Jump to content

24 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Are you saying that rape cases are or should be low priority cases? That seems pretty absurd to me.

As for my toilet - you can make whatever insinuation you like regarding it and what my priorities in the cleaning department may or may not be.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Filed: Country: Belarus
Timeline
Posted
What would it cost to manage the data base and cross reference with newly collected samples? Facts please - meanwhile 7 years worth of rape case DNA in LA waits for processing...

And meanwhile your toilet hasn't been cleaned for 7 years either. Ever heard of priorities? There is a huge difference between can do and won't do.

If putting bad actors in jail is too much of a bother, maybe that's why I keep a 12 gauge shotgun loaded with 0-0 buckshot under my bed. Somebody got to pick up the slack. Gummit ain't doin' it. ;)

I imagine the chances of someone breaking into your house and giving you the time to grab your gun (both "long shots" individually, never mind together, pun intended) are similar to that of a child or family member finding the gun and doing something with it. No guns will ever be in my house unless I'm dumb enough to live in a place where I don't feel safe.

On the subject, what is wrong with the current database we have now that necessitates wasting more money? If you don't trust the "gummit" with universal health care, how come you'd trust them with people's DNA?

Is this the expert opinion of someone that doesn't even own a gun or refuses to keep one in his house? OK. I'm convinced.

Crime victims are dumb for living in their own neighborhood? Gee, isn't that a bit elitist? I mean, not everyone is well heeled enough to live in a gated community with 24 hour private guards to protect them. I'll gladly take my shotgun under the bed over a telephone and a 20+ minute response from the cops. A lot can happen in 20 minutes. Glad to know you are privileged enough to totally crime free environment. You probably never ever venture outside your walled and guarded community either. No wonder your outlook at life is so provincial. ;)

Anyway...health care and law enforcement are two very different animals. There is no comparison what-so-ever. I can buy private healthcare on the open market. Law enforcement, the justice system, and the legislative process of passing criminal statutes is totally a function of the government for better or worst. However, I am legally able to protect myself in my own home when government is unable or too incompetent to do it for me. I strive to be independent and not have to depend on gummit or anyone else for my wellbeing when possible. Why does that piss off liberals such as yourself?

Government is a necessary evil, but the less of it the better. The legal system is one function better left to government. I already have private healthcare. If government can do it cheaper and better...groovy. If not, take a hike. Why would I want to pay more for less coverage? I'm not convinced government is better. 'Scuse me for not taking your word for it.

"Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave."

"...for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process."

US Congresswoman Barbara Jordan (D-TX)

Testimony to the House Immigration Subcommittee, February 24, 1995

Filed: Country: Belarus
Timeline
Posted
Are you saying that rape cases are or should be low priority cases? That seems pretty absurd to me.

As for my toilet - you can make whatever insinuation you like regarding it and what my priorities in the cleaning department may or may not be.

Read what I wrote. I said if LA has a 7 year backlog then they have their priorities misplaced. Ditto for your toilet if you never clean it. Your priorities are misplaced.

BTW...I could care less about the condition of your toilet. ;)

"Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave."

"...for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process."

US Congresswoman Barbara Jordan (D-TX)

Testimony to the House Immigration Subcommittee, February 24, 1995

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

Next this f-ing country is gonna want my stool sample and vaginal swap - just for the sheer joy of living here.

And I'll tell you where the $37.50 is going to come from - my pocketbook when I write my next cheque to the DHS to finish my immigration paperwork. F*ckers.

Even criminals have a right to deny giving a DNA sample - the cops have to play cat and mouse trying to get a sample. Why TF should legal immigrants be denied that opportunity of only disposing cigarette butts and soda cans in an incinerator?!

Next it will be for anyone requesting a gun permit or filling their gas tank.

Country:
Timeline
Posted (edited)
20+ minute response from the cops.

Maybe if you live out in the country.

Here, it's about 2-4 minutes. I live in the city. Around here, there are actually cops. And people. Imagine that.

Glad to know you are privileged enough to totally crime free environment. You probably never ever venture outside your walled and guarded community either. No wonder your outlook at life is so provincial. ;)

I'm also a bit realistic. I could have went off the deep end and tried to make my argument look good citing 30 seconds. Could have also cited that cops might be delayed in getting through the gates in a gated community.

Anyway...health care and law enforcement are two very different animals. There is no comparison what-so-ever. I can buy private healthcare on the open market. Law enforcement, the justice system, and the legislative process of passing criminal statutes is totally a function of the government for better or worst.

You could also pay for armed security. Why bother with cops?

However, I am legally able to protect myself in my own home when government is unable or too incompetent to do it for me. I strive to be independent and not have to depend on gummit or anyone else for my wellbeing when possible. Why does that piss off liberals such as yourself?

This "gummit" service is dependent upon the taxpayer. So I wouldn't feel bad depending on things, just as one would depend on a private doctor, private dentist, private optometrist, and so on. The only negative perception of that is this is an essential service, like policing, you just nicely cherrypick it likely because of what conservatives told you. Having no universal is no more realistic than having private armed security guards rather than police.

Government is a necessary evil, but the less of it the better. The legal system is one function better left to government. I already have private healthcare. If government can do it cheaper and better...groovy. If not, take a hike. Why would I want to pay more for less coverage? I'm not convinced government is better. 'Scuse me for not taking your word for it.

Less of government intrusion is better. Less of government is debatable depending upon the function. For instance, Republicans tout less government.. sure, except in federal police and DOD/DOJ spending which they use to spy on Americans.

Government CAN do it cheaper and better. It is their job to balance the budget. It is the voters job to ensure that those IN the government do their job. In insurance companies, they pick and choose what to cover you for, pick and choose whether to insure you at all, and increase your premiums because of certain medical liabilities. People's health need not be at the behest of profit-maximization. Hell, doctors around here have even been pushing for universal, along with the people. So the people will, sooner the better, get what they need. It makes no financial sense either to get private insurance while more people go uninsured. More uninsured means more of your taxes to pay their bills. It also means you're around more sick people. It also means your likelihood of getting ill goes up as well, which means it's more costly in the end.

Doesn't take a genius to figure these things out. Only someone absent from the catch-22 logic of big government in spying and killing, little government providing essential services.

Edited by SRVT
Posted (edited)
Less of government intrusion is better. Less of government is debatable depending upon the function. For instance, Republicans tout less government.. sure, except in federal police and DOD/DOJ spending which they use to spy on Americans.

Spy on who? Your pathetic little life..

No offense but you are insignificant.

Maybe you can sign up to law enforcement since you know everything.

Edited by Aficionado

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Country:
Timeline
Posted
Less of government intrusion is better. Less of government is debatable depending upon the function. For instance, Republicans tout less government.. sure, except in federal police and DOD/DOJ spending which they use to spy on Americans.

Spy on who? Your pathetic little life..

No offense but you are insignificant.

Maybe you can sign up to law enforcement since you know everything.

Translation: my argument sux and I can't actually debate the issue.

Thanks for failing.

Posted
Translation: my argument sux and I can't actually debate the issue.

Thanks for failing.

Epic fail / failing what the hell is that. Are you 16 or something? Because that is the only people I heard using that #######.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
Interestinly or not, there are 7 years worth of DNA pertaining to rape cases untested in the City of LA. What does this tell us?

That science education in this country and investment in scientific careers are shoddy.

DNA is much more accurate than fingerprints but safeguards need to be in place to avoid false positive identifications. We leave dead cells with enough falsely incriminating DNA at places that could become posterior crime scenes.

AS for the topic in itself its not a bad idea. Pending proper analysis procedure and cost effectiveness. I haven't done a genotype in a bit but the basic protocol takes between 24 and 48 hours unless you're using a DNA cycler. That's an awful long time if you're holding someone that's innocent.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...