Clinton sees ticket with Obama: Video

[no name 1]

He would never take her on as VP.

I think this was a hint that she would take him. Would he do it though? Doubt it. It would be unbeatable though.

She has attacked Obama on all things presidential. If she takes him as her running mate, she is going to have to defend him on the same attacks she has made. She would also have to support him, in the case that during presidency she has to suceed power to the VP.

If she wants to make it work, she has to change the direction and style of her campaign, otherwise its just a empty promise.

I agree....and she won't change the direction and style because yesterday's outcome shows it works to a degree. Just like a seasoned defense attorney, all she's got to do is instill enough doubt in the voters' minds that maybe Obama isn't who he says he is. Obama is going to have to go negative too, but it's got to come from operatives outside of his campaign.

Why can't he do it? It's part of web of deceit like Canada....

Of course it would be deceitful, but Hillary's strategy has shown that deceitfulness can instill enough doubt in voter's minds about her opponent. Politics as usual.

so when she does it - it's OK but for some unknown reason - he has to hide it?

Edited March 5, 2008 by illumine

[Cassie 8]

Why can't he do it? It's part of web of deceit like Canada....

what the heck does that mean?

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

I assume the deceitfulness of reassuring Canada about Nafta while disparaging it to Ohio voters

[no name 1]

I assume the deceitfulness of reassuring Canada about Nafta while disparaging it to Ohio voters

I left out the word 'his'...

[one...two...tree 2,762]

He would never take her on as VP.

I think this was a hint that she would take him. Would he do it though? Doubt it. It would be unbeatable though.

She has attacked Obama on all things presidential. If she takes him as her running mate, she is going to have to defend him on the same attacks she has made. She would also have to support him, in the case that during presidency she has to suceed power to the VP.

If she wants to make it work, she has to change the direction and style of her campaign, otherwise its just a empty promise.

I agree....and she won't change the direction and style because yesterday's outcome shows it works to a degree. Just like a seasoned defense attorney, all she's got to do is instill enough doubt in the voters' minds that maybe Obama isn't who he says he is. Obama is going to have to go negative too, but it's got to come from operatives outside of his campaign.

Why can't he do it? It's part of web of deceit like Canada....

Of course it would be deceitful, but Hillary's strategy has shown that deceitfulness can instill enough doubt in voter's minds about her opponent. Politics as usual.

so when she does it - it's OK but for some unknown reason - he has to hide it?

I hope he can win without doing so, but when it comes down to fighting fire with fire, he may just have to throw some back at her.

[Dan J 277]

I assume the deceitfulness of reassuring Canada about Nafta while disparaging it to Ohio voters

Except it turned out to be a play by the Canadian government (The leading party) to help McCain.

I guess it worked.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/5/112...0842/300/469572

[no name 1]

He would never take her on as VP.

I think this was a hint that she would take him. Would he do it though? Doubt it. It would be unbeatable though.

She has attacked Obama on all things presidential. If she takes him as her running mate, she is going to have to defend him on the same attacks she has made. She would also have to support him, in the case that during presidency she has to suceed power to the VP.

If she wants to make it work, she has to change the direction and style of her campaign, otherwise its just a empty promise.

I agree....and she won't change the direction and style because yesterday's outcome shows it works to a degree. Just like a seasoned defense attorney, all she's got to do is instill enough doubt in the voters' minds that maybe Obama isn't who he says he is. Obama is going to have to go negative too, but it's got to come from operatives outside of his campaign.

Why can't he do it? It's part of web of deceit like Canada....

Of course it would be deceitful, but Hillary's strategy has shown that deceitfulness can instill enough doubt in voter's minds about her opponent. Politics as usual.

so when she does it - it's OK but for some unknown reason - he has to hide it?

I hope he can win without doing so, but when it comes down to fighting fire with fire, he may just have to throw some back at her.

CHICAGO - Democratic Sen. Barack Obama on Wednesday blamed his primary defeats in Ohio and Texas on rival Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's criticism and news coverage that he argued benefited her at his expense.

The presidential candidate said he planned to do more in the days ahead to raise doubts about his opponent's claims to foreign policy and other Washington experience.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23486748/

[no name 1]

“The great irony is, she is now the ‘hope’ candidate,” said Dan Gerstein, a Democratic strategist who backs Mr. Obama. “She can only hope to catch some breaks and catch Obama stumbling.”

link

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

I assume the deceitfulness of reassuring Canada about Nafta while disparaging it to Ohio voters

Except it turned out to be a play by the Canadian government (The leading party) to help McCain.

I guess it worked.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/5/112...0842/300/469572

I can't open that link but I thought Stephen Harper has distanced himself from the "leak"?

[Dan J 277]

I assume the deceitfulness of reassuring Canada about Nafta while disparaging it to Ohio voters

Except it turned out to be a play by the Canadian government (The leading party) to help McCain.

I guess it worked.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/5/112...0842/300/469572

I can't open that link but I thought Stephen Harper has distanced himself from the "leak"?

Does this work: http://www.cbc.ca/mrl3/8752/vsu/wmv-hi/mac...-memo080303.wmv Its a video though.

Well Steven posted an article about the same thing: http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=114253

Edited March 6, 2008 by Dan + Gemvita

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

Yeah - I saw that. I'm not sure I see Obama as being completely exonerated on this one, although a both think they're peddling a lot of horse manure on this issue