Another idiot with a gun

[john & jean 37]

CAN'T BE, NO BONG

[spookyturtle 9,466]

CAN'T BE, NO BONG

[SuperDuper! 230]

yes, you did agree with natty's post. or do you just run off and post without thinking about the ramifications?

now tell me what's so special about a high capacity magazine? a bit of practice and one can swap out magazines in a very short time. that is, after all, what they were designed for.

ammo piercing ammo is already banned for private use. surely you knew that, didn't you? no?

as for sharing information between state and federal government, you might check out the brady bill and what it requires. it's already in effect, although as from the story in the op, not effectively.

and before anyone else decides to fire rounds my way, i'm all for someone losing their firearms on the first incident of domestic violence........

First sane thing you've said all day

As who my employer is, I'm privy to quite a bit of info that I can't share. However, I can tell you charles that there are companies out there that still produce those rounds. They simply modify one aspect of them and sell them under the radar. Yes, I do agree that someone trained could reload smaller magazines quickly enough that they could pump out almost as many rounds as a high capacity. However, I'm not worried so much about those with that sort of training. Someone with law enforcement, or military training could do a lot more damage with a lot less than your average citizen. Those people are also a lot smaller in number.

How can you honestly defend having high capacity magazines or assault rifles?

now we're off on assault rifles.......

and somewhere on vj i've posted before two pics and asked for people to identify the "assault rifle" funny thing was, only those familiar with guns knew the answer.

it was the same gun, just cosmetic modifications were made.

It was the "Hello Kitty" version that couldn't possibly hurt a flea, right?

[rebeccajo 14]

Why then do you make the immediate leap to the assumption that if Crazy Joe has his gun taken away from him, someone is going to take it away from you?

Let me give you one example of how this type of thing ALREADY operates in civilized society. If Gangster Joe gets put in prison, he loses his rights - including his second amendment right. Has that affected your rights to the second amendment?

that first sentence - i wonder how many people said that in england?

and in some states, those get revoked rights get reinstated.

next?

You. Didn't. Answer. The. Questions.

[Ban Hammer 14,236]

yes, you did agree with natty's post. or do you just run off and post without thinking about the ramifications?

now tell me what's so special about a high capacity magazine? a bit of practice and one can swap out magazines in a very short time. that is, after all, what they were designed for.

ammo piercing ammo is already banned for private use. surely you knew that, didn't you? no?

as for sharing information between state and federal government, you might check out the brady bill and what it requires. it's already in effect, although as from the story in the op, not effectively.

and before anyone else decides to fire rounds my way, i'm all for someone losing their firearms on the first incident of domestic violence........

First sane thing you've said all day

As who my employer is, I'm privy to quite a bit of info that I can't share. However, I can tell you charles that there are companies out there that still produce those rounds. They simply modify one aspect of them and sell them under the radar. Yes, I do agree that someone trained could reload smaller magazines quickly enough that they could pump out almost as many rounds as a high capacity. However, I'm not worried so much about those with that sort of training. Someone with law enforcement, or military training could do a lot more damage with a lot less than your average citizen. Those people are also a lot smaller in number.

How can you honestly defend having high capacity magazines or assault rifles?

now we're off on assault rifles.......

and somewhere on vj i've posted before two pics and asked for people to identify the "assault rifle" funny thing was, only those familiar with guns knew the answer.

it was the same gun, just cosmetic modifications were made.

It was the "Hello Kitty" version that couldn't possibly hurt a flea, right?

actually it was a mini-14

[Heracles 417]

don't recognize that? i'm not surprised.......

enemies of the us can be domestic too ya know.

As a result, access to certain substances are further restricted. Heck, the other day I had to show ID to purchase baking soda. Or is that just a new Target supercentre thing.

[Ban Hammer 14,236]

Why then do you make the immediate leap to the assumption that if Crazy Joe has his gun taken away from him, someone is going to take it away from you?

Let me give you one example of how this type of thing ALREADY operates in civilized society. If Gangster Joe gets put in prison, he loses his rights - including his second amendment right. Has that affected your rights to the second amendment?

that first sentence - i wonder how many people said that in england?

and in some states, those get revoked rights get reinstated.

next?

You. Didn't. Answer. The. Questions.

so sue me.

[Ban Hammer 14,236]

don't recognize that? i'm not surprised.......

enemies of the us can be domestic too ya know.

As a result, access to certain substances are further restricted. Heck, the other day I had to show ID to purchase baking soda. Or is that just a new Target supercentre thing.

maybe it's just you?

[spookyturtle 9,466]

yes, you did agree with natty's post. or do you just run off and post without thinking about the ramifications?

now tell me what's so special about a high capacity magazine? a bit of practice and one can swap out magazines in a very short time. that is, after all, what they were designed for.

ammo piercing ammo is already banned for private use. surely you knew that, didn't you? no?

as for sharing information between state and federal government, you might check out the brady bill and what it requires. it's already in effect, although as from the story in the op, not effectively.

and before anyone else decides to fire rounds my way, i'm all for someone losing their firearms on the first incident of domestic violence........

First sane thing you've said all day

As who my employer is, I'm privy to quite a bit of info that I can't share. However, I can tell you charles that there are companies out there that still produce those rounds. They simply modify one aspect of them and sell them under the radar. Yes, I do agree that someone trained could reload smaller magazines quickly enough that they could pump out almost as many rounds as a high capacity. However, I'm not worried so much about those with that sort of training. Someone with law enforcement, or military training could do a lot more damage with a lot less than your average citizen. Those people are also a lot smaller in number.

How can you honestly defend having high capacity magazines or assault rifles?

now we're off on assault rifles.......

and somewhere on vj i've posted before two pics and asked for people to identify the "assault rifle" funny thing was, only those familiar with guns knew the answer.

it was the same gun, just cosmetic modifications were made.

It was the "Hello Kitty" version that couldn't possibly hurt a flea, right?

I'd hit it. With a large caliber cartridge.

[john & jean 37]

yes, you did agree with natty's post. or do you just run off and post without thinking about the ramifications?

now tell me what's so special about a high capacity magazine? a bit of practice and one can swap out magazines in a very short time. that is, after all, what they were designed for.

ammo piercing ammo is already banned for private use. surely you knew that, didn't you? no?

as for sharing information between state and federal government, you might check out the brady bill and what it requires. it's already in effect, although as from the story in the op, not effectively.

and before anyone else decides to fire rounds my way, i'm all for someone losing their firearms on the first incident of domestic violence........

First sane thing you've said all day

As who my employer is, I'm privy to quite a bit of info that I can't share. However, I can tell you charles that there are companies out there that still produce those rounds. They simply modify one aspect of them and sell them under the radar. Yes, I do agree that someone trained could reload smaller magazines quickly enough that they could pump out almost as many rounds as a high capacity. However, I'm not worried so much about those with that sort of training. Someone with law enforcement, or military training could do a lot more damage with a lot less than your average citizen. Those people are also a lot smaller in number.

How can you honestly defend having high capacity magazines or assault rifles?

now we're off on assault rifles.......

and somewhere on vj i've posted before two pics and asked for people to identify the "assault rifle" funny thing was, only those familiar with guns knew the answer.

it was the same gun, just cosmetic modifications were made.

It was the "Hello Kitty" version that couldn't possibly hurt a flea, right?

I'd hit it. With a large caliber cartridge.

full auto,eh

[spookyturtle 9,466]

full auto,eh

Rapid fire. I'd be empty in a second or two.

[john & jean 37]

full auto,eh

Rapid fire. I'd be empty in a second or two.

gives new meaning to sprayin and prayin

[rebeccajo 14]

Why then do you make the immediate leap to the assumption that if Crazy Joe has his gun taken away from him, someone is going to take it away from you?

Let me give you one example of how this type of thing ALREADY operates in civilized society. If Gangster Joe gets put in prison, he loses his rights - including his second amendment right. Has that affected your rights to the second amendment?

that first sentence - i wonder how many people said that in england?

and in some states, those get revoked rights get reinstated.

next?

You. Didn't. Answer. The. Questions.

so sue me.

Well that's just being bullheaded.

Edited September 9, 2009 by rebeccajo

[SuperDuper! 230]

yes, you did agree with natty's post. or do you just run off and post without thinking about the ramifications?

now tell me what's so special about a high capacity magazine? a bit of practice and one can swap out magazines in a very short time. that is, after all, what they were designed for.

ammo piercing ammo is already banned for private use. surely you knew that, didn't you? no?

as for sharing information between state and federal government, you might check out the brady bill and what it requires. it's already in effect, although as from the story in the op, not effectively.

and before anyone else decides to fire rounds my way, i'm all for someone losing their firearms on the first incident of domestic violence........

First sane thing you've said all day

As who my employer is, I'm privy to quite a bit of info that I can't share. However, I can tell you charles that there are companies out there that still produce those rounds. They simply modify one aspect of them and sell them under the radar. Yes, I do agree that someone trained could reload smaller magazines quickly enough that they could pump out almost as many rounds as a high capacity. However, I'm not worried so much about those with that sort of training. Someone with law enforcement, or military training could do a lot more damage with a lot less than your average citizen. Those people are also a lot smaller in number.

How can you honestly defend having high capacity magazines or assault rifles?

now we're off on assault rifles.......

and somewhere on vj i've posted before two pics and asked for people to identify the "assault rifle" funny thing was, only those familiar with guns knew the answer.

it was the same gun, just cosmetic modifications were made.

It was the "Hello Kitty" version that couldn't possibly hurt a flea, right?

actually it was a mini-14

You are right. My BB gun looks more scary than this boy scout pea shooter.

[Ban Hammer 14,236]

Why then do you make the immediate leap to the assumption that if Crazy Joe has his gun taken away from him, someone is going to take it away from you?

Let me give you one example of how this type of thing ALREADY operates in civilized society. If Gangster Joe gets put in prison, he loses his rights - including his second amendment right. Has that affected your rights to the second amendment?

that first sentence - i wonder how many people said that in england?

and in some states, those get revoked rights get reinstated.

next?

You. Didn't. Answer. The. Questions.

so sue me.

Well that's just being bullheaded.

kinda like some are when gun laws and ownership is explained to them?

personally, i tend to think we'll see more and more instances like this as the left wingers continue their campaign to paint gun owners as "nutcases" "weirdos" and so on. and as more and more fall for the rhetoric and dispose of their means of self defense, that's just more unarmed victims for the dregs of society to prey upon.