WH Spokesman: Administration's Foreign Policy Has Improved 'Tranquility Of The Global Community' - (title edited)

[UncleBeer 244]

If you want present day flip flops you will have to wait and see if Romney runs for President in 2016.

Mmmm, no. If you want present day flipflops, look to the preznit.

And you're obviously not.

Oh. Got me. You're just so glib and quick-witted.

[BatmanUSA 105]

Or it proves how pathetic the Republican's have become that even a disaster like Obama got re-elected. The choices were bad and worse.

I agree, but if given the choice between 2 evils, go for the one you never did before...

[GandD 5,966]

I think most rational people realize the two parties are a choice between two evils.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

I think most rational people realize the two parties are a choice between two evils.

I think you would be shocked how few of us here realize that

[BatmanUSA 105]

I do believe that the National debt has increased more under Obama.

As the debt continues to rise, I do not think anything will change, either party will just raise taxes and/or print more money, and/or continue to borrow more.

Politicians are happy with the way things are. They have guaranteed retirement payments and guaranteed great free healthcare for life.. These are probably the 2 most important things all people want when they retire. But these necessities are reserved only for the politicians..

The affordable Care Act/Obamacare, obviously did not make healthcare affordable... It might have been better if the Dems and Repubs collaborated and presented a comprehensive affordable health plan for Americans. However, the Dems had a majority in the house and senate and they gave us Obamacare without a single Repub vote.. The Dems could have passed ANYTHING, but they gave us Obamacare, this is why I give 100% of the blame to the Dems... then Obama went into campaign mode and willfully lied to the American people about it. Unfortunately the majority of Americans believed his lies so he was reelected. They supported it and then they found out what was in it so now the majority does not like it but we are stuck with it.

The Repubs were against it but now they are suing the President because he issued executive orders to alter the law and delay parts of its implementation. That doesn't make any sense, on the surface, but if you try to understand that the Repubs are demanding that Obamacare be implemented as the law it was approved as, you can see they are trying to get Obamacare up and running so everyone can see what is in it and see how F'ed up the law really is..

The whole situation is a perfect example of how partisan politics can destroy this country.

Some people say the Repubs are the party of "NO", Sure they had no alternative plan, but in the case of healthcare reform, saying no was better than voting for Obamacare.. and the Repubs continued to say No as the Dems attempted to piece-meal fix Obamacare, they wanted a complete repeal and then they said they would discuss other options... Which probably would have ended up with nothing being done.

what was this topic about.?? Oh, Foreign policy...

Can anyone cite an example of a successful foreign policy under Obama.
(excluding the killing of Bin Laden, Obama made it quite clear that this was his operation and it was executed thru his orders. Although he failed to mention that the intelligence and leg work was started during the Bush administration and that information obtained thru water-boarding (which Obama was opposed to) gave us the information we needed..)

[spookyturtle 9,466]

I think you would be shocked how few of us here realize that

Except you and I, of course.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I do believe that the National debt has increased more under Obama.

That's what you believe. The fact, on the other hand, is that the debt almost tripled under Reagan, it more than doubled under Bush Jr. It will not double, let alone triple under Obama. Perspective is a beautiful thing. Get some.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

That's what you believe. The fact, on the other hand, is that the debt almost tripled under Reagan, it more than doubled under Bush Jr. It will not double, let alone triple under Obama. Perspective is a beautiful thing. Get some.

Put down the pipe and back away. Facts are those Pesky things that get in the way of your blind allegiance to the left.

Reagan and Bush in the same reply. Holy 2-A's in the same post.

Scott Walker says debt projected to double under Obama

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2013/nov/13/scott-walker/scott-walker-says-debt-projected-double-under-obam/

Did Barack Obama accrue more debt in half the time as George Bush?

"Under President Bush in eight years, we added $4.9 trillion to the debt. Under President Obama, we've added $5.3 trillion to the debt in the 3.5 years he's been in office."

http://www.politifact.com/new-hampshire/statements/2012/sep/05/kelly-ayotte/did-barack-obama-accrue-more-debt-half-time-george/

[JohnR! 5,495]

Put down the pipe and back away. Facts are those Pesky things that get in the way of your blind allegiance to the left.

Reagan and Bush in the same reply. Holy 2-A's in the same post.

Scott Walker says debt projected to double under Obama

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2013/nov/13/scott-walker/scott-walker-says-debt-projected-double-under-obam/

Did Barack Obama accrue more debt in half the time as George Bush?

"Under President Bush in eight years, we added $4.9 trillion to the debt. Under President Obama, we've added $5.3 trillion to the debt in the 3.5 years he's been in office."

http://www.politifact.com/new-hampshire/statements/2012/sep/05/kelly-ayotte/did-barack-obama-accrue-more-debt-half-time-george/

Bush increased the country's debt by 92% and Obama so far 50%. How much did Bush spend to service the debt? How much is costing us to service it now? Consider rading more on the subject, perhaps starting with the copy under the links you posted, in haste no doubt.

On a separate note, I can only hope it is your wife who takes care of your household finances...

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Bush increased the country's debt by 92% and Obama so far 50%. How much did Bush spend to service the debt? How much is costing us to service it now? Consider rading more on the subject, perhaps starting with the copy under the links you posted, in haste no doubt.

On a separate note, I can only hope it is your wife who takes care of your household finances...

I rad plenty

ROFl

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Bush increased the country's debt by 92% and Obama so far 50%. How much did Bush spend to service the debt? How much is costing us to service it now? Consider rading more on the subject, perhaps starting with the copy under the links you posted, in haste no doubt.

On a separate note, I can only hope it is your wife who takes care of your household finances...

In 5.5 years Obama has grown the National debt by approx 7.6 trillion

The 8 years Bush grew the Debt about 5.1 trillion

One number is more than the other.. Can you tell me which one ?

Bush Grew the debt about .63 Trillion per year

Obama about 1.3

One number is almost twice the other number. Can you tell me which one

I want to believe you are smarter than a 5th grader.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

In 5.5 years Obama has grown the National debt by approx 7.6 trillion

The 8 years Bush grew the Debt about 5.1 trillion

One number is more than the other.. Can you tell me which one ?

Bush Grew the debt about .63 Trillion per year

Obama about 1.3

One number is almost twice the other number. Can you tell me which one

I want to believe you are smarter than a 5th grader.

Do I have to spell it out for everyone? Bush deficit = bad. Obama deficit = good. Obama's trillions went toward the good of the country, Bush's didn't. Bush wasted his trillions, every cent of Obama's was wisely spent. Bush spent his trillions first, so no matter how much any future President spends, it's still Bush's fault because he started it. Two wrongs make a right. Only one party has ever wasted money, according to the members of the other party.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Do I have to spell it out for everyone? Bush deficit = bad. Obama deficit = good. Obama's trillions went toward the good of the country, Bush's didn't. Bush wasted his trillions, every cent of Obama's was wisely spent. Bush spent his trillions first, so no matter how much any future President spends, it's still Bush's fault because he started it. Two wrongs make a right. Only one party has ever wasted money, according to the members of the other party.

Spooks I swear I think you are the only other person at times that get's it. I wasn't trying to make a point about Obama or Bush either really, just trying to get them to admit to one indisputable fact. . What was totally amazing is that the blind obama supporters are so blind, they can't just come out and admit, he has run up the national debt worse than Bush. The same exact thing many of them gave Bush hell for. They are just as bad in another direction as the crowd, that will not acknowledge Obama deserves credit for the bin Laden thing.

[DavenRoxy 1,073]

I am sure you believe so.

Do you believe so?

I gave the answer the question merited.

So you purposely answer questions incorrectly? That's a different technique...

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Spooks I swear I think you are the only other person at times that get's it. I wasn't trying to make a point about Obama or Bush either really, just trying to get them to admit to one indisputable fact. . What was totally amazing is that the blind obama supporters are so blind, they can't just come out and admit, he has run up the national debt worse than Bush. The same exact thing many of them gave Bush hell for. They are just as bad in another direction as the crowd, that will not acknowledge Obama deserves credit for the bin Laden thing.

There are a lot of lunatic fringe members for both sides.