Jump to content

myohmyohmy

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by myohmyohmy

  1. 1 minute ago, wav_m said:

    Yeah, this site seems to suggest that USCIS being fee-based means it keeps ticking over as usual – at least it did during the last major shutdown. Hoping that's true! (I mean, I'm hoping there's no shutdown, but I think one can hope for the best while preparing for the absolutely unthinkably bad.)

    Same here, I was just expressing my worry without researching so don't listen to the shutdown thing.  The asylum and end of Title 42 I know it takes resources if there's a huge influx again.  My friend that worked there was explaining why, Something like a 180 day mandate by law to make a decision, some cases go to court some don't, he said it depends how they come in.  Oh well nothing I can do about it.

  2. 4 minutes ago, AndiB said:

    I dont like this view/concern about asylum seekers taking too many resources. They're not going to cause a slow down, I see this posted every month or so due to whatever else, last time all the mexicans just walking in was gonna cause a slow down.

     

    I also didn't think government shut down affected uscis? They're funding is almost entirely by users, not government 

    So you don't think it takes extra resources to process an influx?  My friend used to work for the USCIS (area different that what we are going through) and he did indicate they move people around due to the mandate that asylum seekers have to be approved in a certain amount of time.

     

    The potential shutdown maybe not, that's just another item I worry about but don't know much about.  I'm hoping neither!

  3. On 3/23/2023 at 5:13 PM, Ok-Mix said:

    I agree about the cases picking up and the faster rates!  The lucky ones of our month who get processed first, I'm actually speculating January 2024.  I hope and pray none of us here end up being the stragglers...!

    If everything continues as is I think we are looking at our group starting in December, at least according to the spreadsheet but who knows how accurate it is.  It indicates if they do 5,,000 a month like they are doing, it should start in 7.9 months.  I'm optimistic but there are a lot of potential obsticles like the end of Title 42 in May which will see a big increase in asylum seekers and a potential government shutdown in the fall, we will see....

  4. I'm a natural worrier so now I'm worried about May 12 when Title 42 expires and they anticipate a big increase in asylum seekers which takes away resources from other departments.  Then the fall will be the budget battle (different than the upcoming debt ceiling battle) but the budget has led to government shutdowns, including 35 days during the last administration.  And with congress in such disarray I'm not optimistic.  But there's nothing I can do so hopefully things work out.  

  5. On 3/25/2023 at 5:06 PM, Lynxyonok said:

    Sorry if mentioned earlier & a repost - but they did increase their processing time to 16.5 months now.

     

    Yes, more cases appear to be touched - but quite a few of those are August, September ones... and a lot of those are denials - likely for taking too long to respond to an RFE.

     

    I find it extremely puzzling that USCIS is yet to release Q12023 processing statistics. They are 3 months overdue - in the past these were available as quickly as a couple of weeks after a quarter. This is a major red flag for me.

     

    But at the same time my VJ timeline keeps shortening. Go figure...

     

    P.S. A fresh catch from my data mining: A 9/20/21 case got an initial RFE on 3/20/23. 18 months later. What. WAC2190138257.

    The current processing time is NOT16.5 months.  To get the 16.5 months they look at the past 6 months' of data and adjudicated cases, they then compute how long 80% of the adjudicated cases took.  Their processing times were slower in 2021 and 2022 as they had fewer resources plus covid disruptions.  So the cases that have been decided in the last 6 months were cases that started when they were much slower than now.  As the months progress this number will drop as it will start reflecting cases received and processed with the higher staffing/resource level.  16.5 is a lagging number and not representative of the current state.  

  6. They just barely started February and seem to be picking up steam at about 4,000 cases processed per month, if that remains accurate we (December 2022) will expect our group to start in 11.1 months (as of 3/23/2023).  But it does seem like they are doing closer to 4,500 a month starting in March if so, we can expect our group to start in about 10 months (as of 3/23/2023), I hope they keep the rate up!  but I am, for me, not anticipating anything before April 2024.

  7. 2 minutes ago, New Romantics said:

    I think this is the most accurate take. The 80% isn't as great of a stat as we think it is. It doesn't tell us much because we don't know how fast 65% or 75% or even 79% etc gets processed. Only 80%

    Took me forever to figure out the meaning and I work in numbers!  Basically the number to me means nothing although it would look better if lower.  I just did a simple example:

     

    Say October 2021 is 16.5 months ago and 1,000 people apply.  And NO one applies since.

     

    They get that 16.5 number by looking at "adjugated" cases, which means made a decision, in the last 6 months and use that number.  their definition is "This processing time is based on how long it took us to complete 80% of adjudicated cases over the past six months."   They are only looking at the past 6 months.

     

    Say 900 of the cases were approved in November 2021, this is not reflected in the 16.5 because only 6 months is included in the 16.5. Say the remaining 100 is completed in the last 6 month time frame, if you look at those 100, 80% would have been done in 16.5 months.  The others took longer.  But the point is 900 of the 1000 could be approved right away and that doesn't get reflected in the 16.5 as it's not an average.  Basically from my analysis the 16.5 means nothing.  That's how I read it.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  8. 14 minutes ago, GinoNiña said:

    Yeah! I still don’t understand the increased in processing time. Lots of feel good speculation here. 
    but I want to hear what the Uscis explanation is. 

    This doesn't necessarily mean the processing time increased.  It just means that, of the cases processed in the last 6 months, it took them 16.5 months to process 80%.  Of that 80%, 79% could have been approved the day after applying and the 1% could be decided in February 2023 and that's 80% in 16.5 months.

  9. This really doesn't mean much so I wouldn't worry.  That 16.5 month is based on the last 6 months applications that were processes/approved/denied, but it's NOT an average.  Say 16.5 months ago, we will say November 2021, 1,000 people applied and no one has applied since.  80% of those cases, 800, were processed within 16.5 months of submittal.  799 could have been processed in December 2021, 1 in February 2023  and that's 80% within 16.5 months.  Or 799 could be processed in February 2023 and 1 in December 2021, that's 80% within 16.5 months.  It doesn't mean much as it's not an average.  

  10. 1 hour ago, Crazy Cat said:

     You also omit the impact of the pandemic. Even through pandemic shutdowns and staffing limitations, the steady flow of applicants continued.  There is not a quick fix in sight, regardless of the promises politicians make.  As of the last USCIS stats I saw, USCIS was receiving twice as many petitions as they were processing.  Maybe a large increase in staffing will help. 

    My point was there are so many illegal people here and the fact the prior administration was antiimmigrant (for example, banning people from Arab countries) and slowed the process down.  They issued more RFEs, slowed interviews and thinned staff, they made it political.  Further, all administrations focus on employment (H1B and others) over k1s.  This is because USCIS is self funded and employers pay $2,500 and more.  And when it's self funded they can't hire more people unless their budget increases via fees, they are the rate division of government that is self funded and can't take money from the federal government.  So when you have an influx of asylum seekers, illegal crossers and illegal DACA people that don't have to pay the fee they can't keep up since they can't hire more.  And then you throw the pandemic on top of it and it's a system that is on the verge of collapse.  Wait until these politicicsns shut down the government later this year for weeks like they did last time, and this process will get even longer. Anyway I'm done with this thread.  Bye 

  11. 1 hour ago, SteveInBostonI130 said:

    Not really.

     

    My K1 in 2018 took 6 months for approval, 8 months total for my fiance to arrive in Boston (mid June 2018 to Feb 2019).

     

    Immigration timelines seem to be cyclical - it speeds up and slows down over the years.

     

    Unfortunately, nowadays it's on or near the top of the slow curve.

    I agree they go in cycles but never 15.5 months and it all started a few years ago when someone didn't want immigrants and made it tougher.  Plus COVID and illegal immigration surging due to the current administration= more delays.  I'm not solely blaming one party as each made it worse, I'm just saying it's never ever been 15.5 months and the system stinks when you follow procedures and are an honest citizen.  Illegal and you get special treatment.

  12. I just found this in another persons post and watched whoever is behind the youtube's presentation, it's really good!  Do what he says and complain to your congressman and senators and the President!

     

    "I follow https://www.youtube.com/@uscisanalysis who gives monthly updates on projections of how long you'll be waiting for NOA2 based on the data he's looking at and always under the assumption USCIS makes *zero* changes. His last one is before we really saw these improvements so will still say about 18months for Oct 2022 but hoping his next video shows it down to 15/16. He also just gives a good overview of how USCIS is doing week on week and how things have changed."

  13. I just found this in another persons post and watched whoever is behind the youtube's presentation, it's really good!  Do what he says and complain to your congressman and senators and the President!

     

    "I follow https://www.youtube.com/@uscisanalysis who gives monthly updates on projections of how long you'll be waiting for NOA2 based on the data he's looking at and always under the assumption USCIS makes *zero* changes. His last one is before we really saw these improvements so will still say about 18months for Oct 2022 but hoping his next video shows it down to 15/16. He also just gives a good overview of how USCIS is doing week on week and how things have changed."

  14. The whole process is so frustrating, it used to be faster but the last Administration slowed it down as they were anti-immigrant - they slow walked the process by increasing RFEs and interviews.  And then they shut down processing on top of it.  So frustrating, I'm just hoping mine is done before the next election in case more anti-immigrant politicians are elected.  I am glad I applied last year and not later this year or next!

  15. On 1/25/2023 at 6:33 PM, PK & S said:

    from the research my fiancé and i have done i only need my passport to enter and stay up to 90 days

    If that's true you have nothing to worry about, they don't care.  I go visit my same sex fiance in El Salvador and they never ask, just ask where you're staying.  They really don't care who it is and if you say friend that's fine, people all the time go to visit friends and stay with them. I think they have bigger issues than same sex relationships.

  16. On 1/13/2023 at 10:14 AM, Anna Hessler said:

    Hi! I hope this doesn't come across the wrong way, but I just wanted to share that the spousal visa is faster and cheaper at every step. In 90% of cases, the petition is approved sooner. And there is no need for AOS, the CR1 visa is a green card. The spousal service center is random, unlike the K1 that automatically goes to California. All the spousal service centers are averaging 10-12 months right now, with one exception. (The Vermont center is currently at 16 months.)

     

    The CR1 visa is better in every way, there are zero benefits to the K1 visa now. And with the AOS price hikes coming up, the spousal will be nearly $2,000 cheaper. 

     

    You're all so early in this process. If you can withdraw and file a spousal I would recommend it. Just a strangers two cents. Best of luck! 

    I would've gone down this route but unfortunately it's illegal for us to get married in El Salvador so we had no choice but to go the K-1 route.  Stinks but at least we can get married here hopefully before the supreme court changes it!

×
×
  • Create New...