Jump to content

26 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
maybe I did not say it right but is that not what i said. IF He does not have intent; if you do not discuss your plan with him. It is only he that comes into the USA. I would never suggest something illegal however I will recommend you use the system/law to the best of your ability. There is no white and black its haze gray and you must decide with proper legal help what works best for you. An ####### interpitation of the law is not nessaraly its purpose or intent.

Good Luck

She posted their intent, they plan to marry and for him to stay....that is intent.... so to advise her otherwise is fraudulent.

*January 24 2006 - mailed in I129-F petition

*January 25 2006 - I129-F received at CSC

*January 30 2006 - packet returned.....arggggggggg we forgot one signature!!

*January 31 2006 - sent I129-F back to the CSC, hope we did not forget anything else

*February 1 2006 - I129-F received at CSC again

*February 3 2006 - NOA1

*April 20 2006 - NOA2!!!!!

*April 24 2006 - Touched!

*May 15 2006 - NVC received petition today!

*May 17 2006 - Case left NVC today!!

*May 30 2006 - Received Packet 3 from Vancouver!

*May 30 2006 - Faxed back Packet 3!!

*June 6 2006 - Received packet 4!

*June 20 2006 - Medical in Saskatoon

*June 28 2006 - Interview in Vancouver!!

*June 28 2006 - GOT THE VISA!!!*June 30 2006 - Moving day!

*July 3 2006 - Home at last!!

*July 28 2006 - married!

*September 13 2006 - Mailed AOS/EAD package

*September 25 2006 - Received NOA for AOS/EAD

*October 6 2006 - Biometrics appointments

*October 10 2006 - Touched!

*October 19 2006 - Transferred to CSC!

*October 26 2006 - Received by CSC

*October 27 2006 - Touched

*October 28 2006 - Touched again

*October 31 2006 - Touched again

*November 2 2006 - Touched again

*November 3 2006- and another touch

*November 7 2006- touched

*November 7 2006 - My case approved, still waiting for kids!

*November 8 2006 - Touched my case again

*November 13 2006 - Greencard arrived...yeah I can work!

*November 14 2006 - Touched my case again

*January 2007 - RFE for kids Greencard.

*February 2007 - kids medical and sent in RFE

*February 2007 - Received kids greencards

Posted (edited)

I was told by a Immigration officer that, they actually look on Visajourney. After going through this the right way, i would NEVER put my marrage to be on the line. Do it the right way, start the K1 journey or the K3. YOu will have peace of mind.

Edited by Lizzy

K1

September 15 - 2005: NOA1

October: Waiting

November: Waiting

December: In Security checks

January 2006: Waiting

February: Waiting..Contacted Congress

March 4th: APPROVED

March 17th: NVC posted file to London

March 20th: London Receives file

March 29th: Receive package 3

April 13th: London Receives package

April 19th: Medical - June 13th: INTERVIEW......APPROVED!!!!

June 20th: ARRIVE IN USA

Time taken for whole process 9 Months

~~~~~ * ~~~~~

AOS

October: 13th: Sent off AOS Package

November 3rd: NOA1

November 14th: Snail mail ~ NOA1 ~ Case moved to the CSC for faster processing.

November 14th : CSC has petition for me and my daughter.

December 14th: Biometrics completed.

January 17th: APPROVED AOS!

January 22nd: Green card arrives in the mail:))

Time taken for AOS - 3.5 Months

Finished for 2 years.

dev015pb___.png

Filed: Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)
I was told by a Immigration officer that, they actually look on Visajourney. After going through this the right way, i would NEVER put my marrage to be on the line. Do it the right way, start the K1 journey or the K3. YOu will have peace of mind.

Actually you have a golden opportunity. The consulate in Amsterdam is a consulate that is extremely DCF friendly in allow US Citizens to file a I-130 at the consulate to bring their spouse to the US with an immigrant visa, even if they are not resident in the Netherlands. This way will easily be the fastest way to get your fiancee into the US with the added bonus of being a permanent resident upon entry. All you have to do is fly to the Netherlands, marry him there and then go to Amsterdam and file the I-130 at the consulate there...

Check out the DCF forum here to find out more...

Edited by zyggy

Knowledge itself is power - Sir Francis Bacon

I have gone fishing... you can find me by going here http://**removed due to TOS**

Posted

I was told by a Immigration officer that, they actually look on Visajourney. After going through this the right way, i would NEVER put my marrage to be on the line. Do it the right way, start the K1 journey or the K3. YOu will have peace of mind.

Actually you have a golden opportunity. The consulate in Amsterdam is a consulate that is extremely DCF friendly in allow US Citizens to file a I-130 at the consulate to bring their spouse to the US with an immigrant visa, even if they are not resident in the Netherlands. This way will easily be the fastest way to get your fiancee into the US with the added bonus of being a permanent resident upon entry. All you have to do is fly to the Netherlands, marry him there and then go to Amsterdam and file the I-130 at the consulate there...

Check out the DCF forum here to find out more...

There ya go, hehehe :)

K1

September 15 - 2005: NOA1

October: Waiting

November: Waiting

December: In Security checks

January 2006: Waiting

February: Waiting..Contacted Congress

March 4th: APPROVED

March 17th: NVC posted file to London

March 20th: London Receives file

March 29th: Receive package 3

April 13th: London Receives package

April 19th: Medical - June 13th: INTERVIEW......APPROVED!!!!

June 20th: ARRIVE IN USA

Time taken for whole process 9 Months

~~~~~ * ~~~~~

AOS

October: 13th: Sent off AOS Package

November 3rd: NOA1

November 14th: Snail mail ~ NOA1 ~ Case moved to the CSC for faster processing.

November 14th : CSC has petition for me and my daughter.

December 14th: Biometrics completed.

January 17th: APPROVED AOS!

January 22nd: Green card arrives in the mail:))

Time taken for AOS - 3.5 Months

Finished for 2 years.

dev015pb___.png

Filed: Timeline
Posted

This is beating a dead horse but she posted her intent not his and only one person comes through the immagration line so I will agree to disagree. if he has no intent, he has no intent. His truthful answers when he arrives at immigration are what count.

It would apper a DCF is they way to go anyway.

Please remember that prior to 9-11 the highackers computers were not looked at because of a very very ####### view of what was legal and what was not. Our laws are supose to #1 keep us free #2 Protect us #3 serve us

We are not slaves to the law The Law serves us

Petitioners First Name: Capt. Joe

Beneficiaries First Name: Logic Girl

K-1 Visa

Event Date

Service Center : California Service Center

Consulate : Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

I-129F Sent : 2005-12-13

I-129F NOA1 : 2005-12-21

I-129F RFE(s) : 2006-04-18

RFE Reply(s) : 2006-05-05

I-129F NOA2 : 2006-05-11

NVC Received :

NVC Left : 2006-05-26

Consulate Received : 2006-05-31

Packet 3 mailed 2006-06-19

Packet 3 Received : 2006-07-10

Packet 3 Sent : 2006-07-12

Packet 4 Received : 2006-09-23

Interview Date : 2006-10-05 passed!!!!

Visa Received : 2006-10-10

US Entry : 2006-10-13

Marriage : 2006-10-16

Comments : sending out AOS papers 11-27-06

Processing

Estimates/Stats : Your I-129f was approved in 149 days.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
This is beating a dead horse but she posted her intent not his and only one person comes through the immagration line so I will agree to disagree. if he has no intent, he has no intent. His truthful answers when he arrives at immigration are what count.

It would apper a DCF is they way to go anyway.

Please remember that prior to 9-11 the highackers computers were not looked at because of a very very ####### view of what was legal and what was not. Our laws are supose to #1 keep us free #2 Protect us #3 serve us

We are not slaves to the law The Law serves us

I would suggest you get a little more familiar with the laws before offering advice.

*January 24 2006 - mailed in I129-F petition

*January 25 2006 - I129-F received at CSC

*January 30 2006 - packet returned.....arggggggggg we forgot one signature!!

*January 31 2006 - sent I129-F back to the CSC, hope we did not forget anything else

*February 1 2006 - I129-F received at CSC again

*February 3 2006 - NOA1

*April 20 2006 - NOA2!!!!!

*April 24 2006 - Touched!

*May 15 2006 - NVC received petition today!

*May 17 2006 - Case left NVC today!!

*May 30 2006 - Received Packet 3 from Vancouver!

*May 30 2006 - Faxed back Packet 3!!

*June 6 2006 - Received packet 4!

*June 20 2006 - Medical in Saskatoon

*June 28 2006 - Interview in Vancouver!!

*June 28 2006 - GOT THE VISA!!!*June 30 2006 - Moving day!

*July 3 2006 - Home at last!!

*July 28 2006 - married!

*September 13 2006 - Mailed AOS/EAD package

*September 25 2006 - Received NOA for AOS/EAD

*October 6 2006 - Biometrics appointments

*October 10 2006 - Touched!

*October 19 2006 - Transferred to CSC!

*October 26 2006 - Received by CSC

*October 27 2006 - Touched

*October 28 2006 - Touched again

*October 31 2006 - Touched again

*November 2 2006 - Touched again

*November 3 2006- and another touch

*November 7 2006- touched

*November 7 2006 - My case approved, still waiting for kids!

*November 8 2006 - Touched my case again

*November 13 2006 - Greencard arrived...yeah I can work!

*November 14 2006 - Touched my case again

*January 2007 - RFE for kids Greencard.

*February 2007 - kids medical and sent in RFE

*February 2007 - Received kids greencards

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
This is beating a dead horse but she posted her intent not his and only one person comes through the immagration line so I will agree to disagree. if he has no intent, he has no intent. His truthful answers when he arrives at immigration are what count.

It would apper a DCF is they way to go anyway.

Please remember that prior to 9-11 the highackers computers were not looked at because of a very very ####### view of what was legal and what was not. Our laws are supose to #1 keep us free #2 Protect us #3 serve us

We are not slaves to the law The Law serves us

Do you sincerely believe that this plan would exist in her head only? If so, I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you! :lol:

Dutchies who do not at least consider DCF are missing the boat, IMO.

It *is* faster to marry in the US however. If they can afford it, come here and marry and return home for the IV process. Last report I read it's running about 2 months petition-->visa.

Now That You Are A Permanent Resident

How Do I Remove The Conditions On Permanent Residence Based On Marriage?

Welcome to the United States: A Guide For New Immigrants

Yes, even this last one.. stuff in there that not even your USC knows.....

Here are more links that I love:

Arriving in America, The POE Drill

Dual Citizenship FAQ

Other Fora I Post To:

alt.visa.us.marriage-based http://britishexpats.com/ and www.***removed***.com

censored link = *family based immigration* website

Inertia. Is that the Greek god of 'can't be bothered'?

Met, married, immigrated, naturalized.

I-130 filed Aug02

USC Jul06

No Deje Piedras Sobre El Pavimento!

Posted

aussiewench is correct, as I understand it.

You could get married on a visit without being fraudulent, because the problem is with the intent to *immigrate* when he entered, not marriage per se. If you were, say, to get married, and then he left and you applied for a K-3, you'd be technically fine.

But, here's the thing. As I understand your question, you're wondering if he can just come here and get married and stay with you and your child without running foul of the law. And that's a no -- it would be entering with intent to immigrate.

And here's the second thing. I suspect most of the 'intent' thing is for a situation like this: I am in school, I meet a student here on a student visa, we date through college and marry, and then we go through the green card process. When he entered on the visa *he hadn't even met me yet*, so there can't be fraud. (A friend just did this with her Romanian husband.)

Coming over to a fiancée where you have a child isn't going to look good. "We've been together three years and we have a kid and we're engaged and it just so happened we spontaneously got married"? Much harder sell, and not worth the risk.

AOS

-

Filed: 8/1/07

NOA1:9/7/07

Biometrics: 9/28/07

EAD/AP: 10/17/07

EAD card ordered again (who knows, maybe we got the two-fer deal): 10/23/-7

Transferred to CSC: 10/26/07

Approved: 11/21/07

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

I do not see how it is illegal if you do not talk about it with him and he just comes here to visit. he is not lieing or missinforming anyone in the USG; his intention is to come to visit on the VWP. Once he is here you convince him to stay and marry asap and it seems legal. Then just do a aos here. The law says he must be truthful so if his intention is not to marry just visit and you use your womenly arts to change his mind after the fact how is that illegal???? and you do not have to be apart. But I guess I would run this by at laest 1 lawyer if not 2 and see what they think.

Good Luck,

Encouraging someone to do something illegal is against the TOS of VJ

To all those using the statement that it is illegal to enter the US using the VWP to marry, are incorrect. It is not illegal to marry in the US whilst on the VWP or on a visitors visa. What is illegal is intent to immigrate when one entered the US. However if one is granted entry (not lied) and is otherwise eligible, one can apply to adjust status after one gets married.

It IS illegal to enter on the VWP and get married IF you had the INTENT to do such. The OP asked the question with the INTENT to marry while the fiance is here on the VWP.....

Stacey (USA) & Carl (ENGLAND)

06-2005.... met in an online game room & knew instantly we

............... were meant to be together.. not a day has gone by that

............... we haven't spoken with one another

09-2005.... went on holiday with Carl in England

................ (he proposed and I accepted!!!)

12-2005.... Carl came to the US on holiday

03-2006.... went on holiday once again in England

03-23-2006.... mailed I-129F

03-27-2006.... NOA1 - received at nsc

06-01-2006.... e-mail notice of transfer to csc

06-02-2006.... touched

06-03-2006.... touched

06-05-2006.... paper notice of transfer to csc received in mail

06-10-2006.... 2nd paper notice of transfer to csc received in mail

06-14-2006.... touched

06-15-2006.... touched

06-16-2006.... touched

06-17-2006.... touched

07-03-2006.... touched (email notice of RFE)

07-03-2006.... RFE (imbra) received in mail

07-04-2006.... touched (on a holiday even!)

07-05-2006.... RFE sent via express mail to CSC

07-05-2006.... touched

07-06-2006.... RFE received at CSC

08-07-2006.... NOA2

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

I do not see how it is illegal if you do not talk about it with him and he just comes here to visit. he is not lieing or missinforming anyone in the USG; his intention is to come to visit on the VWP. Once he is here you convince him to stay and marry asap and it seems legal. Then just do a aos here. The law says he must be truthful so if his intention is not to marry just visit and you use your womenly arts to change his mind after the fact how is that illegal???? and you do not have to be apart. But I guess I would run this by at laest 1 lawyer if not 2 and see what they think.

Good Luck,

Encouraging someone to do something illegal is against the TOS of VJ

To all those using the statement that it is illegal to enter the US using the VWP to marry, are incorrect. It is not illegal to marry in the US whilst on the VWP or on a visitors visa. What is illegal is intent to immigrate when one entered the US. However if one is granted entry (not lied) and is otherwise eligible, one can apply to adjust status after one gets married.

It IS illegal to enter on the VWP and get married IF you had the INTENT to do such. The OP asked the question with the INTENT to marry while the fiance is here on the VWP.....

No, you are wrong.

You are confusing which intent is the problem. Immigrating on a non-immigrant option is the problem.

People can and do come to the US every day to get married. Then they leave. Totally legal.

Now That You Are A Permanent Resident

How Do I Remove The Conditions On Permanent Residence Based On Marriage?

Welcome to the United States: A Guide For New Immigrants

Yes, even this last one.. stuff in there that not even your USC knows.....

Here are more links that I love:

Arriving in America, The POE Drill

Dual Citizenship FAQ

Other Fora I Post To:

alt.visa.us.marriage-based http://britishexpats.com/ and www.***removed***.com

censored link = *family based immigration* website

Inertia. Is that the Greek god of 'can't be bothered'?

Met, married, immigrated, naturalized.

I-130 filed Aug02

USC Jul06

No Deje Piedras Sobre El Pavimento!

Posted

I do not see how it is illegal if you do not talk about it with him and he just comes here to visit. he is not lieing or missinforming anyone in the USG; his intention is to come to visit on the VWP. Once he is here you convince him to stay and marry asap and it seems legal. Then just do a aos here. The law says he must be truthful so if his intention is not to marry just visit and you use your womenly arts to change his mind after the fact how is that illegal???? and you do not have to be apart. But I guess I would run this by at laest 1 lawyer if not 2 and see what they think.

Good Luck,

Encouraging someone to do something illegal is against the TOS of VJ

To all those using the statement that it is illegal to enter the US using the VWP to marry, are incorrect. It is not illegal to marry in the US whilst on the VWP or on a visitors visa. What is illegal is intent to immigrate when one entered the US. However if one is granted entry (not lied) and is otherwise eligible, one can apply to adjust status after one gets married.

It IS illegal to enter on the VWP and get married IF you had the INTENT to do such. The OP asked the question with the INTENT to marry while the fiance is here on the VWP.....

I am quite aware of what the OP asked ;) and as meauxna has said already.....this is NOT illegal. Many do and have done this, including myself. The intent to immigrate is the issue.

You can find me on FBI

An overview of Security Name Checks And Administrative Review at Service Center, NVC & Consulate levels.

Detailed Review USCIS Alien Security Checks

fb2fc244.gif72c97806.gif4d488a91.gif

11324375801ij.gif

View Timeline HERE

I am but a wench not a lawyer. My advice and opinion is just that. I read, I research, I learn.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...