Jump to content

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

The Weekly Standard's Michael Goldfarb had an item yesterday, emphasizing the fact that when FDR and LBJ proposed landmark legislation, they "got Republican votes."

President Obama might not be aware of this but FDR passed Social Security with massive Republican support -- 81 Republicans voted in favor of the measure in the House and only 15 against while 16 Republicans voted in favor in the Senate and just 5 against. Johnson's Medicare package was only marginally more contentious. Just 13 Republicans voted in favor of Medicare in the Senate to 17 against, but in the House, more Republicans (70) voted for Johnson's Medicare plan than against (68).

Maybe President Obama should stop wee-weeing and start trying to get some Republican support for his bill -- as both Johnson and FDR successfully did. Getting a bill like this is not, in fact, always messy. Rather, there is clearly something particular about Obama's approach that has created this mess.

What total nonsense. "Obama's approach" has been to compromise, negotiate, and concede, repeatedly, in the hopes of improving the bill's chances. It's an "approach" that would work if the Republican Party hadn't shifted so far to the right.

Michael Goldfarb might not be aware of this but FDR and LBJ led during a time when moderate and center-left Republicans were still fairly common. Neither Democratic president had trouble finding sensible GOP lawmakers who were anxious to work on progressive policy goals. Obama, however, is stuck trying to find common ground with a right-wing reactionary party.

Harold Meyerson recently explained the history and the larger dynamic very well.

ipartisanship ain't what it used to be, and for one fundamental reason: Republicans ain't what they used to be. It's true that there was considerable Republican congressional support, back in the day, for Social Security and Medicare. But in the '30s, there were progressive Republicans who stood to the left of the Democrats.... Today, no such Republicans exist. [...]

Nationally, the party is dominated by Southern neo-Dixiecrats. In their book "Off Center," political scientists Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson compared congressional Republicans of different eras and concluded that a Republican House member in 2003 with a voting record that placed him at the median of his party was 73 percent more conservative than the median GOP member of the early '70s.

Max Baucus, then, isn't negotiating universal coverage with the party of Everett Dirksen, in which many members supported Medicare. He's negotiating it with the party of Barry Goldwater, who was dead set against Medicare. It's a fool's errand that is creating a plan that's a marvel of ineffectuality and self-negation -- a latter-day Missouri Compromise that reconciles opposites at the cost of good policy.

That Goldfarb doesn't understand this is predictable, but nevertheless sad. Nicholas Beaudrot explained, "t's simply not meaningful to compare the preset circumstances to those faced by Lyndon Johnson or Franklin Roosevelt when it comes to bipartisanship.... Barack Obama faces partisan polarization not seen since Woodrow Wilson was President."

Goldfarb makes it sound as if President Obama deserves the blame for the Republican Party excising moderates from their ranks. Like it or not, it's not the Democrats' fault Republicans have become too conservative.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/

Filed: Timeline
Posted

All good and well, Steve. The fact of the matter is that the Senate is composed of 60 Dems and 40 Repubs and the House has a comfortable Dem majority. When are we going to stop worrying about the GOP that - given the comfortable Democratic majorities in Congress - is irrelevant in accoplishing health care reform? They don't want to be part of the debate, then fine, let them sit in the corner and get on with it. They don't want to shape the reform? Fine, then let them watch as it's being done without them. ** them.

The problem is the Democrats that can't make good use of the majorities they have and that can't seem to translate the mandate they received in November into actual reforms.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...