Geithner gives bank executives a warning

[peejay 327]

Geithner gives bank executives a warning

Associated Press

April 5, 2009, 12:07PM

WASHINGTON — The government may require new faces in executive suites at banks requiring “exceptional assistance” in the future, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Sunday.

Critics of the Obama administration’s move last weekend to force out the chairman of General Motors Corp., Rick Wagoner, as a condition for possible additional federal loans say that strong government intervention contrasts with measures placed on the financial industry in return for billions in infusions.

Geithner denied there was a double standard and put banks on notice that they may need to change leadership teams in exchange for accepting more money in the future.

“If, in the future, banks need exceptional assistance in order to get through this, then we’ll make sure that assistance comes with conditions, not just to protect the taxpayer but to make sure this is the kind of restructuring necessary for them to emerge stronger,” he told “Face the Nation” on CBS. “And where that requires a change of management of the board, we’ll do that.”

The treasury chief said that is what has happened at some big institutions that are getting large amounts of government aid. They include the mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were placed into conservatorship by the government last September, and insurer American International Group Inc., the recipient of more than $170 billion in help since last fall.

“We’ve already seen a substantial number of the largest banks in our country fail or be absorbed by other institutions, no longer existing at independent institutions. And where the government has acted, like in Fannie and Freddie or like in AIG, where we’ve had to do exceptional things to stabilize them, we have replaced the management and the board,” Geithner said.

“And we’ve done that because we want to make sure that taxpayers’ assistance is going to make these companies stronger, make sure there’s accountability, make sure it comes with strong conditions. And we’ll do that in the future if that is necessary,” he added.

“It’s a single standard, a single principle. And our obligation to the American people is to do what’s necessary to try to bring recovery back on track as quickly as possible.”

Asked if chief executives of big banks such as Citibank and Bank of America should worry about their jobs if their companies don’t improve their performance, Geithner said the government would not shy from such a restructuring.

“Where that’s necessary, where it meets the test, where it’s necessary to do what we ... exist to do, which is to make sure that this financial system supports recovery and the banks emerge stronger,” Geithner said.

As part of the new administration’s overhaul of the $700 billion bailout effort, banking regulators are requiring stress tests for the 19 largest banks to see whether they will need additional support to withstand a more severe downturn than the country is experiencing now.

Those tests are scheduled to be completed by the end of April. After that, the banks in need of additional capital will be given time to raise it on their own.

If they are not able to do so, they will be provided with extra support from the bailout fund. But the administration has said the additional support will come with tougher requirements to make sure the banks’ are using the money to increase lending to consumers and businesses.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/6359762.html

[Ban Hammer 14,271]

all your banks belong to us!

[peejay 327]

...tougher requirements to make sure the banks’ are using the money to increase lending to consumers and businesses.

Correct me if I'm mistaken, but wasn't the government pushing banks to dole out subprime loans what got us in this fix in the first place? And now Uncle Sugar wants to force more loans out of the banks that they feel should be doled out on their terms?

[ikarus 1]

A more realistic view of whats going on can be found here:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story..._takeover/print