Obama's Tax Plan and the Plumber

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Punish people who succeed. How fair is that? Stupid liberals.

Build a house from the top down. Give it a shot. Stoopid trickle downers.

When was the last time a homeless man created a job? (and I don't mean social workers)

trickle-up poverty sucks

Nobody is talking about a homeless man creating a job. Mass purchasing power is what creates jobs and what creates more purchasing power as a result which then creates more jobs and so on. Demand side economics. Happens to work.

Still haven't answered the question when a structure was ever successfully build from the top down?

[Sofiyya 1,687]

These are basic voting requirements.

Your suggestions have all along been about ACORN and registrations.

You are going off on another tangent yet again. Try to stick to the issue at hand and quit failing.

Unlike you, I can walk and chew gum at the same time. ACORN is only part of the equation. Utility bills are listed as ID in these requirements. You may want to actually read them.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Punish people who succeed. How fair is that? Stupid liberals.

Build a house from the top down. Give it a shot. Stoopid trickle downers.

When was the last time a homeless man created a job? (and I don't mean social workers)

trickle-up poverty sucks

Nobody is talking about a homeless man creating a job. Mass purchasing power is what creates jobs and what creates more purchasing power as a result which then creates more jobs and so on. Demand side economics. Happens to work.

Still haven't answered the question when a structure was ever successfully build from the top down?

Purchasing power decreases when incentive to create or keep jobs is impaired. Increased taxation impedes job creation and limits purchasing power.

[HAL 9000 96]

So incentivize job creation. As Obama has proposed.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

So incentivize job creation. As Obama has proposed.

He has proposed to have the right hand give and the left hand take away. Tax credits vs. increased taxation on profits.

[HAL 9000 96]

That's what you want to read into it.

Don't confuse your interpretation of Obama's job creation initiative with McCain's health insurance plan.

Edited October 16, 2008 by HAL 9000

[Sofiyya 1,687]

That's what you want to read into it.

Don't confuse your interpretation of Obama's job creation initiative with McCain's health insurance plan.

I heard what he said and his plan is contradictory. Not my fault.

[HAL 9000 96]

That's what you want to read into it.

Don't confuse your interpretation of Obama's job creation initiative with McCain's health insurance plan.

I heard what he said and his plan is contradictory. Not my fault.

Tends to happen when one hears what one wants to hear.

[IAMX 3,055]

These are basic voting requirements.

Your suggestions have all along been about ACORN and registrations.

You are going off on another tangent yet again. Try to stick to the issue at hand and quit failing.

Unlike you, I can walk and chew gum at the same time. ACORN is only part of the equation. Utility bills are listed as ID in these requirements. You may want to actually read them.

Point out registration requirements. These are VOTING requirements for everyone. Show me a state that hands an absentee ballot to a first time voter without ID and likely some secondary form of proof. Fail yet again.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

That's what you want to read into it.

Don't confuse your interpretation of Obama's job creation initiative with McCain's health insurance plan.

I heard what he said and his plan is contradictory. Not my fault.

Tends to happen when one hears what one wants to hear.

Also tends to happen when one has a transitional socialist economic plan.

[HAL 9000 96]

These are basic voting requirements.

Your suggestions have all along been about ACORN and registrations.

You are going off on another tangent yet again. Try to stick to the issue at hand and quit failing.

Unlike you, I can walk and chew gum at the same time. ACORN is only part of the equation. Utility bills are listed as ID in these requirements. You may want to actually read them.

Point out registration requirements. These are VOTING requirements for everyone. Show me a state that hands an absentee ballot to a first time voter without ID and likely some secondary form of proof. Fail yet again.

Excellent points.

That's what you want to read into it.

Don't confuse your interpretation of Obama's job creation initiative with McCain's health insurance plan.

I heard what he said and his plan is contradictory. Not my fault.

Tends to happen when one hears what one wants to hear.

Also tends to happen when one has a transitional socialist economic plan.

Is or isn't isn't up to you to judge by yourself. Come Election Day I suspect you will not be very happy.

[IAMX 3,055]

It's funny the turn this has taken. First VW was suggesting ACORN, with proximity to Obama, is committing voter fraud with registering new voters, yet now is trying to hold their own, after the stupid Clint Curtis nonsense, and now this, to even show HOW one even commits voter fraud via new registrations.

Oh the trouble you get into making asinine blanket statements..

Edited October 16, 2008 by SRVT

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Point out registration requirements. These are VOTING requirements for everyone. Show me a state that hands an absentee ballot to a first time voter without ID and likely some secondary form of proof. Fail yet again.

You refuse to indulge the reality of the laws and how they are subverted, which is why there are continuing court cases about how to vote and what ID is required. All you hae done is talk, but have provided nothing to back up your points other than wishful thinking. That is your failure.

Is or isn't isn't up to you to judge by yourself. Come Election Day I suspect you will not be very happy.

The first election I voted in was in 1976. I've long gotten over an election making me happy or unhappy.

[IAMX 3,055]

Point out registration requirements. These are VOTING requirements for everyone. Show me a state that hands an absentee ballot to a first time voter without ID and likely some secondary form of proof. Fail yet again.

You refuse to indulge the reality of the laws and how they are subverted, which is why there are continuing court cases about how to vote and what ID is required. All you hae done is talk, but have provided nothing to back up your points other than wishful thinking. That is your failure.

Strange, because with your assertions, you could have at least shown how Mickey Mouse could vote.

Can anyone here suggest VW showed them how? VW apparently is in denial.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

It's funny the turn this has taken. First VW was suggesting ACORN, with proximity to Obama, is committing voter fraud with registering new voters, yet now is trying to hold their own, after the stupid Clint Curtis nonsense, and now this, to even show HOW one even commits voter fraud via new registrations.

Oh the trouble you get into making asinine blanket statements..

I'm sure you're quite familiar with that.

Try putting some proof to your own assertions. You haven't made even one attempt to do so. I have. You are all talk, no action.