How to control people

[PhiLandShiR 18]

HOW TO CONTROL PEOPLE

By Charley Reese, King Features columnist

The first principle of people control is not to let them know you are controlling them. If people knew, this knowledge would breed resentment and possibly rebellion, which would then require brute force and terror -- an old-fashioned, expensive and not 100% certain method of control.

Here are a few tips on how smart people can control other people. If any of this rings a bell, well, then wake up! It is easier than you think to control people indirectly, to manipulate them into thinking what you want them to think and doing what you want them to do. One basic technique is to keep them ignorant. Educated people are not as easy to manipulate. Abolishing public education or restricting access to education would be the direct approach. That would spill the beans. The indirect approach is to control the education they receive.

It's possible to be a Ph.D., doctor, lawyer, businessman, journalist, or an accountant, just to name a few examples, and at the same time be an uneducated person. The difference between true education and vocational training has been cleverly blurred in our time so that we have people successfully practicing their vocations, while at the same time being totally ignorant of the larger issues of the world in which they live. (Many professional people have been conned by investment scams.)

The most obvious symptom is their absence of original thought. Ask them a question and they will end up reciting what someone else thinks or thought the answer was. What do they think? Well, they never thought about it. Their education consisted of learning how to use the library and cite sources. That greatly simplifies things for the controller because with lots of money, university endowments, foundations, grants, and ownership of media, it is relatively easy to control who they will think of as authorities to cite in lieu of doing their own thinking.

Another technique is to keep them entertained. Roman emperors did not stage circuses and gladiator contests because they didn't have television. The purpose is to keep the people's minds focused on entertainment, sports, and peripheral political issues. This way you won't have to worry that they will ever figure out the real issues that allow you to control them.

And the final straw is to control a person's health. Keep them drugged! Feed them propaganda as to what pills they can take to cover up symptoms of disease, force them to take vaccinations against all kinds of imaginable and unimaginable diseases. Elevate the status of doctors and acceptable health practitioners and their protocols to that of gods (with a little 'g') and restrict natural herbs and substances until these can be reclassified as more expensive "prescription drugs".

Remove the people's right to chose their own therapy and you have the perfect sheep to follow directives without the slightest question. In many ways, people will have become "sheeple" -- incapable of original thought to understand the most basic functions of their body or to analyze their condition for what it really is and to select a course of action that will restore the body, mind and emotions to normalcy (homeostasis).

Just as a truly educated person is difficult to control, so too is an economically independent person. Therefore, you want to create conditions that will produce people who work for wages, since wage earners have little control over their economic destiny. You'll also want to control the monetary, credit, and banking systems. This will allow you to inflate the currency and make it next to impossible for wage earners to accumulate capital. You can also cause periodic deflation to collapse the family businesses, family farms, and entrepreneurs, including independent community banks.

To keep trade unions under control, you just promote a scheme that allows you to shift production jobs out of the country and bring back the products as imports (it is called free trade). This way you will end up with no unions or docile unions. Another technique is to buy both political parties so that after a while people will feel that no matter whether they vote for Candidate A or Candidate B, they will get the same policies. This will create great apathy and a belief that the political process is useless for effecting real change.

Pretty soon you will have a population that feels completely helpless, and thinks the bad things happening to them are nobody in particular's fault, just a result of global forces or evolution or some other disembodied abstract concept. If necessary, you can offer scapegoats. Then you can bleed them dry with taxes without having to worry that they will find out who to blame. -- Charlie Reese

[Peikko 1,575]

Except, the guy is probably serious. The irony is, only an uneducated person would fall for a sloppy premise backed up by half truths.

[PhiLandShiR 18]

Except, the guy is probably serious. The irony is, only an uneducated person would fall for a sloppy premise backed up by half truths.

What better way to slip something by?

Bury it in sloppy premise and confuse it by half truths....

For that matter, from what I read in the papers about our education system, its been dumbed down so far that its a safe thing to say the most Americans are uneducated....

Edited February 23, 2010 by PhiLandShiR

[Darnell 8,479]

Something out of IBM's playbook ? yum !

[Peikko 1,575]

You do know what the sloppy premise is in this article, correct?

[PhiLandShiR 18]

You do know what the sloppy premise is in this article, correct?

That depends completely on what the reader believes...

[Peikko 1,575]

No, it doesn't. The premise does not depend on the reader, that's ridiculous. The writer has a premise that he endevours to support during the progress of the article, that's how this works. If there was no premise, the article would consist of a bunch of disjointed sentences.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Cleo has a point. My mouse is green. Who stole my stress ball?

[Peikko 1,575]

Your premise is we need to know what's on the desk in your cubicle.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Your premise is we need to know what's on the desk in your cubicle.

Fu&$1089; the mall.

[Peikko 1,575]

Now I'm lost

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

It wiggles in the wind. The window blinks. There goes another twitch.

[Peikko 1,575]

You might want to re think writing a travel blog

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

You might want to re think writing a travel blog

[M.O 6]

hmm different..