Prior deportation for narcotics, illegal alien now sues rancher

[Ban Hammer 14,119]

Yeah, it's a conspiracy Charlie boy, a conspiracy I tell ya!

keep on laughing, we'll see who's laughing last. and it's charles, in case you need glasses.

You're as much of a Charlie boy as I am a 'dear' or a 'sugar'.

Oh, and I'll keep laughing, I think I'll laugh the longest

yeah dear or sugar was used in this thread somewhere i'm sure

i think you'll be bitterly disappointed at the end of it all though.

Oh, you've tried to 'dear' me on more than one occasion Mr Innocent. Keep working on the bitterness, that's your mirror, not mine

tried to or did? and how recently ago?

it's amazing that you really have nothing to add to this thread other than personal insults.

then again, maybe not that amazing.

Tried to or did. Priceless.

as usual, nothing of substance from you, just unsubstantiated statements.

[Peikko 1,575]

Yeah, it's a conspiracy Charlie boy, a conspiracy I tell ya!

keep on laughing, we'll see who's laughing last. and it's charles, in case you need glasses.

You're as much of a Charlie boy as I am a 'dear' or a 'sugar'.

Oh, and I'll keep laughing, I think I'll laugh the longest

yeah dear or sugar was used in this thread somewhere i'm sure

i think you'll be bitterly disappointed at the end of it all though.

Oh, you've tried to 'dear' me on more than one occasion Mr Innocent. Keep working on the bitterness, that's your mirror, not mine

tried to or did? and how recently ago?

it's amazing that you really have nothing to add to this thread other than personal insults.

then again, maybe not that amazing.

Tried to or did. Priceless.

as usual, nothing of substance from you, just unsubstantiated statements.

Tell me Charles, how exactly is an OT message board supposed to operate? Is there some kind of posting etiquette where only those who post 'something of substance' (in your view) are allowed to contribute? Seems to me if that is the case, your post count should be virtually nil.

[natty bumppo 297]

Yeah, it's a conspiracy Charlie boy, a conspiracy I tell ya!

keep on laughing, we'll see who's laughing last. and it's charles, in case you need glasses.

You're as much of a Charlie boy as I am a 'dear' or a 'sugar'.

Oh, and I'll keep laughing, I think I'll laugh the longest

yeah dear or sugar was used in this thread somewhere i'm sure

i think you'll be bitterly disappointed at the end of it all though.

Oh, you've tried to 'dear' me on more than one occasion Mr Innocent. Keep working on the bitterness, that's your mirror, not mine

tried to or did? and how recently ago?

it's amazing that you really have nothing to add to this thread other than personal insults.

then again, maybe not that amazing.

Tried to or did. Priceless.

as usual, nothing of substance from you, just unsubstantiated statements.

Tell me Charles, how exactly is an OT message board supposed to operate? Is there some kind of posting etiquette where only those who post 'something of substance' (in your view) are allowed to contribute? Seems to me if that is the case, your post count should be virtually nil.

prior statements about substance posts from some people make the above bold part ... priceless.

ever consider adding a substance posts disclaimer to your siggy?

[Peikko 1,575]

Yeah, it's a conspiracy Charlie boy, a conspiracy I tell ya!

keep on laughing, we'll see who's laughing last. and it's charles, in case you need glasses.

You're as much of a Charlie boy as I am a 'dear' or a 'sugar'.

Oh, and I'll keep laughing, I think I'll laugh the longest

yeah dear or sugar was used in this thread somewhere i'm sure

i think you'll be bitterly disappointed at the end of it all though.

Oh, you've tried to 'dear' me on more than one occasion Mr Innocent. Keep working on the bitterness, that's your mirror, not mine

tried to or did? and how recently ago?

it's amazing that you really have nothing to add to this thread other than personal insults.

then again, maybe not that amazing.

Tried to or did. Priceless.

as usual, nothing of substance from you, just unsubstantiated statements.

Tell me Charles, how exactly is an OT message board supposed to operate? Is there some kind of posting etiquette where only those who post 'something of substance' (in your view) are allowed to contribute? Seems to me if that is the case, your post count should be virtually nil.

prior statements about substance posts from some people make the above bold part ... priceless.

ever consider adding a substance posts disclaimer to your siggy?

Substance is as substance does and is very much in the eye of the beholder. Nice try though Natty Bamboo.

[natty bumppo 297]

keep on laughing, we'll see who's laughing last. and it's charles, in case you need glasses.

You're as much of a Charlie boy as I am a 'dear' or a 'sugar'.

Oh, and I'll keep laughing, I think I'll laugh the longest

yeah dear or sugar was used in this thread somewhere i'm sure

i think you'll be bitterly disappointed at the end of it all though.

Oh, you've tried to 'dear' me on more than one occasion Mr Innocent. Keep working on the bitterness, that's your mirror, not mine

tried to or did? and how recently ago?

it's amazing that you really have nothing to add to this thread other than personal insults.

then again, maybe not that amazing.

Tried to or did. Priceless.

as usual, nothing of substance from you, just unsubstantiated statements.

Tell me Charles, how exactly is an OT message board supposed to operate? Is there some kind of posting etiquette where only those who post 'something of substance' (in your view) are allowed to contribute? Seems to me if that is the case, your post count should be virtually nil.

prior statements about substance posts from some people make the above bold part ... priceless.

ever consider adding a substance posts disclaimer to your siggy?

Substance is as substance does and is very much in the eye of the beholder. Nice try though Natty Bamboo.

nice try yourself .... time to get your eyes checked again? seems you're having trouble today typing names that are spelled correctly on the same page

oh wait ... you're misspelling intentionally in an attempt to belittle people ...

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I don't know about "Natty" but "Nutty" seems about par for the course atm.

[Peikko 1,575]

Bamboo, the ultimate insult. Who knew?

[DeadPoolX 9]

If something was 'thrown out' then it was under consideration to be thrown out. This is not about making cash out of US citizens or preventing US citizens from behaving in a lawful fashion on their own property, it's about the treatment of illegal aliens by legal citizens when they trespass on their property. On reading the article, it seems that the judge is very much leaning in favour of the US citizen, that he behaved properly. However, to find that out, the case needs to be tested.

By the way, what happened to your 'left wing' court system? Seems you jumped the gun, mate

What sort of treatment should illegal aliens get when trespassing onto someone's property? In this case, it seems some people want illegal aliens to be treated with "kid gloves" and essentially given a free pass to roam wherever they wish.

Whether or not someone is legal or illegal, they must abide by the law. As an American citizen, I would have broken the law by trespassing and could be detained while waiting for the police to arrive. I was under the (possibly mistaken) impression that citizens have more rights than illegals, but even so, I couldn't claim a "violation of my civil rights." Suing them for my illegal act, regardless of the situation involved, would be ludicrous. I'd be on someone else's property without permission. Why is that so difficult to understand?

[natty bumppo 297]

Bamboo, the ultimate insult. Who knew?

didn't say I was insulted ... you projected again

[Ban Hammer 14,119]

Yeah, it's a conspiracy Charlie boy, a conspiracy I tell ya!

keep on laughing, we'll see who's laughing last. and it's charles, in case you need glasses.

You're as much of a Charlie boy as I am a 'dear' or a 'sugar'.

Oh, and I'll keep laughing, I think I'll laugh the longest

yeah dear or sugar was used in this thread somewhere i'm sure

i think you'll be bitterly disappointed at the end of it all though.

Oh, you've tried to 'dear' me on more than one occasion Mr Innocent. Keep working on the bitterness, that's your mirror, not mine

tried to or did? and how recently ago?

it's amazing that you really have nothing to add to this thread other than personal insults.

then again, maybe not that amazing.

Tried to or did. Priceless.

as usual, nothing of substance from you, just unsubstantiated statements.

Tell me Charles, how exactly is an OT message board supposed to operate? Is there some kind of posting etiquette where only those who post 'something of substance' (in your view) are allowed to contribute? Seems to me if that is the case, your post count should be virtually nil.

it is humorous to see standards vary depending on what you feel and that they are applied willy nilly as you see fit. i have to laugh at your inability to contribute anything meaningful to this topic other than your intentional veiled insults via misspellings of someone's vj name when whatever point you were trying to make had about as much meaning to the topic at hand as discussing the price of tea prior to a space launch.

when you have something worthwhile to say, wake me up.

[Peikko 1,575]

Yeah, it's a conspiracy Charlie boy, a conspiracy I tell ya!

keep on laughing, we'll see who's laughing last. and it's charles, in case you need glasses.

You're as much of a Charlie boy as I am a 'dear' or a 'sugar'.

Oh, and I'll keep laughing, I think I'll laugh the longest

yeah dear or sugar was used in this thread somewhere i'm sure

i think you'll be bitterly disappointed at the end of it all though.

Oh, you've tried to 'dear' me on more than one occasion Mr Innocent. Keep working on the bitterness, that's your mirror, not mine

tried to or did? and how recently ago?

it's amazing that you really have nothing to add to this thread other than personal insults.

then again, maybe not that amazing.

Tried to or did. Priceless.

as usual, nothing of substance from you, just unsubstantiated statements.

Tell me Charles, how exactly is an OT message board supposed to operate? Is there some kind of posting etiquette where only those who post 'something of substance' (in your view) are allowed to contribute? Seems to me if that is the case, your post count should be virtually nil.

it is humorous to see standards vary depending on what you feel and that they are applied willy nilly as you see fit. i have to laugh at your inability to contribute anything meaningful to this topic other than your intentional veiled insults via misspellings of someone's vj name when whatever point you were trying to make had about as much meaning to the topic at hand as discussing the price of tea prior to a space launch.

when you have something worthwhile to say, wake me up.

And yet, somehow you care, hence this long response. I know what it's about. For some reason, you want to succeed in a game of 'put the poster down'. However, for that to be successful, the poster has to care about their online image. I don't. Who knew?

[Ban Hammer 14,119]

keep on laughing, we'll see who's laughing last. and it's charles, in case you need glasses.

You're as much of a Charlie boy as I am a 'dear' or a 'sugar'.

Oh, and I'll keep laughing, I think I'll laugh the longest

yeah dear or sugar was used in this thread somewhere i'm sure

i think you'll be bitterly disappointed at the end of it all though.

Oh, you've tried to 'dear' me on more than one occasion Mr Innocent. Keep working on the bitterness, that's your mirror, not mine

tried to or did? and how recently ago?

it's amazing that you really have nothing to add to this thread other than personal insults.

then again, maybe not that amazing.

Tried to or did. Priceless.

as usual, nothing of substance from you, just unsubstantiated statements.

Tell me Charles, how exactly is an OT message board supposed to operate? Is there some kind of posting etiquette where only those who post 'something of substance' (in your view) are allowed to contribute? Seems to me if that is the case, your post count should be virtually nil.

it is humorous to see standards vary depending on what you feel and that they are applied willy nilly as you see fit. i have to laugh at your inability to contribute anything meaningful to this topic other than your intentional veiled insults via misspellings of someone's vj name when whatever point you were trying to make had about as much meaning to the topic at hand as discussing the price of tea prior to a space launch.

when you have something worthwhile to say, wake me up.

And yet, somehow you care, hence this long response. I know what it's about. For some reason, you want to succeed in a game of 'put the poster down'. However, for that to be successful, the poster has to care about their online image. I don't. Who knew?

rather interesting post, yet you've been the one to intentionally misspell/mistype two poster's names in this thread. yup, only you. ergo, it seems that in your post above, you are talking about yourself.

[Peikko 1,575]

Charlie boy is not a mispelling of your name, you kumquat. It's a pejorative, like 'dear' or 'sugar'

The second was. I really did think his moniker was Natty Bamboo, so sue me.

Your conclusion doesn't follow.

[Ban Hammer 14,119]

Charlie boy is not a mispelling of your name, you kumquat. It's a pejorative, like 'dear' or 'sugar'

The second was. I really did think his moniker was Natty Bamboo, so sue me.

Your conclusion doesn't follow.

call it what you wish, you still persist in it. business as usual.

[natty bumppo 297]

Charlie boy is not a mispelling of your name, you kumquat. It's a pejorative, like 'dear' or 'sugar'

The second was. I really did think his moniker was Natty Bamboo, so sue me.

Your conclusion doesn't follow.

call it what you wish, you still persist in it. business as usual.

bumppo vs bamboo ... yup so close ...