Mike E

If I-751 is approved without an interview, he will be exposed to a finding of material misrepresentation. He needs to file AR-11, online, today, to update his physical address. When you move abroad, you will need to file I-865. Did he download his tax return transcripts?

People born in Northern Ireland are permitted to use Ireland as their country of chargeability, at least for DV.

1. It has been done before: 2. See above 3. In general COs want sponsors who have current W-2 income and W-2 income for the past 3 tax years that exceeds the I-864p requirements.

Send a new I-765 to the correct address, enclosing a copy of the I-485 receipt, and the I-129F approval.

Yes

Vitachek cheated me for $100, and all it delivered was a FedEx’d letter saying the State of Colorado did not have a divorce decree on record. You got off cheaply and you got results. You have just one copy, for a divorce that was 13 years ago. That is amazing. I have read horror stories of people divorced for decades whose county clerk of the court no longer had a record of divorce. You were fortunate. Protect that $32 document with extreme measures. Better yet skip lunch at work or any other discretionary expenditure for a while, and get more copies.

Is it Montreal or not? Actually no it would not, IMHO. This is because it varies by embassy and consulate. In our case, the embassy would not schedule an interview until we could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the sealed medical result was in hand. You will get a better answer if you: 1. identify the consulate 2. request the moderator move your topic to a country specific forum.

1. Credit card. It should be obvious when you get to the end of the online filing process. 2. yes 3. not a common problem. I have never heard of .gov being blocked by a foreign country. I suggest a side trip to Greece or Bulgaria where .gov is known to be accessible. How the heck does Turkey function as a NATO ally if it blocks .gov? The mind boggles.

Did you file I-751?

The same chapter that discusses the 4 year one day rule discusses the rule I described: https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-d-chapter-3 An applicant who is subject to a 5-year statutory period for naturalization is absent from the United States for 8 months, returning on August 1, 2018. The applicant has been absent from the United States for more than 6 months (180 days) but less than 1 year (365 days). As such, the applicant must be able to rebut the presumption of a break in the continuity of residence in order to meet the continuous residence requirement for naturalization. If the applicant is unable to rebut the presumption, he or she must wait until at least 6 months from reaching the 5-year anniversary of the newly established statutory period following the applicant’s return to the United States. In this example, the newly established statutory period began on August 1, 2018, when the applicant returned to the United States. Therefore, the earliest the applicant may re-apply for naturalization is February 1, 2023, which is at least 6 months from the 5-year anniversary of the pertinent statutory period.[18] Ignore the nonsense about 6 calendar months. Every ISO I have encountered uses 180 days, and even Jim Hacking says it is 182.5 days, and even then only if he is appealing a case. I do not advise you to try this rule. Any LPR that draws attention to an absence of more than 180 days is at risk. You were not paying rent; you clearly abandoned LPR status.