Spiderman 3

[fozzie 41]

I have to say that i was a little disappointed with the 3rd spidey movie. I loved the whole darker side and the fight scenes but generally i thought it was the weakest of the 3 movies. I love the first 2. The bes stuff in this movie is actually the comedy. When PP is walking down the street mking guns at womenn then the whole dancing in the bar stuff made me crack up.

And as for bruce campbells pperformance as the french matre'd, brilliant.

All the lovey dovey stuff really ruins the movie and is very contrived. Worth a watch but dont expect too much from this weak script.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I thought it was ok (better than #1 less so than #2). It was let down by some really bad acting on the part of some no-name actors playing journalists and the Spiderman "fan club".

[Caladan 19]

It was okay. Cinematically very good (especially the Sandman), and they've obviously upgraded their computer software a bit. But it felt like they were juggling one too many plotlines, and they just missed on nailing the right sort of tone to get the revenge story to be moving.

They didn't quite get the dialogue right this time, either, especially at the Daily Bugle.

On the other hand? Goblin-on-a-snowboard? Kickass.

[Reba 2]

I quite enjoyed it, except for the opening chase scense between Goblin Jr. and Peter. It made me dizzy. And it dragged on a bit too long.

I think any love scene with Kirsten Dunst is going to feel contrived anyway, she's just so blah. So is James Franco. Both of them bore me to tears.

Bruce was of course brilliant, with his most screen time and dialogue to date in the Spidey movies I think. So funny!

I was pleasantly surprised by Topher Grace actually, he played the villain well. As did Thomas Hayden Church.

And the blobby black stuff did well too.

[Jenn! 918]

I thought it was great!!!! I tend not to look too deeply into action movies regarding the quality of the writing or acting though, so I wasn't disappointed.

[MaydayDas 1]

Honestly I was not so impress about ....I was expected more...maybe no 4 will be better

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Without wanting to spoil anything for people who haven't seen it....

The stuff with Harry Osbourn seemed rather rushed to me. Never really dealt with the emotional baggage over his fathers death in a very effective way - and the storyline was wasted with some crappy exposition with the old butler. You know you're in trouble when you have to rely on a tertiary supporting character to resolve a storyline you've been building over 3 movies with a throwaway line.