Jump to content

5 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Laura Derbigney tries to bring a little of her Hispanic upbringing into her family life.

"I like to shop at Hispanic-owned stores," she said. "I make tacos, I make enchiladas, I make flautas."

But not on the weekends, according to a court order.

She can't prepare pork or other traditional foods on weekends. She can't drive or use electricity on Saturdays. In fact, a judge has mandated that this Hispanic Catholic from Chicago follow Orthodox Jewish restrictions during the Sabbath.

The reason? Her new husband, recently divorced from a strictly observant Jewish woman. A divorce court has ruled that the seven-year-old son of that marriage must live an Orthodox lifestyle even while in the care of his father and step-mother, according to an NBC Chicago report.

(Scroll down for an interview with Ms. Derbigney.)

The boy's mother has even asked that Derbigney and her husband buy the boy's food from a specific grocery store, on suspicion that he was fed a non-kosher hot dog at his father's house.

Story continues below

Joel Brodsky, Derbigney's attorney, is incensed. From NBC:

"Just because you're divorced, the court can't say how to live your lives or what grocery store you can go to," Brodsky said. "The next step is going to be a Muslim father with custody. During the next visitation, is the mother going to have to wear a burka? That's where we're heading. Divorce courts have to stop getting in the way of religion."

If the case and its lawyer sound oddly familiar, it's because they are. Strangely enough, this is the second case this year of a Chicago custody dispute involving a Jewish mother and a Hispanic Catholic.

Brodsky was also the attorney for Joseph Reyes, a father whose Jewish ex-wife demanded that he not take their daughter to church after he baptized the girl without her mother's knowledge. A judge issued a restraining order preventing him from taking her to church, which he violated. In the final ruling, Reyes was allowed to bring his daughter to worship with him.

In this more recent case, neither of the seven-year-old boy's biological parents could speak to the press due to a gag order.

But Laura Derbigney asked the one question that drove straight to the heart of the problem:

"What about my culture in this? What about my husband's culture?"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/18/court-forces-hispanic-cat_n_580231.html

wth, I don't know how that "your request is being processed" got into the title. :lol:

If a mod is able to remove that, feel free.

Edited by trillium13
24q38dy.jpg
Posted (edited)

That's par for the course in divorces processed by the US court system.

Unfortunately the norm is to crush the father until he looks like

a gelatenous pulp spit out by a Gozzilla-knockoff B-movie monster.

If the kid is in the father's custody the kid is in the father's custody.

If the kid is in the mother's custody, it seems okay that she

only ask for money but not give even the slightest hint that

the kids are actually alive. My ex is of the opinion that she

just merely has to wish something to get the court to agree.

As far as my rights that are in the divorce agreement,

they don't actually exist in reality.

What about when the kid is in the mom's custody, does he

get Christmas presents and have a decorated tree prominently

in the living room? Fairness is never an issue in US divorces.

Fuçk you and have a nice day!biggrin.gif

Finished my rant. I'll go back to my corner and take a seat...whistling.gif

Edited by thongd4me

02/2003 - Met

08/24/09 I-129F; 09/02 NOA1; 10/14 NOA2; 11/24 interview; 11/30 K-1 VISA (92 d); 12/29 POE 12/31/09 Marriage

03/29/-04/06/10 - AOS sent/rcd; 04/13 NOA1; AOS 2 NBC

04/14 $1010 cashed; 04/19 NOA1

04/28 Biom.

06/16 EAD/AP

06/24 Infops; AP mail

06/28 EAD mail; travel 2 BKK; return 07/17

07/20/10 interview, 4d. b4 I-129F anniv. APPROVAL!*

08/02/10 GC

08/09/10 SSN

2012-05-16 Lifting Cond. - I-751 sent

2012-06-27 Biom,

2013-01-10 7 Mo, 2 Wks. & 5 days - 10 Yr. PR Card (no interview)

*2013-04-22 Apply for citizenship (if she desires at that time) 90 days prior to 3yr anniversary of P. Residence

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...