Dem Senators, led by Rockefeller seek to restrict the EPA's regulation of CO2

[JohnSmith2007 353]

Rockefeller: Don't put fate of an entire industry in EPA's hands

By Pete Kasperowicz - 02/01/11 11:20 AM ET

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) introduced a bill last night that would delay the ability of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act, and in a lengthy accompanying statement, sounded like many of the Republicans who have opposed the EPA on CO2.

"One thing we should never do is put the fate of an entire industry into the hands of the Environmental Protection Agency," Rockefeller said in remarks submitted for the Congressional Record.

Rockefeller was criticizing the EPA's new policy of regulating CO2 for expanding factories. He said it will hurt U.S. job creation and warned that the EPA will soon seek to regulate CO2 in all factories, even those that are not planning to expand.

"The impact of these rules is that companies will sit on the sidelines and opportunities for innovation and job creation will be lost," he said. "Because of these new rules companies won't build that new factory. They won't build that new power plant. And so they won't employ some of the millions of Americans who are out of work. That is why I believe these regulations need to be suspended."

Rockefeller stressed that he believes climate change is an important issue, but said "the lead should come from Congress and not the EPA."

"Congress, unlike the EPA, can craft proposals that reduce greenhouse gases while simultaneously protecting our economy," he said. "Most importantly, Congress is directly accountable to the people whose lives we impact."

He also argued that EPA's approach does not take into account the differences in energy use across the states, and said plainly that coal-generated electricity "will not change anytime soon."

"The fact is, we in West Virginia know and embrace what too many others either don't understand or refuse to see, which is that our nation and countries around the world are dependent on coal," he said. "That is not something that will change when half the globe is struggling to rise out of poverty."

The bill, S. 231, is co-sponsored by Sens. Jim Webb (D-Va.), Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), Tim Johnson (D-S.D.), Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) and Kent Conrad (D-N.D.).

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/141433-rockefeller-dont-put-the-fate-of-an-entire-industry-in-epas-hands

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Without coal, there would be no West Virginia.

[JohnSmith2007 353]

Without coal, there would be no West Virginia.

Or a substantial portion of our electricity.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

If they don't do this, the Republican house will de-fund any attempt to do so.