Jump to content
metta

Canadian journalist compares Palin to porn actress and white trash

58 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)
OK its vitriolic to say the least. But why does anyone care what a columnist in Canada writes about political candidates in the US?

Well, I care because all the lefties of the world including guys like Andrew Sullivan, Gordon Brown, even Nigerian rebel group and Hamas have been declaring their endorsements for Barry and as if they consider themselves to be part of the voting constituencies of these United States of America. :devil:

No wonder Barack in his unguarded moments count

instead of 50 :yes:

57 with one to go (not counting AL & HI) - so 60! :lol:

Edited by illumine
  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
OK its vitriolic to say the least. But why does anyone care what a columnist in Canada writes about political candidates in the US?

Well, I care because all the lefties of the world including guys like Andrew Sullivan, Gordon Brown, even Nigerian rebel group and Hamas have been declaring their endorsements for Barry and as if they consider themselves to be part of the voting constituencies of these United States of America. :devil:

No wonder Barack in his unguarded moments count

instead of 50 :yes:

But... they aren't...

So again... what's the problem?

Country:
Timeline
Posted
OK its vitriolic to say the least. But why does anyone care what a columnist in Canada writes about political candidates in the US?

Well, I care because all the lefties of the world including guys like Andrew Sullivan, Gordon Brown, even Nigerian rebel group and Hamas have been declaring their endorsements for Barry and as if they consider themselves to be part of the voting constituencies of these United States of America. :devil:

No wonder Barack in his unguarded moments count

instead of 50 :yes:

I'm pretty sure Osama in Laden endorses John McCain and Sarah Palin because, like Bush, they have all the intention in the world of using his name to kill more American soldiers abroad in some war against another country having nothing to do with "terrorism" or even 9/11 while Osama has some nice margaritas on some beach in a Middle Eastern country the U.S. wouldn't dare attack. That's likely why they call him "McSame". Same old terrorism ####### about to work on the same idiots.

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)
OK its vitriolic to say the least. But why does anyone care what a columnist in Canada writes about political candidates in the US?

Well, I care because all the lefties of the world including guys like Andrew Sullivan, Gordon Brown, even Nigerian rebel group and Hamas have been declaring their endorsements for Barry and as if they consider themselves to be part of the voting constituencies of these United States of America. :devil:

No wonder Barack in his unguarded moments count

instead of 50 :yes:

I'm pretty sure Osama in Laden endorses John McCain and Sarah Palin because, like Bush, they have all the intention in the world of using his name to kill more American soldiers abroad in some war against another country having nothing to do with "terrorism" or even 9/11 while Osama has some nice margaritas on some beach in a Middle Eastern country the U.S. wouldn't dare attack. That's likely why they call him "McSame". Same old terrorism ####### about to work on the same idiots.

At least they know how many states they have to campaign in!

Edited by illumine
Country:
Timeline
Posted
OK its vitriolic to say the least. But why does anyone care what a columnist in Canada writes about political candidates in the US?

Well, I care because all the lefties of the world including guys like Andrew Sullivan, Gordon Brown, even Nigerian rebel group and Hamas have been declaring their endorsements for Barry and as if they consider themselves to be part of the voting constituencies of these United States of America. :devil:

No wonder Barack in his unguarded moments count

instead of 50 :yes:

I'm pretty sure Osama in Laden endorses John McCain and Sarah Palin because, like Bush, they have all the intention in the world of using his name to kill more American soldiers abroad in some war against another country having nothing to do with "terrorism" or even 9/11 while Osama has some nice margaritas on some beach in a Middle Eastern country the U.S. wouldn't dare attack. That's likely why they call him "McSame". Same old terrorism ####### about to work on the same idiots.

At least they know how many states they have to campaign in!

I wouldn't count on McAlzheimer's to remember it for long.

Posted (edited)
I'm pretty sure Osama in Laden endorses John McCain and Sarah Palin because, like Bush, they have all the intention in the world of using his name to kill more American soldiers abroad in some war against another country having nothing to do with "terrorism" or even 9/11 while Osama has some nice margaritas on some beach in a Middle Eastern country the U.S. wouldn't dare attack. That's likely why they call him "McSame". Same old terrorism ####### about to work on the same idiots.

Obviously Sept/11 was planned during the months GWB was in office.

Though, you do seem to be the type who would think 9/11 was an inside job..

Edited by Aficionado

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Country:
Timeline
Posted
I'm pretty sure Osama in Laden endorses John McCain and Sarah Palin because, like Bush, they have all the intention in the world of using his name to kill more American soldiers abroad in some war against another country having nothing to do with "terrorism" or even 9/11 while Osama has some nice margaritas on some beach in a Middle Eastern country the U.S. wouldn't dare attack. That's likely why they call him "McSame". Same old terrorism ####### about to work on the same idiots.

Obviously Sept/11 was planned during the months GWB was in office.

Though, you do seem to be the type who would think 9/11 was an inside job..

And you're clearly running scared cause everyone's attacking the poor white guy.

There, there, we already feel sorry for you. Is there a need to troll your way to making us feel even more empathetic?

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
I think anybody who says they HATE or LOVE a political candidate is - well - really wasting perfectly good emotions on a perfectly insignificant issue.

Now THERE'S a dose of reality if I ever saw one :):thumbs:

AOS:

2007-02-22: Sent AOS /EAD

2007-03-06 : NOA1 AOS /EAD

2007-03-28: Transferred to CSC

2007-05-17: EAD Card Production Ordered

2007-05-21: I485 Approved

2007-05-24: EAD Card Received

2007-06-01: Green Card Received!!

Removal of Conditions:

2009-02-27: Sent I-751

2009-03-07: NOA I-751

2009-03-31: Biometrics Appt. Hartford

2009-07-21: Touched (first time since biometrics) Perhaps address change?

2009-07-28: Approved at VSC

2009-08-25: Received card in the mail

Naturalization

2012-08-20: Submitted N-400

2013-01-18: Became Citizen

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Panama
Timeline
Posted
Coming from a columnist at publicly funded Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), this is an unbelievable display of venomous and vulgar journalism...

-

A Mighty Wind blows through Republican convention

Heather Mallick

I assume John McCain chose Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential partner in a fit of pique because the Republican money men refused to let him have the stuffed male shirt he really wanted. She added nothing to the ticket that the Republicans didn't already have sewn up, the white trash vote, the demographic that sullies America's name inside and outside its borders yet has such a curious appeal for the right.

So why do it?

It's possible that Republican men, sexual inadequates that they are, really believe that women will vote for a woman just because she's a woman. They're unfamiliar with our true natures. Do they think vaginas call out to each other in the jungle night? I mean, I know men have their secret meetings at which they pledge to do manly things, like being irresponsible with their semen and postponing household repairs with glue and used matches. Guys will be guys, obviously.

But do they not know that women have been trained to resent other women and that they only learn to suppress this by constantly berating themselves and reading columns like this one? I'm a feminist who understands that women can nurse terrible and delicate woman hatred.

Palin was not a sure choice, not even for the stolidly Republican ladies branch of Citizens for a Tackier America. No, she isn't even female really. She's a type, and she comes in male form too.

John Doyle, the cleverest critic in Canada, comes right out and calls Palin an Alaska hillbilly. Damn his eyes, I wish I'd had the wit to come up with it first. It's safer than "white trash" but I'll pluck safety out of the nettle danger. Or something.

Doyle's job includes watching a lot of reality television and he's well-versed in the backstory. White trash — not trailer trash, that's something different — is rural, loud, proudly unlettered (like Bush himself), suspicious of the urban, frankly disbelieving of the foreign, and a fan of the American cliché of authenticity. The semiotics are pure Palin: a sturdy body, clothes that are clinging yet boxy and a voice that could peel the plastic seal off your new microwave.

'Turn your guns on Levi, ma'am'

Palin has a toned-down version of the porn actress look favoured by this decade's woman, the overtreated hair, puffy lips and permanently alarmed expression. Bristol has what is known in Britain as the look of the teen mum, the "pramface." Husband Todd looks like a roughneck; Track, heading off to Iraq, appears terrified. They claim to be family obsessed while being studiously terrible at parenting. What normal father would want Levi "I'm a fuckin' redneck" Johnson prodding his daughter?

I know that I have an attachment to children that verges on the irrational, but why don't the Palins? I'm not the one preaching homespun values but I'd destroy that ratboy before I'd let him get within scenting range of my daughter again, and so would you. Palin's e-mails about the brother-in-law she tried to get fired as a state trooper are fizzing with rage and revenge. Turn your guns on Levi, ma'am.

Palin has it all, along with being vicious and profoundly dishonest. Just hours after her first convention speech, the Associated Press did a good fast listing of her untruths and I won't dwell on them.

I did promise to watch the entire convention so you wouldn't have to, but I discovered a neat trick. I switched between the convention and the 2003 folk music mockumentary A Mighty Wind on Bravo.

They were indistinguishable. Click on a nervous wreck with deeply strange hair doing a monologue on society today and where it all went wrong. Are you watching Christian belter Aaron Tippin singing Where the Stars and Stripes and Eagle Fly in the Xcel Centre in St. Paul or the actors from Spinal Tap remixing the 1966 version of Potato's in the Paddy Wagon?

Who delivered this line: "To do then now would be retro. To do then then was very now-tro, if you will." Was it Rev. James Dobson of Focus on the Family talking about Bristol Palin's shotgun wedding or was it a flashback to the Kingston Trio?

The conventioneers are nothing like the rich men who run the party, and that's the mystery of the hick vote. They'd be much better served by the Democrats. I know Thomas Frank answered this in What's the Matter with Kansas?; I know that red states vote Republican on social issues to give themselves the only self-esteem available to their broken, economically abused existence.

Lie works for Palin

But surely they know Barack Obama is not planning to finish off the ordinary hillbilly when he adjusts tax rates. He's going to raise taxes on the top 2% of Americans and that doesn't include anyone at the convention beyond the Bushes and McCains and random party management. So why cheer Palin when she claims otherwise?

Is it racism? I'm told that it is, although I find racism so appalling that I have difficulty identifying it. It is more likely the dearly held Republican notion that any American can become violently rich, as rich as those hedge funders in Greenwich, Conn., who buy $40-million mansions unseen and have their topiary shaped in the form of musical notes.

When Palin and Rudy Giuliani sneered at Obama's years of "community organizing" — they said it like "rectal fissure" — the audience ewww-ed with them. Republicans dream of a personal future that involves only household staff, not equals who need to be persuaded to vote.

So I'm trying to imagine the pain of realizing, as they all must at some point, that it is not going to happen for them. It's the green light at the end of the dock. It's the ship that never comes in, gals, as Palin would put it. But she won't because the lie works for her. It helps her scramble, without compassion, above all those other tense no-hoper ladies in the audience.

American politics isn't short of smart women. Susan Eisenhower, Ike's granddaughter, who just endorsed Obama, made an extraordinary speech at the Democratic convention (and a terrific casual appearance on The Colbert Report as Palin was speaking). The Republican party has already consumed nearly all of its moderate "seed corn," she said aptly. Time to start again.

Eisenhower, a scholar and journalist, has a point. Or am I only saying that because she's part of the thoughtful demographic that I'm trying to reach here? Think, Heather, think like a Republican! The Skeptics, shall I call them, are my base, and I'll pander to them as ardently as the Republican patriarchs tease their white female marginals.

This Week

Mad Men is scaring me (AMC on Sunday nights). What has Matthew Weiner, a writer from The Sopranos, created, a period soap opera about reality and façade or a horror series on a localized war between men and women? Was Episode 6 of Season 2 a costume drama about the Madonna/####### complex or the operatic rendition of one simple thing, human cruelty?

Or maybe I'm seeing too much into it and it's just a sexed-up version of the Republican convention.

:wow: Now that wasn't necessary !

Aren't we building a fence up there? If not then it's time.......We need to keep our liberals from fleeing this country and moving to Canada....They'll find solace there.....as well as camraderie :lol:

I hate cold weather so I'll just go back to Panama.

May 7,2007-USCIS received I-129f
July 24,2007-NOA1 was received
April 21,2008-K-1 visa denied.
June 3,2008-waiver filed at US Consalate in Panama
The interview went well,they told him it will take another 6 months for them to adjudicate the waiver
March 3,2009-US Consulate claims they have no record of our December visit,nor Manuel's interview
March 27,2009-Manuel returned to the consulate for another interrogation(because they forgot about December's interview),and they were really rude !
April 3,2009-US Counsalate asks for more court documents that no longer exist !
June 1,2009-Manuel and I go back to the US consalate AGAIN to give them a letter from the court in Colon along with documents I already gave them last year.I was surprised to see they had two thick files for his case !


June 15,2010-They called Manuel in to take his fingerprints again,still no decision on his case!
June 22,2010-WAIVER APPROVED at 5:00pm
July 19,2010-VISA IN MANUELITO'S HAND at 3:15pm!
July 25,2010-Manuelito arrives at 9:35pm at Logan Intn'l Airport,Boston,MA
August 5,2010-FINALLY MARRIED!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 23,2010-Filed for AOS at the International Institute of RI $1400!
December 23,2010-Work authorization received.
January 12,2011-RFE

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...