Jump to content
w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r

Government's Next Lesson: Small Is Beautiful


2 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

Antitrust law needs to be updated to include "too big to fail" as a criterion for dismemberment. The alternative is pervasive regulation and/or government ownership of institutions, which control huge swathes of the economy.

Financial regulation is, as we've seen, a chimera: whether or not you blame Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) for being a partial cause of the current collapse, there's no question that they WERE regulated – as is Citibank © – and that they collapsed. All public companies in the U.S. are regulated to some extent by the SEC and have draconian external audit requirements. Neither the regulation nor the auditing warned stockholders of the potential collapse of AIG (AIG), Lehman Brothers (LEHMQ.PK), and now GM (GM). Why? It's not that all the auditors and regulators are corrupt or even incompetent, though some are surely both. The problem is black swans, as Nassim Taleb elegantly pointed out in his book of the same name: You are in more danger from the unknowable than the knowable risk; the past is an extremely misleading guide to the future. Put less elegantly, s h i t happens and all the regulation in the world can't prevent or predict it. The appearance of regulation is dangerous because it gives us a false sense of confidence – we even start believing financial statements.

Government ownership of finance and manufacturing is even worse. Witness the late not-lamented Soviet empire, China, or India before they shook off their socialist ways. You do need some regulation – especially safety, environmental, and fraud regulation to govern the terms of competition; government should perform that function in an adversarial role to the private sector. Government is at its worst in regulating itself. Chernobyl was a government reactor.

A century ago the continued success of capitalism required harnessing the "trusts" – especially Standard Oil, businesses that got so large that they could throttle all competition and swallow adjacent parts of the value chain. Railroads had to pay Standard Oil a fee for each barrel of competitors' oil they dared to ship. Antitrust law largely accomplished what it set out to do.

Today's problem – and tomorrow's if we don't address it – is businesses that are "too big to fail." They are certainly unfair competition to their smaller competitors who can't count on bailouts. They can make up for their size-induced lethargy and opulent lifestyles (for executives) by taking risks secure in the knowledge that it's heads we win and tails you lose. When the mortgage securitization risks paid off, AIG and Citi could reap the rewards, and when they failed, we paid.

It was hard to write and establish the law, which defined dominant market position and has been used (and misused) in the last century of antitrust enforcement. It'll be hard to write the law, which defines "too big to fail," and it'll be subject to endless court interpretation. It shouldn't be a crime to create an entity that is too big; however, the government should have the power to require the dismembering of such an institution just as it can dismember a company whose market position is too strong to allow the market to function.

If no company is too big to fail, then market discipline will be a much more potent regulator than it is today.


Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil

oh the irony of aj posting a topic with "Small Is Beautiful" in the title :lol:

* ~ * Charles * ~ *

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.



Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
  • Create New...