-
Posts
2,458 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Partners
Immigration Wiki
Guides
Immigration Forms
Times
Gallery
Store
Blogs
Posts posted by akdiver
-
-
That's short sighted thinking, ignores the concept of "mindshare" and fails to recognize that acclimation is the key to subjugation.
You could dredge up dozens of right wing articles that are just as scary. Everyone pull their panties out of their buttcrack and knock it off. Until anything is remotely close to becoming a policy it doesn't matter, so enough already.The usual suspects have their heads in the sand. -
Screw that. Just open fire when you see this kind of thing.I'd make driving with a cell phone in your hand a 25 to life crime. Driving in the left lane with a cell phone in hand would be grounds for the death penalty. -
Yeah, I don't understand that either.just like you see in NFL and NHL games.ANYTHING can be a first, if you look hard enough.
Today I was the first white man driving a silver vehicle, while wearing a black down coat and sandles to go to a specific fred meyer at a specific address and buy exactly $110.32 worth of food - on this specific date.
Big deal.
-
Only if his name is Obama.Suppose if an Alien from outer space was born and raised on Earth and on USA soil. Will the Alien be able to run for President? -
Anchorage (NBC) ― AKDiver has stubbed his toe on 2x4 in his garage! Reports indicate that the piece of wood was painted black, while AKDiver is white. Police are indicating the possibility that this beating may be a hate crime. We will continue to follow this story as it develops.
-
Instead, the government wants to give you a fixed 3 percent annual return... 3 percent!
So help me god, if this plan comes to pass, I will make Mcveigh look like a ###### saint.
-
If you're serious, that might be the smartest thing I've seen you say on VJ.Is it time for a revolution?I'm ready. -
Yeah - not much one can say in response to that one, eh?You're more concerned with plastic water bottles than the war on terror?Truthfully?
YES!
-
...and how many democrats voted for it? Let's take a look, shall we?Okay, I will touch on only one of the many of my "wonders":The Patriot Act.
Here's how the senate voted:
Akaka (D-HI)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Bond (R-MO)
Boxer (D-CA)
Breaux (D-LA)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Byrd (D-WV)
Campbell (R-CO)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carnahan (D-MO)
Carper (D-DE)
Chafee (R-RI)
Cleland (D-GA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
Daschle (D-SD)
Dayton (D-MN)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dodd (D-CT)
Domenici (R-NM)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Edwards (D-NC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Fitzgerald (R-IL)
Frist (R-TN)
Graham (D-FL)
Gramm (R-TX)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Helms (R-NC)
Hollings (D-SC)
Hutchinson (R-AR)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Miller (D-GA)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Nickles (R-OK)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Santorum (R-PA)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-NH)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Stevens (R-AK)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thompson (R-TN)
Thurmond (R-SC)
Torricelli (D-NJ)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)
Wellstone (D-MN)
Wyden (D-OR)
Looky there - all but two democrats voted for it. As for the House - 145 democrats voted for the Patriot act.
So, please tell us again how the democrats will protect us from evils as the Patriot Act.
-
If you eliminate the deductions for contributions, then people simply will not contribute. What's the incentive? Might as well just take the money as take home pay and save it in some other kind of account.
Once people stop voluntarily contributing, then they will be forced to contribute. This is exactly how social security works.
Bottom line? Tax increase.
-
We applied in beginning of september. Interview is beginning of December.
-
Of course it is. I dunno why anyone would think differently.I will be applying for my US citizenship next month and would like to setup PO BOX for my N-400 communication with USCIS. I want to keep my home mail address for my other regular mail (Bills, pay check, insurance etc). I do not want to change my mail home address with USCIS for other applications. Is that possible?You can put any mailing address you want on any app you send them.
FWIW, I for "residence address" I always make a note: NO MAILBOX! DO NOT SEND MAIL HERE!!!
I have no mail box for my house. Any mail sent to my street address gets stamped "no mail receptacle at address" and is returned to sender.
-
In general, I prefer to maintain control over my own money and destiny.I'm sick of politics, lets have some fun. What do you prefer. Ladies please participate too. -
I bet Cam knows.but where's the bang for the buck? -
As Madison correctly pointed out, ''the Western States neither would nor ought to submit to a union which degraded them from an equal rank with the other States.'' Since the admission of Tennessee in 1796, Congress has included in each State's act of admission a clause providing that the State enters the Union ''on an equal footing with the original States in all respects whatever.''
The thing that the anti-EC people don't seem to get is the States, are in and of themselves a sovereign legal entity, regardless of their population. The U.S. is NOT just "one big nation" - it is nation composed of (currently) 50 states, and each of those states exists and has a voice, independent of the people who live there.
As SCOTUS ruled in 1911, 'This Union' was and is a union of States, equal in power, dignity and authority, each competent to exert that residuum of sovereignty not delegated to the United States by the Constitution itself.
-
Because of the "equal footing doctrine" - the notion that each state is an equal member of the political union, regardless of anything else. The same logic is already used with respect to congress. It's why each state gets 2 votes in the senate, regardless of their population.My main question regarding EC vs PC is this: Why should Wyoming vote count for so much considering that it, as a population, does not contribute as much to the whole US of A? -
The very last words I want to hear out of any politician's mouth are about his religion - whatever it may be.
-
...history would be wrong.
-
I can tell you this right now. If the government confiscates my private retirement accounts and gives them to the social security agency to "manage", I WILL become a "terrorist."
-
By the way - Mox gets it.
We're not just talking about the voice of "the people". We're talking about the voice of each individual State as a sovereign entity, equal to all of the other States.
-
That's true for any contract.For one you kind of have to assume that everyone who would sign up to this kind of arbitrary marriage contract is in their own right mind at the time and their inalienable rights (such as human rights are defined by the constitution and bill of rights) wouldn't be infringed by an unscrupulous partner or an incompetent lawyer.
..and so naturally, you assume that people would be signing over all their rights....If you were able to sign your rights away at the outset of marriage...
Is allowing people to decide for themselves how their marriage should work, and maximizing liberty.What you're suggesting....
So you should only protect against discrimination, if it is convenient to do so.You don't need to throw the rule book out of the window simply because one group of minorities is seeking a slight rule change to protect their interests.
I pay for "red tape" every day.Would you want to pay for all that red tape? -
Wrong again (:akdiver voted AIP. -
I dunno why you think I voted for the republicans.Besides yourself and maybe one other Republican (you voted for them so you are one),
But I'll take the compliment, thanks.there has largely been piss poor arguments made against Obama's candidacy, embroiled in the most sensationalist, irrelevant and unsubstantiated garbage devoid of logic and the issues at hand. A few names of those with such horrible arguments include VW, metta, some dude with a chick in his avatar who's been on a tirade against Obama of late, Tamarasomething (just remember a camel), Gary, charles (really never made any argument, just was a fanboy), kaydee, zqt, LuckyStrike.. just to name a few. -
The change is taking my money and making it someone else's....
My first action as president...
in Off Topic
Posted