| Names |
CIS Office  |
Filing Instance  |
Filed  |
NOA  |
RFE(s)  |
Approval  |
Received  |
Comments. List anything unique to your case.  |
Updated Last  |
Jay & Kay
|
Chicago National Office |
First |
2016-07-05 |
2016-07-13 |
|
2016-09-20 |
2016-10-07 |
|
2019-11-04 |
Canada123 & Canada123
|
Chicago National Office |
First |
2016-07-08 |
2016-07-12 |
|
2016-09-19 |
2016-10-07 |
|
2018-04-19 |
F & D
|
Chicago National Office |
First |
2016-07-11 |
2016-07-12 |
|
2016-09-21 |
2016-10-07 |
|
2019-12-16 |
Y & K
|
Chicago National Office |
First |
2016-05-31 |
2016-06-09 |
|
2016-09-13 |
2016-10-06 |
Ridiculous USCIS. Don't assume your case will go like everyone else's in the database. Babysit it and file online SR at day 75 and day 90.
Submitted "SR" at 93 and no response. Contacted Senator on day 97, next day response of "assigned to officer". Submitted second SR on 105 (agent didn't see 1st one) on basis of "past regulatory time frame" and approved later that day. Went "into production" on 113. Mailed on 126. Arrived 128.
Recommendation: On day 75, submit a SR Online for the EAD noting "approaching regulatory time frame". Followup on day 90 if necessary with another "past regulator time frame" Online SR.
I'll emphasize online SR such that telephone "customer service" doesn't have an opportunity to mess it up. |
2020-12-22 |
Nhung & Ron
|
Chicago National Office |
First |
2016-07-20 |
|
|
2016-09-20 |
2016-10-05 |
|
2017-03-07 |
Danielle & Andrew
|
Columbus OH |
First |
2016-07-16 |
2016-07-21 |
|
2016-09-20 |
2016-10-05 |
|
2019-09-01 |
Donal & Amanda
|
Detroit MI |
First |
2016-06-13 |
2016-06-21 |
|
2016-09-19 |
2016-10-05 |
|
2021-02-24 |
Greg & Lindsay
|
Chicago National Office |
First |
2016-07-14 |
2016-07-18 |
|
2016-09-19 |
2016-10-04 |
|
2020-03-10 |
lia & al
|
Chicago National Office |
First |
2016-07-06 |
2016-07-12 |
|
2016-09-20 |
2016-10-04 |
|
2021-11-23 |
Moore & Octavia
|
Chicago National Office |
First |
2016-07-11 |
2016-07-14 |
|
2016-09-21 |
2016-10-04 |
|
2016-10-22 |