Hillary Clinton Again Raises Running With Obama

[rebeccajo 14]

In all fairness, dev is right. She did qualify her statement.

It would have been a little more gracious to have stated it was too early in the process to discuss that.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

She did so for calculating reasons, particularly in a state where Obama is heavily favored to win. It's like saying, "You can vote for either one of us, because we'll both be on the ticket."

[no name 1]

She did so for calculating reasons, particularly in a state where Obama is heavily favored to win. It's like saying, "You can vote for either one of us, because we'll both be on the ticket."

[Ban Hammer 12,901]

She did so for calculating reasons, particularly in a state where Obama is heavily favored to win. It's like saying, "You can vote for either one of us, because we'll both be on the ticket."

all that means is she's noticed lots of water in her ship,

[simple_male 1]

It's good that they're playing dirty, it's practice for the final. Whoever ends up playing.

Richardson would be a mistake, for either potential nominee.

I agree. His ties are too close to the Clinton Adminstration which would be a turn off to Republicans and Independents.

+ the whole Los Alamos thing + numerous intemperate remarks regarding foreign countries like Pakistan...

You have good points.

[no name 1]

She did so for calculating reasons, particularly in a state where Obama is heavily favored to win. It's like saying, "You can vote for either one of us, because we'll both be on the ticket."

all that means is she's noticed lots of water in her ship,

Tuesday's results say differently.

[Ban Hammer 12,901]

She did so for calculating reasons, particularly in a state where Obama is heavily favored to win. It's like saying, "You can vote for either one of us, because we'll both be on the ticket."

all that means is she's noticed lots of water in her ship,

Tuesday's results say differently.

keep bailing dev

[no name 1]

She did so for calculating reasons, particularly in a state where Obama is heavily favored to win. It's like saying, "You can vote for either one of us, because we'll both be on the ticket."

all that means is she's noticed lots of water in her ship,

Tuesday's results say differently.

keep bailing dev

She won 3 contests on Tuesday Charles. Are you that confused that you can't see her support exists? She raised over 4M since Tuesday, hardly the signs of a failing campaign.

Edited March 7, 2008 by illumine

[Ban Hammer 12,901]

She did so for calculating reasons, particularly in a state where Obama is heavily favored to win. It's like saying, "You can vote for either one of us, because we'll both be on the ticket."

all that means is she's noticed lots of water in her ship,

Tuesday's results say differently.

keep bailing dev

She won 3 contests on Tuesday Charles. Are you that confused that you can't see her support exists? She raised over 4M since Tuesday, hardly the signs of a failing campaign.

i see her support on vj. you and one other

[garya505 2]

It's good that they're playing dirty, it's practice for the final. Whoever ends up playing.

Richardson would be a mistake, for either potential nominee.

I agree. His ties are too close to the Clinton Adminstration which would be a turn off to Republicans and Independents.

+ the whole Los Alamos thing + numerous intemperate remarks regarding foreign countries like Pakistan...

What is "the whole Los Alamos thing" you are referring to?