Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
peejay

Congressman urges lawsuit on Utah immigration law

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Congressman urges lawsuit on Utah immigration law

The Associated Press

Monday, April 25, 2011 | 3:06 a.m.

The Texas congressman who heads the U.S. House Judiciary Committee has accused the Justice Department of being "hypocritical" for not pursuing legal action against a Utah law approving a guest worker program for illegal immigrants.

U.S. Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said in a letter Monday to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder that the Utah law approving the program is unconstitutional, and called the department's inaction a "stark contrast" to the federal government's lawsuit against Arizona for a law "that merely complements and assists in the enforcement of federal immigration law."

"This is hypocritical. If (the Justice Department) chooses not to take legal action against Utah's unconstitutional law, it will be clear the Administration bases their decisions on their own political views rather than constitutional principle," Smith said in a statement to The Associated Press.

The Utah law doesn't take effect for two years, which state officials said was done specifically to avert a lawsuit. The state is seeking a federal waiver.

In his letter, Smith said the government's inaction would reinforce the perception that it only opposes strict enforcement measures such as Arizona's law.

In its challenge to Arizona's law, the Justice Department argued the measure intrudes on its exclusive authority to regulate immigration, disrupts U.S.-Mexico relations, hinders cooperation between state and federal officials, and puts burdens on legal immigrants. A federal judge put key parts of that law on hold last July, a ruling the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld earlier this month.

Smith said that if Obama's administration "is serious about having a uniform immigration policy rather than a 'patchwork' of state immigration laws you profess to oppose, then the Administration needs to take action against the Utah law."

A showdown with federal officials is the last thing Utah wants, the state's Attorney General Mark Shurtleff said. He and Utah Gov. Gary Herbert have met with federal officials, including members of the Justice Department.

Shurtleff, a Republican, said Smith's letter is not only wrong, but strictly political.

"He's riding right along the line of the hard right wing radicals," said Shurtleff. "He's trying to stick his nose into Utah's business and play politics."

Herbert said the lawsuit threat was "typical Washington" and that legal action would be a waste of time.

"The people of the U.S. would be better served if the federal government used the time between now and 2013 to actually address immigration, rather than sue Utah for trying to manage the practical realities we face as states due to the absence of federal action," Herbert said.

A Justice Department spokeswoman said the letter was being reviewed.

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer's lawyers has argued the federal government hasn't effectively enforced immigration law and that the state's intent in passing the law was to assist federal authorities, as Congress has encouraged.

Utah's guest worker program was part of an immigration reform package signed into law March 15 by Utah's governor. The package included an enforcement measure that was modeled on Arizona's law that goes into effect in May.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/apr/25/us-immigration-reform-utah/


"Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave."

"...for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process."

US Congresswoman Barbara Jordan (D-TX)

Testimony to the House Immigration Subcommittee, February 24, 1995

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't see anything wrong, if someone finds Arizona's laws going out of bound and they feel they are interferring in the Federal working then same applies to Utah too.

Utah should not be able to make its law for letting illegal immigrant work and giving them legal status.

That should be the Feds job to come up with immigration laws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't see anything wrong, if someone finds Arizona's laws going out of bound and they feel they are interferring in the Federal working then same applies to Utah too.

Utah should not be able to make its law for letting illegal immigrant work and giving them legal status.

That should be the Feds job to come up with immigration laws.

So why does Obummer's Justice Department jump on AZ in a NY second for anti-illegal alien state legislation, but hasn't done anything to UT in regards to its pro-illegal alien state legislation?

It appears as if Obummer and his lackies pick and choose their constitutional battles according to their own personal agendas and the agendas of their buddies rather than holding to the constitution as they publicly stated when they put the full force of Federal resouces against AZ.

The constitution is only convenient when it is to their benefit. Otherwise it is ignored and circumvented.

Nothing new here. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy and sleaze. Take it or leave it. It's just something else to digest before 2012.


"Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave."

"...for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process."

US Congresswoman Barbara Jordan (D-TX)

Testimony to the House Immigration Subcommittee, February 24, 1995

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×