Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Vi-Jay

GOP Presses NLRB to Drop Case Against Boeing

9 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Published June 17, 2011

FoxNews.com

Republicans are calling on the National Labor Relations Board to dismiss its complaint against Boeing and get out of the way of job creation, though Democrats argue Boeing is violating the law by retaliating against union employees.

The NLRB has charged that Boeing built an assembly line for its new 787 aircraft in South Carolina to retaliate against its unionized workers in Washington state for past strikes and to avoid future labor unrest. Boeing has disputed the complaint, saying no union workers lost jobs. In South Carolina, workers don't have to join a union to work at a job site, making it a so-called right-to-work state.

At a congressional hearing Friday in South Carolina, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said that the NLRB is jeopardizing thousands of jobs in the state with its complaint -- a state grappling with 9.8 percent unemployment. The $750 million plant is the largest single industrial investment in South Carolina history.

"Why would the administration stand in the way of reindustrialization of the American workforce and strengthening one of the major industries where we still have a competitive global advantage?" Issa said.

Sen. Lindsey Graham issued a statement for the hearing, saying, "If the NLRB is allowed to overrule Boeing's business decision, there are no winners. ... The repercussions of this case will ensure that businesses will simply decide to move operations overseas. South Carolina has seen what happens when businesses find better opportunities overseas -- the jobs leave and they don't come back."

On Thursday, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley and 15 other GOP governors wrote to NLRB general counsel Lafe Solomon on Thursday saying the probe hamstrings governors who are trying to create jobs.

The letter was released Friday as the hearing began meeting in North Charleston. It was expected to last most of the day.

But Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., said the case wasn't about creating jobs in South Carolina or Everett Washington, but rather about a company that thinks it is above the law.

"At issue in the Boeing case is whether Boeing illegally retaliated against American workers for engaging in activity that Congress has chosen to protect since 1935 and FDR the right to protest," she said.

"I support creating great jobs and reducing unemployment across the United States. But I also believe that Boeing is not above the law. And as members of Congress we should not set aside the law to give preferred treatment to any one company."

Solomon told the committee that a thorough investigation led him to believe that the National Labor Relations Act had been violated.

"The issuance of the complaint was not intended to harm the workers of South Carolina, but rather to protect the rights of workers regardless of where they are employed, to engage in activities protected by the National Labor Relations Act without fearing discrimination," he said.

"Boeing has every right to manufacture planes in South Carolina or anywhere else, for that matter, as long as those decisions are based on legitimate business considerations."

Solomon attempted to avoid Friday's field hearing by offering testimony of "another NLRB official who has not direct involvement in the pending Boeing case," according to congressional Democrats. Issa rejected the offer and insisted Solomon testify, they said.

________________________________________________________________

Obviously this administration wants to create jobs as long as they are union jobs. :angry:

Thanks+Obama.jpg

And now you won't let my daddy get a job! :angry:

Edited by Vi-Jay

Be Shrewd! Be Astute and be aware who's watching ya!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Country: England
Timeline

Does this administration want Boeing to succeed with the troubled 787 Dreamliner? It's already a long way behind schedule and will need as much industrial advantage as it can get, or Airbus and the A350 stand by to pick up the pieces. The South Carolina plant represents an investment by Boeing in jobs and in their product. The NLRB action jeopardises both.

Handily lost in all the fuss is the fact that Boeing remains committed to job creation in Washington State, where the USAF's new Frankentanker is currently scheduled to be produced. Reports have the recent Boeing job creation in the Everett area as an additional 2 - 3,000 new jobs (and I'm still trying to find the time period for that number).

This action needs to go away and do so before it affects production of the 787.


Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this administration want Boeing to succeed with the troubled 787 Dreamliner? It's already a long way behind schedule and will need as much industrial advantage as it can get, or Airbus and the A350 stand by to pick up the pieces. The South Carolina plant represents an investment by Boeing in jobs and in their product. The NLRB action jeopardises both.

Handily lost in all the fuss is the fact that Boeing remains committed to job creation in Washington State, where the USAF's new Frankentanker is currently scheduled to be produced. Reports have the recent Boeing job creation in the Everett area as an additional 2 - 3,000 new jobs (and I'm still trying to find the time period for that number).

This action needs to go away and do so before it affects production of the 787.

:thumbs:


Be Shrewd! Be Astute and be aware who's watching ya!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Timeline
Does this administration want Boeing to succeed with the troubled 787 Dreamliner? It's already a long way behind schedule and will need as much industrial advantage as it can get, or Airbus and the A350 stand by to pick up the pieces. The South Carolina plant represents an investment by Boeing in jobs and in their product. The NLRB action jeopardises both.

I agree. These are quality jobs producing what gears up to be a successful product - an export product no less - which will benefit the economy. There's not much that can be said in support of any roadblocks being thrown by the administration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. These are quality jobs producing what gears up to be a successful product - an export product no less - which will benefit the economy. There's not much that can be said in support of any roadblocks being thrown by the administration.

Well, then why are you pissing on my shoes. Let me hate a little. FYI, the little girl flipping OM the bird makes me feel better. :star:


Be Shrewd! Be Astute and be aware who's watching ya!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...