Jump to content

62 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

You have read way more into this thread than was ever intended. But go ahead and argue your case. I'm not arguing it with you. It's a waste of time.

Avoid the original point about this particular headline if it helps you feel superior. I can afford your disdain. It costs me nothing.

I have read into it, yes. I was trying to get at the subtext when somebody throws out a post that asserts something without arguing it or elaborating it. The only case I've really argued is the need for a better example, because the topic of language manipulation is quite interesting and I hoped that's where we were going. The "original point about this particular headline" assumed everyone was on the same page, but it became clear quickly that the example wasn't working.

If you don't want to respond to the substance of my thoughts, just move on.

owl.jpg

I-129F Sent : 2010-02-01

I-129F NOA1 : 2010-02-08

I-129F NOA2 : 2010-03-12

NVC Received : 2010-03-18

NVC Left : 2010-03-22

Consulate Received : 2010-04-12

Packet 3 Received : 2010-04-14

Packet 3 Sent : 2010-04-16 (logged 2010-04-27)

Packet 4 Received : 2010-04-29

Interview Date : 2010-06-02

Interview Result : APPROVED!!!!!!

Visa in hand: 2010-06-09

POE: 2010-06-11

We is married now!: 2010-06-24

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Off topic, while I do enjoy the high caliber of your posts, I am interested in what field you specialize in.

Thanks! I'm a writer and editor and natural therapeutic specialist, which means I use things like craniosacral and neuromuscular therapy to help people who have migraines and head/neck injuries and stuff.

owl.jpg

I-129F Sent : 2010-02-01

I-129F NOA1 : 2010-02-08

I-129F NOA2 : 2010-03-12

NVC Received : 2010-03-18

NVC Left : 2010-03-22

Consulate Received : 2010-04-12

Packet 3 Received : 2010-04-14

Packet 3 Sent : 2010-04-16 (logged 2010-04-27)

Packet 4 Received : 2010-04-29

Interview Date : 2010-06-02

Interview Result : APPROVED!!!!!!

Visa in hand: 2010-06-09

POE: 2010-06-11

We is married now!: 2010-06-24

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Don't most OT posters have serious head injuries, or post as though they do?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted (edited)

This was the first headline I saw when I opened my yahoo account to the "What's New" page.

Ariz. Gov. Brewer wants separating fence completed

Separating fence? :rofl: Those editors must not think much of their readers' intelligence to use such obviously loaded language and expect them to not see through it. But they aren't biased or anything. :no:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100604/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_arizona_governor

Edited by _Simpson_
Posted

Thanks! I'm a writer and editor and natural therapeutic specialist, which means I use things like craniosacral and neuromuscular therapy to help people who have migraines and head/neck injuries and stuff.

Interesting, my cousin is an osteopath so I have heard of the first but not the latter.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

I have never hard of such term prior to this article, yet I can say I proactively follow the news regarding such stories. This is no different from those labeling illegal aliens undocumented migrants. It's manipulation that at the very least is disingenuous and the worst is a cunning attempt to sway people from reality.

Yes, that's the conversation. I still don't think this is a strong example though. Can you think of any others that support your position? I can only think of ones that support the notion that conservatives are quite organized and skilled in this arena of "reality manipulation."

The next part is, how do we decide what reality is? Not a metaphysical question. But we can't just assert a fixed, unassailable "reality" and then argue out from it without describing its contours. Your definition is going to be different from mine, and there may well be no true north hanging out somewhere in the middle, waiting to be revealed. This is sort of a problem.

owl.jpg

I-129F Sent : 2010-02-01

I-129F NOA1 : 2010-02-08

I-129F NOA2 : 2010-03-12

NVC Received : 2010-03-18

NVC Left : 2010-03-22

Consulate Received : 2010-04-12

Packet 3 Received : 2010-04-14

Packet 3 Sent : 2010-04-16 (logged 2010-04-27)

Packet 4 Received : 2010-04-29

Interview Date : 2010-06-02

Interview Result : APPROVED!!!!!!

Visa in hand: 2010-06-09

POE: 2010-06-11

We is married now!: 2010-06-24

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Don't most OT posters have serious head injuries, or post as though they do?

Yes, I'm trying to extend my practice. But you know, I'm here, so... physician heal thyself.

owl.jpg

I-129F Sent : 2010-02-01

I-129F NOA1 : 2010-02-08

I-129F NOA2 : 2010-03-12

NVC Received : 2010-03-18

NVC Left : 2010-03-22

Consulate Received : 2010-04-12

Packet 3 Received : 2010-04-14

Packet 3 Sent : 2010-04-16 (logged 2010-04-27)

Packet 4 Received : 2010-04-29

Interview Date : 2010-06-02

Interview Result : APPROVED!!!!!!

Visa in hand: 2010-06-09

POE: 2010-06-11

We is married now!: 2010-06-24

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
my cousin is an osteopath
If your cousin is flimflammed on rare occasion only, is he "the osteopath less taken," si man?

physician heal thyself.
Shouldn't podiatrists heel themselves, specifically?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Interesting, my cousin is an osteopath so I have heard of the first but not the latter.

Nerve systems develop "habits" or patterns of impulse that produce pain even when there is no longer any useful purpose to that pain. Neuromuscular therapy is comprised of a group of very specific manipulations that untangle the faulty wiring that's been set up after long periods of muscular and skeletal distortion, sort of erasing the memory of the nerve circuits so the body can respond to what's actually happening, not what's been before. Reality!

owl.jpg

I-129F Sent : 2010-02-01

I-129F NOA1 : 2010-02-08

I-129F NOA2 : 2010-03-12

NVC Received : 2010-03-18

NVC Left : 2010-03-22

Consulate Received : 2010-04-12

Packet 3 Received : 2010-04-14

Packet 3 Sent : 2010-04-16 (logged 2010-04-27)

Packet 4 Received : 2010-04-29

Interview Date : 2010-06-02

Interview Result : APPROVED!!!!!!

Visa in hand: 2010-06-09

POE: 2010-06-11

We is married now!: 2010-06-24

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
Nerve systems develop "habits" or patterns of impulse that produce pain even when there is no longer any useful purpose to that pain.
Many OT threads = pain without purpose, si man.
...very specific manipulations that untangle the faulty wiring ... after long periods of ... distortion, sort of erasing the memory...
Many people would instead opt for the shortcut of drinking immediately & heavily, si man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

If your cousin is flimflammed on rare occasion only, is he "the osteopath less taken," si man?

Shouldn't podiatrists heel themselves, specifically?

I love everything about these two separate collections of words. But it does not escape me that you're trying to steer the conversation back to Robert Frost. Which, on second thought, is the best possible place it could go. More please.

owl.jpg

I-129F Sent : 2010-02-01

I-129F NOA1 : 2010-02-08

I-129F NOA2 : 2010-03-12

NVC Received : 2010-03-18

NVC Left : 2010-03-22

Consulate Received : 2010-04-12

Packet 3 Received : 2010-04-14

Packet 3 Sent : 2010-04-16 (logged 2010-04-27)

Packet 4 Received : 2010-04-29

Interview Date : 2010-06-02

Interview Result : APPROVED!!!!!!

Visa in hand: 2010-06-09

POE: 2010-06-11

We is married now!: 2010-06-24

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
I love everything about these two separate collections of words.
Thank you, si man.
But it does not escape me that you're trying to steer the conversation back to Robert Frost.
It's 80 degrees outside, so no Frost here, no man.
More please.
Uh, let's si, man:

Byron, Wordsworth, Keats, & Shelley

all give me a big pain in the belly (si, man).

They weren't bright, nor gay, nor dapper;

they never made Phi Beter Kapper (no, man).

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

Yes, that's the conversation. I still don't think this is a strong example though. Can you think of any others that support your position? I can only think of ones that support the notion that conservatives are quite organized and skilled in this arena of "reality manipulation."

The next part is, how do we decide what reality is? Not a metaphysical question. But we can't just assert a fixed, unassailable "reality" and then argue out from it without describing its contours. Your definition is going to be different from mine, and there may well be no true north hanging out somewhere in the middle, waiting to be revealed. This is sort of a problem.

I believe the aforementioned about undocumented immigrants was an excellent example. Prior to moving to the US, I had not heard of this term. The point of that example is that by changing the classification of someone, their conduct and public perception is altered. After all, there is a reason why political slogans and cliches have a great power to influence people in the US. Whereas, the same tools and strategies are almost non-existent in political campaigns in countries like AUS. My first federal election here was quite a bizarre and surreal experience, illustrating Americans are gullible to mere wording.

Reality is common sense for most. For example, someone who has not entered a country using legal channels is not merely some undocumented worker/migrant. Otherwise why not allow me to perform open heart-surgery and have me claim I am simply an undocumented surgeon. In reality, such a label does not sound the same as being told I am not a doctor.

First world countries do not allow opinion or ambiguity to guide a country alone. Otherwise as is the case in the US, nothing would be ever done or accomplished. With so many opinions and such a reliance on them, America has a classic case of too many Chiefs and not enough Indians.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Many OT threads = pain without purpose, si man.Many people would instead opt for the shortcut of drinking immediately & heavily, si man.

On that note...I'm off to see about a beer and a dreamless sleep. Thanks for bringing the funny.

owl.jpg

I-129F Sent : 2010-02-01

I-129F NOA1 : 2010-02-08

I-129F NOA2 : 2010-03-12

NVC Received : 2010-03-18

NVC Left : 2010-03-22

Consulate Received : 2010-04-12

Packet 3 Received : 2010-04-14

Packet 3 Sent : 2010-04-16 (logged 2010-04-27)

Packet 4 Received : 2010-04-29

Interview Date : 2010-06-02

Interview Result : APPROVED!!!!!!

Visa in hand: 2010-06-09

POE: 2010-06-11

We is married now!: 2010-06-24

Posted

If your cousin is flimflammed on rare occasion only, is he "the osteopath less taken," si man?

"Si man?" Why do you keep on asking if people are a member of the Smithsonian Institute and asking if they are a man?

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...