Obama's Dimestore 'Mein Kampf'

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Marc, seriously. The TOS is for VJ members, not making comments about public figures. Stop your nonsense.

Listen, critisizing someone for making hateful remarks and then turning around with even more hate and then justifying it, is well sketchy at best.

Also the insulting comments to distract and deter are quite obvious. Very sad.

[kaydee457 13]

Like I said, the more vehement the liberals get the truer the message of those they attack!

Afraid that reasoning is rather wonky

haec olim meminisse iuvabit

[Mags 112]

Marc, seriously. The TOS is for VJ members, not making comments about public figures. Stop your nonsense.

Listen, critisizing someone for making hateful remarks and then turning around with even more hate and then justifying it, is well sketchy at best.

Also the insulting comments to distract and deter are quite obvious. Very sad.

Pot, have you met Mr Kettle?

Seriously, Marc, you are one of the worst offenders on VJ when it comes to insulting people. I'm just trying to show you the irony of your indignation.

[SteveLaura 0]

Like I said, the more vehement the liberals get the truer the message of those they attack!

Afraid that reasoning is rather wonky

haec olim meminisse iuvabit

ego have haud informatio quis vos duos es sermo super

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Marc, seriously. The TOS is for VJ members, not making comments about public figures. Stop your nonsense.

Listen, critisizing someone for making hateful remarks and then turning around with even more hate and then justifying it, is well sketchy at best.

Also the insulting comments to distract and deter are quite obvious. Very sad.

Pot, have you met Mr Kettle?

Seriously, Marc, you are one of the worst offenders on VJ when it comes to insulting people. I'm just trying to show you the irony of your indignation.

I see, Im the bad guy? Show me a post of mine wishing someone to die! Wont find it. Mags, come on. Wishing someone dead and then rationalizing it away? based on them not being here. Fcuking amazing.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

TOS prohibits that kind of language directed at a VJ member.

If you'd like the TOS broadened to include non-members (like Ann Coulter), maybe you could start a thread in the Site Discussions forum and bring it up for discussion.

[Mags 112]

Marc, seriously. The TOS is for VJ members, not making comments about public figures. Stop your nonsense.

Listen, critisizing someone for making hateful remarks and then turning around with even more hate and then justifying it, is well sketchy at best.

Also the insulting comments to distract and deter are quite obvious. Very sad.

Pot, have you met Mr Kettle?

Seriously, Marc, you are one of the worst offenders on VJ when it comes to insulting people. I'm just trying to show you the irony of your indignation.

I see, Im the bad guy? Show me a post of mine wishing someone to die! Wont find it. Mags, come on. Wishing someone dead and then rationalizing it away? based on them not being here. Fcuking amazing.

Yes, I am. Thank you.

Edited April 10, 2008 by Mags

[metta 0]

Running away from a very hateful remark and turning it into a joke. Now thats truly telling. The back scratching here is very ugly I hope you all can see it.

Marc, a remark towards Ann Coulter who isn't, I assure you, a member here and a remark against, for example, Steven is very different. You yourself are responsible for many disparaging and hateful remarks towards MEMBERS here.

That's the difference in this case. But I guess it's easy to assume that the mods are scratching the back of certain members here, it makes good reading and let's face it, we're easy targets.

I fully expect many of these -------> emoticons to follow this remark. Go for it, one and all.

I honestly don't see or assume that mods are scratching the back of certain memebrs here.

But I do see one mod mothering an SO who IS a VJ memebr with impulse control problem and temper tantrums. It's time to let the man-child fight his own battles in life and stop rushing out to defend the said person everytime someone responds to his offensive comments.

Edited April 10, 2008 by metta

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Running away from a very hateful remark and turning it into a joke. Now thats truly telling. The back scratching here is very ugly I hope you all can see it.

Marc, a remark towards Ann Coulter who isn't, I assure you, a member here and a remark against, for example, Steven is very different. You yourself are responsible for many disparaging and hateful remarks towards MEMBERS here.

That's the difference in this case. But I guess it's easy to assume that the mods are scratching the back of certain members here, it makes good reading and let's face it, we're easy targets.

I fully expect many of these -------> emoticons to follow this remark. Go for it, one and all.

I honestly don't see or assume that mods are scratching the back of certain memebrs here.

But I do see one mod mothering an SO who IS a VJ memebr with impulse control problem and temper tantrums. It's time to let the man-child fight his own battles in life.

Children, now that is a textbook example of a TOS violation. Why? It's directed at an actual VJ member.

[Mags 112]

That's the difference in this case. But I guess it's easy to assume that the mods are scratching the back of certain members here, it makes good reading and let's face it, we're easy targets.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

I know this image offended one of the mods, but I love it.. it's so funny!

[Mags 112]

I know this image offended one of the mods, but I love it.. it's so funny!

I actually quite like it. It goes with my member title...

[metta 0]

Running away from a very hateful remark and turning it into a joke. Now thats truly telling. The back scratching here is very ugly I hope you all can see it.

Marc, a remark towards Ann Coulter who isn't, I assure you, a member here and a remark against, for example, Steven is very different. You yourself are responsible for many disparaging and hateful remarks towards MEMBERS here.

That's the difference in this case. But I guess it's easy to assume that the mods are scratching the back of certain members here, it makes good reading and let's face it, we're easy targets.

I fully expect many of these -------> emoticons to follow this remark. Go for it, one and all.

I honestly don't see or assume that mods are scratching the back of certain memebrs here.

But I do see one mod mothering an SO who IS a VJ memebr with impulse control problem and temper tantrums. It's time to let the man-child fight his own battles in life.

Children, now that is a textbook example of a TOS violation. Why? It's directed at an actual VJ member.

Which one?

[Mags 112]

Running away from a very hateful remark and turning it into a joke. Now thats truly telling. The back scratching here is very ugly I hope you all can see it.

Marc, a remark towards Ann Coulter who isn't, I assure you, a member here and a remark against, for example, Steven is very different. You yourself are responsible for many disparaging and hateful remarks towards MEMBERS here.

That's the difference in this case. But I guess it's easy to assume that the mods are scratching the back of certain members here, it makes good reading and let's face it, we're easy targets.

I fully expect many of these -------> emoticons to follow this remark. Go for it, one and all.

I honestly don't see or assume that mods are scratching the back of certain memebrs here.

But I do see one mod mothering an SO who IS a VJ memebr with impulse control problem and temper tantrums. It's time to let the man-child fight his own battles in life.

Children, now that is a textbook example of a TOS violation. Why? It's directed at an actual VJ member.

It is. Isn't that ironic.

Watch and learn, children.

Running away from a very hateful remark and turning it into a joke. Now thats truly telling. The back scratching here is very ugly I hope you all can see it.

Marc, a remark towards Ann Coulter who isn't, I assure you, a member here and a remark against, for example, Steven is very different. You yourself are responsible for many disparaging and hateful remarks towards MEMBERS here.

That's the difference in this case. But I guess it's easy to assume that the mods are scratching the back of certain members here, it makes good reading and let's face it, we're easy targets.

I fully expect many of these -------> emoticons to follow this remark. Go for it, one and all.

I honestly don't see or assume that mods are scratching the back of certain memebrs here.

But I do see one mod mothering an SO who IS a VJ memebr with impulse control problem and temper tantrums. It's time to let the man-child fight his own battles in life.

Children, now that is a textbook example of a TOS violation. Why? It's directed at an actual VJ member.

Which one?

Which one? Ah come now, don't play games. I'm the only mod here with a SO member.

[kaydee457 13]

Like I said, the more vehement the liberals get the truer the message of those they attack!

Afraid that reasoning is rather wonky

haec olim meminisse iuvabit

ego have haud informatio quis vos duos es sermo super

sorry- translation.....One day, we'll look back on this and smile