Jump to content

105 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Mexico
Timeline
Posted
what bout the bunch of k1'ers that want to stablish credit but can't because they don't have yet their ss# or a credit history??

i've seen a looooottt of complaints here bout that.. so.. what's the big deal?

Those numbers are small compare to the number of illegal immigrants crossing our borders.

well, they aren't the first to do it.. sprint does it.. u only need a passport or a consular id and a paystub to get a cellphone.. i don't see the big issue here, it's legit biz, it's so good, that even companies that didn't accept those documents before (cingular) accept them now..

El Presidente of VJ

regalame una sonrisita con sabor a viento

tu eres mi vitamina del pecho mi fibra

tu eres todo lo que me equilibra,

un balance, lo que me conplementa

un masajito con sabor a menta,

Deutsch: Du machst das richtig

Wohnen Heute

3678632315_87c29a1112_m.jpgdancing-bear.gif

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Not to rain on the parade, but Bank of America has always been recommended around here, at least, as the credit card for an international student to get because it didn't require excessive documentation or a credit history, and it would let you secure a low-ceiling credit card with cash.

And technically, the only thing a social security number is required for is reporting income. It's one way of verifying identity, and an easy one, but not legally required (or really all that sensible, if you think about it.)

AOS

-

Filed: 8/1/07

NOA1:9/7/07

Biometrics: 9/28/07

EAD/AP: 10/17/07

EAD card ordered again (who knows, maybe we got the two-fer deal): 10/23/-7

Transferred to CSC: 10/26/07

Approved: 11/21/07

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Mexico
Timeline
Posted (edited)
Not to rain on the parade, but Bank of America has always been recommended around here, at least, as the credit card for an international student to get because it didn't require excessive documentation or a credit history, and it would let you secure a low-ceiling credit card with cash.

And technically, the only thing a social security number is required for is reporting income. It's one way of verifying identity, and an easy one, but not legally required (or really all that sensible, if you think about it.)

exactly.. the SS# stuff was thanks to Paranoia act, i mean Patriot act.. and if I'd known about it, I'd have gone to BOA too.. first time I tried to bank was at Wachovia, they tried to get everything, letter from my grandma, letter from my employer that I was working for them because I was a resident. a bunch of BS if you ask me.. so I went to the state bank, since my wife is a state employee, I just gave them my drivers license, my SS# card, and some money and that was it, bank account..

Edited by pedroh

El Presidente of VJ

regalame una sonrisita con sabor a viento

tu eres mi vitamina del pecho mi fibra

tu eres todo lo que me equilibra,

un balance, lo que me conplementa

un masajito con sabor a menta,

Deutsch: Du machst das richtig

Wohnen Heute

3678632315_87c29a1112_m.jpgdancing-bear.gif

Posted
what bout the bunch of k1'ers that want to stablish credit but can't because they don't have yet their ss# or a credit history??

i've seen a looooottt of complaints here bout that.. so.. what's the big deal?

What part of "ilegal inmigrante" don't you understand.. Are you seriously going to sit here and compare a K1 visa holder to an illegal immigrant..

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Filed: Other Timeline
Posted
It's business.

And so is dope dealing, narcotics smuggling, pimping, kiddie porn, etc. It doesn't make it right and just because they (BoA) can do it...doesn't mean they should do it! :angry:

No, those are crimes. Offering a legitimate banking product to customers is hardly apples to apples, peejay.

Offering legitimate banking products to illegal aliens should be a crime. Along with employing them illegally!

Employing them illegally already is a crime.

Posted
exactly.. the SS# stuff was thanks to Paranoia act, i mean Patriot act.. and if I'd known about it, I'd have gone to BOA too.. first time I tried to bank was at Wachovia, they tried to get everything, letter from my grandma, letter from my employer that I was working for them because I was a resident. a bunch of BS if you ask me.. so I went to the state bank, since my wife is a state employee, I just gave them my drivers license, my SS# card, and some money and that was it, bank account..

Sorry dude this ain't Mexico. If companies in the US conducted business the Mexican way this country would have ended up a Mexico.. This is a matter of national security. Or are you endorsing anyone under the sun ,from south America, should be able to walk into this country, steal jobs from Americans and now setup financial accounts..

How would you like it if someone did the same thing with their buddies and camped inside your house??

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Posted
Bank of America is a private corporation. What's the issue here?

So you must be okay with people of middle eastern decent not being able to open financial accounts without proper authorization, while "illegal" immigrants get a get-out-of-jail free pass..

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline
Posted
Bank of America is a private corporation. What's the issue here?

So you must be okay with people of middle eastern decent not being able to open financial accounts without proper authorization, while "illegal" immigrants get a get-out-of-jail free pass..

No. I just find it ironic that the same people who usually are so adamant against government involvement in corporations' practices get up in arms when you add illegal immigrants into the mix.

Posted
No. I just find it ironic that the same people who usually are so adamant against government involvement in corporations' practices get up in arms when you add illegal immigrants into the mix.

I don't know what you are talking about because I am all for the country's government policing companies and drawing lines in the sand.. For example, to open up a bank account in Australia one needs to pass a 100 point ID check..

This is where the US government has to get with the program and be proactive rather than relying on rules created 80 years or simply being reactive to events such as terrorism.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Posted
What's Middle Eastern decent?

"descent"

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline
Posted
No. I just find it ironic that the same people who usually are so adamant against government involvement in corporations' practices get up in arms when you add illegal immigrants into the mix.

I don't know what you are talking about because I am all for the country's government policing companies and drawing lines in the sand.. For example, to open up a bank account in Australia one needs to pass a 100 point ID check..

This is where the US government has to get with the program and be proactive rather than relying on rules created 80 years or simply being reactive to events such as terrorism.

So then you object to Bank of America's lax policy due to potential terrorism rather than because the policy "encourages" the presence of illegal immigrants?

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...