Jump to content
one...two...tree

Levin To Ex-Goldman Partner: 'Should Goldman Sachs Be Trying To Sell A Sh--ty Deal?'

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted (edited)



Let the expletives fly.

Moments ago, Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) had a swear-laced exchange with former Goldman Sachs partner Daniel Sparks during today's Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations hearing. The subcommittee is part of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

"Boy," Levin said, reading from an internal June 22, 2007 Goldman email, "that Timberwolf was one shitty deal."

"How much of that shitty deal did you sell to your clients after June 22, 2007?" Levin asked Sparks.

"Mr. Chairman, I don't know the answer to that, but the price would have reflected levels that they wanted to invest in at the time."

Levin
: But you didn't tell them you thought it was a shitty deal.
Sparks
: I didn't say that.


Levin
: No. Who did? Your people. Internally. You knew it was a shitty deal and that's what your email shows.


Sparks tried to recast the meaning of that email -- that it was his performance on the deal that wasn't good, rather than the deal itself -- but Levin was having none of it.

Goldman sold hundreds of millions of dollars on that product after the email was sent, Levin said, and selling it was a "top priority."

"Should Goldman Sachs be trying to sell a shitty deal?" Levin demanded. "Can you answer that one yes or no?"

Sparks didn't.

Edited by El Buscador
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted

The hearings were on CNBC all day. They were hysterical, mostly.

We have TV monitors on the trading floors tuned to CNBC all day long every day. Most of the time they just fade to the background and get ignored, unless there's some news moving the markets. But today the Goldman hearings were live throughout the day, and we were all watching. I thought Claire McCaskill was best. She literally ripped them new azzholes with every new line of attack she took. Of course, it's all just grandstanding so that they can look good in their hometown papers the next day, and of course it doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things. But it was awfully fun to watch. Much better than rubbernecking at a freeway pileup.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...