Jump to content

59 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

Libs sure like to use cartoons and childish imagery to illustrate what the are trying to say. Remind me a lot of children.

K-1 Visa

Service Center : California Service Center

Consulate : Manila, Philippines

I-129F Sent : 2009-08-14

I-129F NOA1 : 2009-08-18

I-129F NOA2 : 2009-10-23

NVC Received : 2009-10-27

NVC Left : 2009-11-06

Consulate Received : 2009-11-12

Packet 3 Received : 2009-11-27

Interview Date : 2009-12-16

Interview Result : APPROVED

Second Interview

(If Required):

Second Interview Result:

Visa Received :

US Entry :

Marriage :

Comments :

Processing

Estimates/Stats : Your I-129f was approved in 66 days from your NOA1 date.

Your interview took 120 days from your I-129F NOA1 date.

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

jackson-190.jpg

Least she is a chemical engineer, but worked in government all of her life with really no practical industrial experience. Can only wonder if her donating 200 bucks to Obama got her that job.

From: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/11/us/polit...eb-jackson.html

"December 11, 2008 The New Team

Lisa P. Jackson

By DAVID KOCIENIEWSKI As he prepares to take office, President-elect Barack Obama is relying on a small team of advisers who will lead his transition operation and help choose the members of his administration. Following is part of a series of profiles of potential members of the administration.

Name: Lisa P. Jackson

Being Considered For: Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency

Would bring to the job: Twenty years of experience as an environmental regulator and a reputation as a consensus builder. Ms. Jackson, who is a chemical engineer, brought a more policy-driven approach to New Jersey’s historically politicized Department of Environmental Protection as its commissioner. During her 33 months in that job, the state began conducting compliance sweeps to crack down on polluters in environmentally ravaged sections of Camden and Paterson, ended its controversial bear hunt and unveiled a plan to reduce carbon emissions 20 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050.

Is linked to Mr. Obama by: His transition team. Like her boss, Gov. Jon S. Corzine, Ms. Jackson supported Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton over Mr. Obama in the Democratic presidential primaries. Besides making a $1,000 donation to Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign in 2007, Ms. Jackson was an at-large delegate pledged to Mrs. Clinton; only later in 2008 did she donate $200 to the Obama campaign. Shortly after she was named Mr. Corzine’s chief of staff in late October — taking over on Dec. 1, becoming the first woman and first African American to hold the post — she was chosen by President-elect Obama in mid-November to serve on his transition panel for energy and the environment.

In her own words: “When it comes to the auto industry, the E.P.A. apparently is the Emissions Permissions Agency.” (Announcing in December 2007 that New Jersey would join other states in suing the Bush administration for its ruling that prevented states from enacting tougher fuel efficiency standards, a decision she called “a horrendous change of course.”)

Used to work as: An administrator in the federal Environmental Protection Agency for 16 years, where her duties included regulating the cleanup of hazardous waste sites under the Superfund program. She also ran various enforcement programs at both the E.P.A. and New Jersey’s Department of Environmental Protection, as well as New Jersey’s Land Use Management Program.

Carries as baggage: The E.P.A. criticized New Jersey in a recent report for moving too slowly to clean up some toxic waste sites. Some environmentalists also say she caved in to pressure from big business by supporting a plan that would privatize cleanup of hazardous waste sites, and from developers by diluting a proposal to enact stricter groundwater quality standards.

Also known for: Although her tenure at the Department of Environmental Protection involved dealing with an assortment of volatile political issues, Ms. Jackson’s measured approach won praise even from those who opposed her decisions; those diplomatic skills led Mr. Corzine to name her his chief of staff.

Biography: Born Feb. 8, 1962, in Philadelphia; adopted a few weeks later and raised in the Ninth Ward in New Orleans. ... first in her class at St. Mary’s Dominican High School (she once described her academic career, saying, “I was a straight ‘A’ student — a geek basically.”). ... graduated summa cum laude from Tulane University’s School of Chemical Engineering and earned a master’s in chemical engineering from Princeton University. ... She lives with her husband, Kenny Jackson, and their two sons in East Windsor, N.J. ... an avid cook, her signature dish — gumbo — is a tribute to her Louisiana roots. ... renowned for her annual Mardi Gras party, which she has not thrown since Hurricane Katrina devastated her hometown in 2005."

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
Wait a minute, I am confused by the shell game.

You are calling it "Global warming" again..... has or has not the earth (globe) actually been cooling for the last decade?

Has it? Try the last 11 years, and call it weather patterns as the deniers (channeling BY: aka The idiots) seem to do.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

I heard this story on the radio this morning. While I tend to agree that perhaps its not the best approach to deal with the obvious; I think that years of inactivity by the nation's governmental protection agency for the environment requires action to bypass lobbying by politically motivated parties that obviously obfuscate real science.

And down the line, the effects DO affect human health- from food availability down to simple logistical access to water. Of course we;ll hear arguments from pig-headed individuals echoing the conspiracy bullsh!t line, but most rationally-minded folks will come to understand the rationale behind this kind of action.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

NickD brings up the extreme case of Hypercapnia- or CO2 poisoning. I can't remember offhand how many PPMs of CO2 (AND CO2 equivalents... as these are also being ruled now by the EPA, just in case any deniars of CO2 want to consider methane, etc.) in a gaseous volume you'd need to induce it in humans and other mammals. But to kick start the entire cascade of chain events, starting with those idiots that claim that more CO2 = more plant biomass, we need to consider that CO2 reaches toxic levels for plants as well in the thousands of PPM. Not that far off from the current level that hovers around 400ppm.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
NickD brings up the extreme case of Hypercapnia- or CO2 poisoning. I can't remember offhand how many PPMs of CO2 (AND CO2 equivalents... as these are also being ruled now by the EPA, just in case any deniars of CO2 want to consider methane, etc.) in a gaseous volume you'd need to induce it in humans and other mammals. But to kick start the entire cascade of chain events, starting with those idiots that claim that more CO2 = more plant biomass, we need to consider that CO2 reaches toxic levels for plants as well in the thousands of PPM. Not that far off from the current level that hovers around 400ppm.

Well since we are carbon units, my source is that Star Trek series, it would not be in the best interest for the environment for the government to burn us on this issue.

Gather that CO2 levels at around 15,000 ppm can have very negative affects on humans, 7.5% or 75,000 ppm would be deadly. In crowded assemblies like a theater or a church with very poor air exchange rates due to the high cost of energy, notice adverse symptoms at 400 ppm, yawning is key symptom, but also may be caused by pure boredom. More research is needed in this area.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
NickD brings up the extreme case of Hypercapnia- or CO2 poisoning. I can't remember offhand how many PPMs of CO2 (AND CO2 equivalents... as these are also being ruled now by the EPA, just in case any deniars of CO2 want to consider methane, etc.) in a gaseous volume you'd need to induce it in humans and other mammals. But to kick start the entire cascade of chain events, starting with those idiots that claim that more CO2 = more plant biomass, we need to consider that CO2 reaches toxic levels for plants as well in the thousands of PPM. Not that far off from the current level that hovers around 400ppm.

Well since we are carbon units, my source is that Star Trek series, it would not be in the best interest for the environment for the government to burn us on this issue.

Gather that CO2 levels at around 15,000 ppm can have very negative affects on humans, 7.5% or 75,000 ppm would be deadly. In crowded assemblies like a theater or a church with very poor air exchange rates due to the high cost of energy, notice adverse symptoms at 400 ppm, yawning is key symptom, but also may be caused by pure boredom. More research is needed in this area.

Actually, CO2 headaches start at around 5000ppm. 40,000ppm is imminently dangerous to human life.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

Quick, does anyone know which which pollutants are decreasing in the U.S. and which pollutant sources have decreased as well?

My guess is no one will know this one as they believe this country is getting progressively more polluted.

David & Lalai

th_ourweddingscrapbook-1.jpg

aneska1-3-1-1.gif

Greencard Received Date: July 3, 2009

Lifting of Conditions : March 18, 2011

I-751 Application Sent: April 23, 2011

Biometrics: June 9, 2011

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
A better question would be... what pollutants (and sources) are decreasing at a significant level?

If Gore wants us to return CO2 levels back to the 60's, better reinstall all those steel mills back in Gary, so when you stand on the lakeshore in Chicago, all you can see is black, gray, purple, and yellow smoke. WI started open field manure spreading after it sits in a pool after six months, not that was really a set back when we use to have clean fresh air up here. Not only stinks to high heaven, but some rather nasty chemicals in there, like methane and chlorine gas.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
Wait a minute, I am confused by the shell game.

You are calling it "Global warming" again..... has or has not the earth (globe) actually been cooling for the last decade?

Has it? Try the last 11 years, and call it weather patterns as the deniers (channeling BY: aka The idiots) seem to do.

In that case, why don't we go back to calling it Global coolings (As we did in 1975).... if it is raising and falling for decades at a time?

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
A better question would be... what pollutants (and sources) are decreasing at a significant level?

If Gore wants us to return CO2 levels back to the 60's, better reinstall all those steel mills back in Gary, so when you stand on the lakeshore in Chicago, all you can see is black, gray, purple, and yellow smoke. WI started open field manure spreading after it sits in a pool after six months, not that was really a set back when we use to have clean fresh air up here. Not only stinks to high heaven, but some rather nasty chemicals in there, like methane and chlorine gas.

I'd hope that CO2 levels would fall below 350ppm with an innovative industry capable of overcoming such detrimental waste products. Remember back to the last round of EPA mandates requiring companies to report in waste profiles. The companies themselves realized how much product they were wasting, thusly giving themselves an incentive to be more efficient in their entire cradle-to-grave process for product and waste management. Imagine making a profit in making all new kinds of industry more efficient and less polluting. Wow. I guess some folks still sh!t a brick when they think of Al Gore.

You forgot yellowcake uranium in South Chicago too.

Wait a minute, I am confused by the shell game.

You are calling it "Global warming" again..... has or has not the earth (globe) actually been cooling for the last decade?

Has it? Try the last 11 years, and call it weather patterns as the deniers (channeling BY: aka The idiots) seem to do.

In that case, why don't we go back to calling it Global coolings (As we did in 1975).... if it is raising and falling for decades at a time?

Because only morons confuse climate with weather cycles.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Posted

Once again.

photosynthesis3.gif

"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies."

Senator Barack Obama
Senate Floor Speech on Public Debt
March 16, 2006



barack-cowboy-hat.jpg
90f.JPG

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

We do know this, getting the lowest EPA emission gasoline powered internal combustion engine vehicle, starting and running it in a close garage, you will be dead in ten minutes.

Now consider thousands of stalled vehicles, say on the Dan Ryan during rush hour, all idling on a hot windless day. So far really haven't heard of anyone dying from this, but certainly cannot be too great on your health. Especially if you do this everyday.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...