What's with all this sex talk?

[Amby 490]

I don't know how much longer I can watch this without just telling him. I'm too nice

[^_^ 5,021]

(who would have thought this is how this thread would end?)

[Marilyn. 340]

I didn't see a problem with the sentence at first but then I saw it..

Edited July 29, 2010 by Marilyn.

[IndigoSkies 168]

Amby and Madhouse have given you more hints. You can do it.

Amby's posting here? I placed her on Ignore so I can't see what's she's saying.

I have to go now. I'll check back later if you decide to rewrite the sentences. Otherwise, good night.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Can you wait few minutes more?

[Peikko 1,575]

I'm not, never have been. I have never asked someone their views on abortion, because it's a personal decision that goes well beyond a messageboard conversation. I've been vocal about my own views, but that's different.

Don't put words in my mouth.

Furthermore 'do you masturbate and how' is hardly an ethical question. It's quite beyond polite and civilized conversation.

Misunderstanding or misrepresentation; I did not ask people how they masturbate, I asked imen if they use porn or not when they masturbate under specific circumstances.. I am suire you are smart enough to understand how the question, within its specific context related to the ethical questions that were being discussed. You may find that improper and uncivilized but doing so is not based on a rational argument. Asking people how they masturbate would be a lot more controversial and would not have an ethical dimension - for all I know such a question might be against the TOS.

[^_^ 5,021]

Amby's posting here? I placed her on Ignore so I can't see what's she's saying.

I have to go now. I'll check back later if you decide to rewrite the sentences. Otherwise, good night.

Good night.

Misunderstanding or misrepresentation; I did not ask people how they masturbate, I asked imen if they use porn or not when they masturbate under specific circumstances.. I am suire you are smart enough to understand how the question, within its specific context related to the ethical questions that were being discussed. You may find that improper and uncivilized but doing so is not based on a rational argument. Asking people how they masturbate would be a lot more controversial and would not have an ethical dimension - for all I know such a question might be against the TOS.

Don't mind Lisa, she always gets pissed at content like this.

Edited July 29, 2010 by Legacy member

[Amby 490]

If you put someone on ignore can't you still see they've posted? It says "you chose to ignore this person" or something?

[^_^ 5,021]

If you put someone on ignore can't you still see they've posted? It says "you chose to ignore this person" or something?

He can still read your posts if he chooses to.

[IndigoSkies 168]

Good night, loser.

Goodnight, monkey fvcker. Now I'm insulting you.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Who bothers to use that feature. It's like sticking fingers in your ears and going lalala.

[Amby 490]

I didn't see a problem with the sentence at first but then I saw it..

that's because our minds rock! they fill in the blanks and we read things how they're supposed to be even if they're not really that way.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

[^_^ 5,021]

Goodnight, monkey fvcker. Now I'm insulting you.

Run along, kiddo.

[Peikko 1,575]

Well, it doesn't take a psychic, Madam Cleo, to figure out exactly what some threads are about by their titles....

Then again-some threads start of about one thing and end up being a showcase for some people's sexuality.

That's what I said before.

No, it does not take a psychic, but it does take reading the thread. You know the adage, do not judge a book by its cover?

I think most salacious comment I read was along the lines of someone saying they liked sex.