Jump to content
Niths

F4 Interview experience and help

 Share

19 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Niths said:

I came across this post and it was a similar situation to mine. The older son had aged out but was listed in the interview letter and medical. The son showed up and had his visa approved. 

 

How does this make sense? Is it up to the interviewing officer to decide? The officer said there was no record for me at all so there was nothing they could do. 

Based purely on the information in that post, and assuming the OP did not unintentionally misrepresent anything, the officer made an error issuing the person the visa. CSPA is embedded in law, it is not discretionary or up to the officer to decide. It is quite possible that the person will get his green card revoked if they look at it again (for example if he applies for naturalization) and they realize it was issued in error. 
 

Are you sure no-one asked to put you back on the case? If a request comes in to do so NVC will follow it regardless of their opinion of the merits. We’ve seen this before. Other than that…then unfortunately yes it may be an error on someone’s part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SusieQQQ said:

Based purely on the information in that post, and assuming the OP did not unintentionally misrepresent anything, the officer made an error issuing the person the visa. CSPA is embedded in law, it is not discretionary or up to the officer to decide. It is quite possible that the person will get his green card revoked if they look at it again (for example if he applies for naturalization) and they realize it was issued in error. 
 

Are you sure no-one asked to put you back on the case? If a request comes in to do so NVC will follow it regardless of their opinion of the merits. We’ve seen this before. Other than that…then unfortunately yes it may be an error on someone’s part.

When I was removed from the case due to aging out, I think I had reached out to find out if we can appeal/be considered again. So perhaps they did add me back in but the Consulate did not approve my visa. 

 

When you have seen others request to be added back on the case, what was the outcome of those scenarios?

 

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Niths said:

When I was removed from the case due to aging out, I think I had reached out to find out if we can appeal/be considered again. So perhaps they did add me back in but the Consulate did not approve my visa. 

 

When you have seen others request to be added back on the case, what was the outcome of those scenarios?

 

Thank you!

My understanding is that NVC usually warns the applicant that it is up to them to determine if they actually qualify for a visa when adding them back. Just being listed does not mean you get a visa. The CSPA age needs to be under 21 as at the date a visa becomes for you to be eligible. We have sadly seen a number of people here get denied a visa under such circumstances - convinced they would get a visa because they were listed on the application but denied because they had aged out. There are cases where NVC has removed someone in error (turned 21 but still eligible under CSPA) and obviously those people were successful after being reinstated on the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SusieQQQ said:

My understanding is that NVC usually warns the applicant that it is up to them to determine if they actually qualify for a visa when adding them back. Just being listed does not mean you get a visa. The CSPA age needs to be under 21 as at the date a visa becomes for you to be eligible. We have sadly seen a number of people here get denied a visa under such circumstances - convinced they would get a visa because they were listed on the application but denied because they had aged out. There are cases where NVC has removed someone in error (turned 21 but still eligible under CSPA) and obviously those people were successful after being reinstated on the case.

Ok, this makes more sense now. You're right, I must have been added back on because I requested it. We really thought it was at the discretion of the visa officer even if I had aged out. Gosh, we were so wrong!

 

Thanks for your help:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...