AZ SB 1070

[bigdog 376]

On the legislative front, a divided Supreme Court of the U.S. delivered its Opinion on the constitutional validity of 4 contentious provisions of the Arizona Immigration Law- SB1070 (Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act), striking down 3 provisions of the controversial law as being unconstitutional. However, the Supreme Court has declined, at this time, to block the most infamous provision of the law providing that officers who conduct a stop, detention, or arrest must, in some circumstances, make efforts to verify the person’s immigration status with the Federal Government - the “papers please” law. The Supreme Court said it was too early to rule on the constitutionality of the law without seeing the effects of the law.

[JimVaPhuong 4,863]

On the legislative front, a divided Supreme Court of the U.S. delivered its Opinion on the constitutional validity of 4 contentious provisions of the Arizona Immigration Law- SB1070 (Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act), striking down 3 provisions of the controversial law as being unconstitutional. However, the Supreme Court has declined, at this time, to block the most infamous provision of the law providing that officers who conduct a stop, detention, or arrest must, in some circumstances, make efforts to verify the person’s immigration status with the Federal Government - the “papers please” law. The Supreme Court said it was too early to rule on the constitutionality of the law without seeing the effects of the law.

Just a little curious...

This decision was issued by the Supreme Court back in June. Has something changed since then?

[bigdog 376]

Just a little curious...

This decision was issued by the Supreme Court back in June. Has something changed since then?

I saw it and thought i would get it out seems so many here cant read or do any research, that posting it might spike some curiosity to do a little more reading. I hope you and your family are well.