasn't so much about sticking to a specific, meticulously planned, long term strategy as much as it was about treading water and refusing to admit that significant mistakes were made. Donald Rumsfeld "quit" after all (which in politics more often means fired than resigned).

[dalegg 143]

My concern with Clinton or Obama getting the Dem nomination is either one would be the first ever nominated. How would the average joe & jane deal with it?

I must not hang around the "average Joe & Jane," as I've not actually met anyone whose reason for being against those two is their gender or color.

I don't think it would matter in California, because we are going to give our electorals to whatever democrat gets the nomination. What Dems have to be concerned with are battleground states, like Florida and Ohio.

Florida has never elected an African American Governor or U.S Senator, nor woman Governor. The only Female Senator they ever elected was a Rebublican.

The same goes for Ohio. No African American U.S Senators or Governors, no Female U.S Senators, and the only woman ever serving as Governor there was a Republican who was not elected.

In fact, the second African American Governor EVER was just elected- and to one of the most liberal states of all- Massachusetts. That's got to say something.

I think there is probably more bias hidden in the back of people's minds than you think. No, we don't see it so much in California, but looking at the voting records of Americans in the past, it wouldn't suprise me if they Gave one of the leading Republicans a closer look than they would if say John Edwards was running against them.

[yogib37 3]

Hillary wants the Republican vote - so its no surprise that she pulls out the slogans. Yet another reason why, like Bush, I wouldn't trust her as far as I could kick her.

Yes I agree with you. I would not or do not trust Hillary. She is very crafty and very sneaky. She I would consider a snake. She may get the Democract Nom. But She wont win the general vote and I sure wont vote for her.

Yogi