Jump to content
Rohini

NVC sent case to wrong consulate, now what?

 Share

7 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: India
Timeline

My fiance recently received Packet 3, however in an email New Delhi informed him that his case will be transfered to Mumbai. (Thank God! Who wants to have to interview in New Delhi if they don't have to?!!)

He is confused whether he should return the forms to New Delhi or what. Does anyone know or have experience with this? He has contacted New Delhi by email but has not yet gotten a reply. No luck contacted them by phone yet...

Our Timeline

Met online: 2005-08

Met in person the first time: 2007-11-11 <3

2008

December I-129F Sent: 2008-12-18 | I-129F NOA1: 2008-12-24

2009

April Our baby is born: 2009-04 <3<3<3

May CRBA* Interview: 2009-05 *Consular Report of Birth Abroad

July I-129F NOA2 : 2009-07-08 | NVC Received:2009-07-17 | Baby & Mommy returned to the U.S. 2009-07-20

August Consulate Received : 2009-08-06

September Packet 3 Received : 2009-09-09

Notified Case will be transfered: 2009-9-10

October Case transfered from New Delhi to Mumbai 2009-10-23 | Packet 3 received FROM MUMBAI: 2009-10-31

November Packet 3 Returned to Mumbai: 2009-11-03 | Packet 4/Interview Letter Received by EMAIL: 2009-11-23 | Documents Submitted: 2009-11-30

December Interview: 2009-12-09 (Result: 221g - Get joint sponsor)

2010

January -Joint Sponsor Documents Submitted- | Visa Issued :)2010-01

February Arrived in U.S. 2010-02 :) <3 | Married: 2010-02 <3

April Filed AOS(Rec. by USCIS): 2010-04-23

June Biometrics Appointment: 2010-06-02 | RFE: 2010-06-02 Request for copy of foreign BC;

Evidence Rec. by USCIS- 2010-06-07 | Denied*- 2010-06-08 :(*Due ultimately to USCIS error/claims foreign BC is translation

Currently: Refiling :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Syria
Timeline
My fiance recently received Packet 3, however in an email New Delhi informed him that his case will be transfered to Mumbai. (Thank God! Who wants to have to interview in New Delhi if they don't have to?!!)

He is confused whether he should return the forms to New Delhi or what. Does anyone know or have experience with this? He has contacted New Delhi by email but has not yet gotten a reply. No luck contacted them by phone yet...

I don't understand...if the case was transferred to Mumbai, how is that the wrong consulate?

If they emailed him about the move already, why is there hesitation on sending the papers to Delhi? My guess would be to send them to Mumbai? Has your fiance contacted the Mumbai consulate to confirm his case being there?

Timeline:

Sent in I-130 form: 01/29/09

Interview Date: 11/08/09 (APPROVED!)

Visa in Hand: 11/12/09

POE: 01/30/10 (!!!!) at JFK Airport in NYC... can't wait!

Got the green card maybe 8 weeks after 01/30/10...

TBC....

======================================================================

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: India
Timeline
My fiance recently received Packet 3, however in an email New Delhi informed him that his case will be transfered to Mumbai. (Thank God! Who wants to have to interview in New Delhi if they don't have to?!!)

He is confused whether he should return the forms to New Delhi or what. Does anyone know or have experience with this? He has contacted New Delhi by email but has not yet gotten a reply. No luck contacted them by phone yet...

You are right no one in their right mind would want to be interviewd in Delhi, they are so 'sour faced' and I wish they would make a change in staff if they haven't already. Some major negative vibes in that place for sure...must be the location.

Why don't you have him contact the Mumbai Embassy, since the case was sent there, they should now answer your questions.

Delhi is slow in their responses regardless whether or not your case is assigned there, so if your case isn't there anymore, I doubt they'll answer. Even if they do, they will just tell you to make any further inquiries to Mumbai.

Edited by k.loveh

K-1 Visa

Consulate : New Delhi, India

I-129F Sent : 2008-03-05

I-129F NOA1 : 2008-03-20

I-129F NOA2 : 2008-05-22

NVC Received : 2008-05-29

NVC Left : 2008-06-05

Consulate Received : 2008-06

Packet 3 Received : 2008-06

Packet 3 Sent : 2008-07

Packet 4 Received : 2008-07-16

Interview Date : 2008-08-25

August 25, 2008- Placed on A.P.

December 17, 2008- Petition Returned to USCIS for further review.

February 4, 2009- Received notice the USCIS has received returned petition.

June 4, 2009- Petition Reaffirmed by USCIS.

July 10, 2009- NVC sent Reaffirmed petition back to U.S.Embassy, New Delhi.

August 10, 2009- Embassy notified via email that they've received the Re-affirmed petition assigned with a 'new' case number as well as mailed Packet 3.

August 20, 2009- Embassy sent as an email attachment, the DS-230, Applicants Statement and Cover letter to Packet 3.

August 20, 2009- Mailed and Emailed request letter to Embassy to extend validity date of petition.

August 25, 2009 - Embassy received request to extend validity letter.

Sept 2, 2009- Embassy confirmed their receipt of the completed DS-230 and Applicants Statement.

October 29, 2009- 2nd Interview date- Visa Approved!

November 4th, 2009- Received Passport with Visa intact!

December 4th, 2009- Fiance arrived in U.S. - MARRIED Dec. 7th!

February 23rd-Mailed AOS Packet

March 3rd, 2010-Check Cashed

March 6th, 2010-Received AOS Receipt Notice

March 29th, 2010-Biometrics

Sept. 14, 2010-GC Interview -Approved!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: India
Timeline

Thanks for your replies. :)

Well the problem is that he hasn't been assigned a Mumbai case number. The same day he got Packet 3, an email from New Delhi (Related to where the heck is packet 3? -weeks late! A whole other story! :) ) stated that they noticed he lived in a state under Mumbai, and they would need to transfer it, nothing more. So he's wondering if he should hang on to it or send it to New Delhi and let them transfer it.

I was really puzzled when I got the letter from the NVC that it would be in New Delhi, as we had done our CRBA (Consular Report of Birth Abroad) in Mumbai and his interview for a tourist visa long back.

Our Timeline

Met online: 2005-08

Met in person the first time: 2007-11-11 <3

2008

December I-129F Sent: 2008-12-18 | I-129F NOA1: 2008-12-24

2009

April Our baby is born: 2009-04 <3<3<3

May CRBA* Interview: 2009-05 *Consular Report of Birth Abroad

July I-129F NOA2 : 2009-07-08 | NVC Received:2009-07-17 | Baby & Mommy returned to the U.S. 2009-07-20

August Consulate Received : 2009-08-06

September Packet 3 Received : 2009-09-09

Notified Case will be transfered: 2009-9-10

October Case transfered from New Delhi to Mumbai 2009-10-23 | Packet 3 received FROM MUMBAI: 2009-10-31

November Packet 3 Returned to Mumbai: 2009-11-03 | Packet 4/Interview Letter Received by EMAIL: 2009-11-23 | Documents Submitted: 2009-11-30

December Interview: 2009-12-09 (Result: 221g - Get joint sponsor)

2010

January -Joint Sponsor Documents Submitted- | Visa Issued :)2010-01

February Arrived in U.S. 2010-02 :) <3 | Married: 2010-02 <3

April Filed AOS(Rec. by USCIS): 2010-04-23

June Biometrics Appointment: 2010-06-02 | RFE: 2010-06-02 Request for copy of foreign BC;

Evidence Rec. by USCIS- 2010-06-07 | Denied*- 2010-06-08 :(*Due ultimately to USCIS error/claims foreign BC is translation

Currently: Refiling :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: India
Timeline
Thanks for your replies. :)

Well the problem is that he hasn't been assigned a Mumbai case number. The same day he got Packet 3, an email from New Delhi (Related to where the heck is packet 3? -weeks late! A whole other story! :) ) stated that they noticed he lived in a state under Mumbai, and they would need to transfer it, nothing more. So he's wondering if he should hang on to it or send it to New Delhi and let them transfer it.

I was really puzzled when I got the letter from the NVC that it would be in New Delhi, as we had done our CRBA (Consular Report of Birth Abroad) in Mumbai and his interview for a tourist visa long back.

Have you contacted the NVC about their error at all? Call them if you haven't already. or at least email them to see what they say about it, if anything at all. You would think they would reply since this seems to be their mistake in the first place.

The NVC are the ones who assign us the case numbers, not the Embassies. I don't think you're going to get assigned a new one just because it got sent to the wrong Embassy, unless they have special number sequences for each individual Embassy. Let me know if they do because now I'm curious.

If I were you, I would still attempt to contact the Mumbai branch (embassy) with your NVC case number, explaining this mix-up and to ask them if they've received your case info yet from Delhi.

All in all, this has only created a slight delay, so don't be worried, it will be alright.

Edited by k.loveh

K-1 Visa

Consulate : New Delhi, India

I-129F Sent : 2008-03-05

I-129F NOA1 : 2008-03-20

I-129F NOA2 : 2008-05-22

NVC Received : 2008-05-29

NVC Left : 2008-06-05

Consulate Received : 2008-06

Packet 3 Received : 2008-06

Packet 3 Sent : 2008-07

Packet 4 Received : 2008-07-16

Interview Date : 2008-08-25

August 25, 2008- Placed on A.P.

December 17, 2008- Petition Returned to USCIS for further review.

February 4, 2009- Received notice the USCIS has received returned petition.

June 4, 2009- Petition Reaffirmed by USCIS.

July 10, 2009- NVC sent Reaffirmed petition back to U.S.Embassy, New Delhi.

August 10, 2009- Embassy notified via email that they've received the Re-affirmed petition assigned with a 'new' case number as well as mailed Packet 3.

August 20, 2009- Embassy sent as an email attachment, the DS-230, Applicants Statement and Cover letter to Packet 3.

August 20, 2009- Mailed and Emailed request letter to Embassy to extend validity date of petition.

August 25, 2009 - Embassy received request to extend validity letter.

Sept 2, 2009- Embassy confirmed their receipt of the completed DS-230 and Applicants Statement.

October 29, 2009- 2nd Interview date- Visa Approved!

November 4th, 2009- Received Passport with Visa intact!

December 4th, 2009- Fiance arrived in U.S. - MARRIED Dec. 7th!

February 23rd-Mailed AOS Packet

March 3rd, 2010-Check Cashed

March 6th, 2010-Received AOS Receipt Notice

March 29th, 2010-Biometrics

Sept. 14, 2010-GC Interview -Approved!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: India
Timeline
Thanks for your replies. :)

Well the problem is that he hasn't been assigned a Mumbai case number. The same day he got Packet 3, an email from New Delhi (Related to where the heck is packet 3? -weeks late! A whole other story! :) ) stated that they noticed he lived in a state under Mumbai, and they would need to transfer it, nothing more. So he's wondering if he should hang on to it or send it to New Delhi and let them transfer it.

I was really puzzled when I got the letter from the NVC that it would be in New Delhi, as we had done our CRBA (Consular Report of Birth Abroad) in Mumbai and his interview for a tourist visa long back.

And one more thing. If I were in your place, I would 'not send anything more to Delhi'. It would just cause more delay. Wait till you get this cleared up, then proceed from there.

K-1 Visa

Consulate : New Delhi, India

I-129F Sent : 2008-03-05

I-129F NOA1 : 2008-03-20

I-129F NOA2 : 2008-05-22

NVC Received : 2008-05-29

NVC Left : 2008-06-05

Consulate Received : 2008-06

Packet 3 Received : 2008-06

Packet 3 Sent : 2008-07

Packet 4 Received : 2008-07-16

Interview Date : 2008-08-25

August 25, 2008- Placed on A.P.

December 17, 2008- Petition Returned to USCIS for further review.

February 4, 2009- Received notice the USCIS has received returned petition.

June 4, 2009- Petition Reaffirmed by USCIS.

July 10, 2009- NVC sent Reaffirmed petition back to U.S.Embassy, New Delhi.

August 10, 2009- Embassy notified via email that they've received the Re-affirmed petition assigned with a 'new' case number as well as mailed Packet 3.

August 20, 2009- Embassy sent as an email attachment, the DS-230, Applicants Statement and Cover letter to Packet 3.

August 20, 2009- Mailed and Emailed request letter to Embassy to extend validity date of petition.

August 25, 2009 - Embassy received request to extend validity letter.

Sept 2, 2009- Embassy confirmed their receipt of the completed DS-230 and Applicants Statement.

October 29, 2009- 2nd Interview date- Visa Approved!

November 4th, 2009- Received Passport with Visa intact!

December 4th, 2009- Fiance arrived in U.S. - MARRIED Dec. 7th!

February 23rd-Mailed AOS Packet

March 3rd, 2010-Check Cashed

March 6th, 2010-Received AOS Receipt Notice

March 29th, 2010-Biometrics

Sept. 14, 2010-GC Interview -Approved!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: India
Timeline

Thanks for your suggestions!

As of now Mumbai and NVC have told me to contact New Delhi. Both my finace and I have and no reply yet...

Our Timeline

Met online: 2005-08

Met in person the first time: 2007-11-11 <3

2008

December I-129F Sent: 2008-12-18 | I-129F NOA1: 2008-12-24

2009

April Our baby is born: 2009-04 <3<3<3

May CRBA* Interview: 2009-05 *Consular Report of Birth Abroad

July I-129F NOA2 : 2009-07-08 | NVC Received:2009-07-17 | Baby & Mommy returned to the U.S. 2009-07-20

August Consulate Received : 2009-08-06

September Packet 3 Received : 2009-09-09

Notified Case will be transfered: 2009-9-10

October Case transfered from New Delhi to Mumbai 2009-10-23 | Packet 3 received FROM MUMBAI: 2009-10-31

November Packet 3 Returned to Mumbai: 2009-11-03 | Packet 4/Interview Letter Received by EMAIL: 2009-11-23 | Documents Submitted: 2009-11-30

December Interview: 2009-12-09 (Result: 221g - Get joint sponsor)

2010

January -Joint Sponsor Documents Submitted- | Visa Issued :)2010-01

February Arrived in U.S. 2010-02 :) <3 | Married: 2010-02 <3

April Filed AOS(Rec. by USCIS): 2010-04-23

June Biometrics Appointment: 2010-06-02 | RFE: 2010-06-02 Request for copy of foreign BC;

Evidence Rec. by USCIS- 2010-06-07 | Denied*- 2010-06-08 :(*Due ultimately to USCIS error/claims foreign BC is translation

Currently: Refiling :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...