The Civil War of 2016

[X Factor 1,113]

The Civil War of 2016

Imagine Tea Party extremists seizing control of a South Carolina town and the Army being sent in to crush the rebellion. This farcical vision is now part of the discussion in professional military circles.

At issue is an article in the respected Small Wars Journal titled “Full Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A ‘Vision’ of the Future.” It was written by retired Army Col. Kevin Benson of the Army's University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., and Jennifer Weber, a Civil War expert at the University of Kansas. It posits an “extremist militia motivated by the goals of the ‘tea party’ movement” seizing control of Darlington, S.C., in 2016, “occupying City Hall, disbanding the city council and placing the mayor under house arrest.” The rebels set up checkpoints on Interstate 95 and Interstate 20 looking for illegal aliens. It’s a cartoonish and needlessly provocative scenario.

The article is a choppy patchwork of doctrinal jargon and liberal nightmare. The authors make a quasi-legal case for military action and then apply the Army’s Operating Concept 2016-2028 to the situation. They write bloodlessly that “once it is put into play, Americans will expect the military to execute without pause and as professionally as if it were acting overseas.” They claim that “the Army cannot disappoint the American people, especially in such a moment,” not pausing to consider that using such efficient, deadly force against U.S. citizens would create a monumental political backlash and severely erode government legitimacy.

The vision is hard to take seriously. As retired ArmyBrig. Gen. Russell D. Howard, a former professor at West Point, observed earlier in his career, “I am a colonel, colonels write a lot of crazy stuff, but no one listens to colonels, so I don’t see the problem.” Twenty years ago, then-Air Force Lt. Col. Charles J. Dunlap Jr. created a stir with an article in Parameters titled “The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012.” It carried a disclaimer that the coup scenario was “purely a literary device intended to dramatize my concern over certain contemporary developments affecting the armed forces, and is emphatically not a prediction.”

The scenario presented in Small Wars Journal isn’t a literary device but an operational lay-down intended to present the rationale and mechanisms for Americans to fight Americans. Col. Benson and Ms. Weber contend, “Army officers are professionally obligated to consider the conduct of operations on U.S. soil.” This is a dark, pessimistic and wrongheaded view of what military leaders should spend their time studying.

A professor at the Joint Forces Staff College was relieved of duty in June for uttering the heresy that the United States is at war with Islam. The Obama administration contended the professor had to be relieved because what he was teaching was not U.S. policy. Because there is no disclaimer attached to the Small Wars piece, it is fair to ask, at least in Col. Benson’s case, whether his views reflect official policy regarding the use of U.S. military force against American citizens.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/7/the-civil-war-of-2016/

[X Factor 1,113]

If ever this scenerio plays out, there will be mass desertions from the military.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

spare some tin foil?

[Danno 1,228]

Why SC?

Actually there was some group that headed up a movement for "like minded" people to relocate to SC to democratically "take over the place".

Not sure how that is working out.... and why you would want that piece of real estate anyway but from what I gather there has been a migration to another region of the country which is much more realistic.

[X Factor 1,113]

The National Guard would be constitutionally empowered to stop the rebellion; the general Army would not in this scenerio.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Why SC?

Is that a trick question?

[Danno 1,228]

Is that a trick question?

Not really I have been to SC a lot, the only place I found that had any appeal was Savannah...... oph wait, thats Ga.

[abner137 48]

Not really I have been to SC a lot, the only place I found that had any appeal was Savannah...... oph wait, thats Ga.

Myrtle.....

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

The National Guard would be constitutionally empowered to stop the rebellion; the general Army would not in this scenerio.

The national Guard could be federalized with the stroke of a pen.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

The national Guard could be federalized with the stroke of a pen.

That is generally done to take the Guard out of the control of a state governor. Federal troops are much more restrained because of posse comitatus than are state troops.

Edited August 10, 2012 by The Patriot

[justashooter 430]

Small Wars Journal has a strange forum. lots of unusual stuff posted there. most of it is re-hashing of history, or posits of possibilities. little is of relevance to non-members, or even intellegible to them...

[SMR 368]

Why would you occupy City Hall?

Considering actions on American Soil is the fundamental duty of the American military. I don't know why we moved away from that. It's just that the goal is preventing foreign attack and invasion, not oppressing citizens.