Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
one...two...tree

Taking a Step Back Into 2004

12 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

John Kerry - a Vietnam war hero was running against GW Bush, an Air National Guardsman that never saw a day of combat. Logic would have it the Republicans would be praising Kerry's military service and his bravery. Did they do that? Nope. Instead, they made a Vietnam war hero into a laughing stock.

DBunker_medals.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
John Kerry - a Vietnam war hero was running against GW Bush, an Air National Guardsman that never saw a day of combat. Logic would have it the Republicans would be praising Kerry's military service and his bravery. Did they do that? Nope. Instead, they made a Vietnam war hero into a laughing stock.

DBunker_medals.jpg

He did that to himself. All we did was point it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
John Kerry - a Vietnam war hero was running against GW Bush, an Air National Guardsman that never saw a day of combat. Logic would have it the Republicans would be praising Kerry's military service and his bravery. Did they do that? Nope. Instead, they made a Vietnam war hero into a laughing stock.

DBunker_medals.jpg

He did that to himself. All we did was point it out.

:rolleyes:


May 7,2007-USCIS received I-129f
July 24,2007-NOA1 was received
April 21,2008-K-1 visa denied.
June 3,2008-waiver filed at US Consalate in Panama
The interview went well,they told him it will take another 6 months for them to adjudicate the waiver
March 3,2009-US Consulate claims they have no record of our December visit,nor Manuel's interview
March 27,2009-Manuel returned to the consulate for another interrogation(because they forgot about December's interview),and they were really rude !
April 3,2009-US Counsalate asks for more court documents that no longer exist !
June 1,2009-Manuel and I go back to the US consalate AGAIN to give them a letter from the court in Colon along with documents I already gave them last year.I was surprised to see they had two thick files for his case !


June 15,2010-They called Manuel in to take his fingerprints again,still no decision on his case!
June 22,2010-WAIVER APPROVED at 5:00pm
July 19,2010-VISA IN MANUELITO'S HAND at 3:15pm!
July 25,2010-Manuelito arrives at 9:35pm at Logan Intn'l Airport,Boston,MA
August 5,2010-FINALLY MARRIED!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 23,2010-Filed for AOS at the International Institute of RI $1400!
December 23,2010-Work authorization received.
January 12,2011-RFE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the epitome of politics of late, but moreover, the Karl Rove tactics where all you do is smear your opponent and make ####### up, then you don't have to actually address and debate the real issues when all you have is junk PR ####### going back and forth. Makes it very easy for politicians.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
John Kerry - a Vietnam war hero was running against GW Bush, an Air National Guardsman that never saw a day of combat. Logic would have it the Republicans would be praising Kerry's military service and his bravery. Did they do that? Nope. Instead, they made a Vietnam war hero into a laughing stock.

Kerry didn't take much pride in his military record and was primarily known for his anti-war activities especially the phony Winter soldier hearings. Only when he ran in 2004 did he focus on his hero status and that fact alone. He never had a clear Iraq policy and spent all of his time arguing about how his service record trumped Bush's. Clinton bested Bush senior and Dole both of whom did more than Clinton ever did in dodging the draft but Clinton won both times so military service only goes so far with the public.

So far I haven't really heard McCain slamming Obama for his non-service in the military.


David & Lalai

th_ourweddingscrapbook-1.jpg

aneska1-3-1-1.gif

Greencard Received Date: July 3, 2009

Lifting of Conditions : March 18, 2011

I-751 Application Sent: April 23, 2011

Biometrics: June 9, 2011

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

995150_4aca7184e2.jpg

We have seen this shell game before. John Kerry stepping out for a staged photo-op, brandishing a gun for political gain. While this time, Kerry's foray with a gun did not result in a few disputed medals; he still used a prop to further his political future. Back in 'Nam, he staged mock battles and carried an 8mm camera with him to snap images. These movies were to show people (voters) back home that he was some sort of hero. While most men were worried about not coming back while grasping their M-16, Kerry was thinking about how to use the system to get out early, get all the right medals, and a develop a few good stories to further the image of a modern day "Audie Murphy goes to Washington".

It may have worked for Kerry early on in his political career when he was just a liberal from Massachusetts. The powers of the new media with the help of The Swift Vets have exposed his history of lies and deceit. Stolen Honor is the latest and joins the book Unfit For Command, to do the duty the mainstream media was unwilling to take on.

Now in 2004, John Kerry tries to hide his 20-year campaign against our 2nd Amendment Rights, with a mock hunting trip. The Brady campaign gives Kerry a 100% voting record in his assault on guns. The NRA has chimed in and listed Kerry's record online.

Masking the truth might have worked well for John Kerry in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s to further his agenda, but not in 2004. This "October disguise" will only help to expose Kerry as the blatant opportunist he is. On November 3rd, John Kerry will wake up and find he has plenty of time to go duck hunting.

http://gopandthecity.blogspot.com/2004/10/...t-his-guns.html

I bet they were pretty unbiased too.

Just like Gary. ;)

Better yet, they were there. Were you?

So Gary, it's fair game to go after a candidate's military record, yes or no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
995150_4aca7184e2.jpg

We have seen this shell game before. John Kerry stepping out for a staged photo-op, brandishing a gun for political gain. While this time, Kerry's foray with a gun did not result in a few disputed medals; he still used a prop to further his political future. Back in 'Nam, he staged mock battles and carried an 8mm camera with him to snap images. These movies were to show people (voters) back home that he was some sort of hero. While most men were worried about not coming back while grasping their M-16, Kerry was thinking about how to use the system to get out early, get all the right medals, and a develop a few good stories to further the image of a modern day "Audie Murphy goes to Washington".

It may have worked for Kerry early on in his political career when he was just a liberal from Massachusetts. The powers of the new media with the help of The Swift Vets have exposed his history of lies and deceit. Stolen Honor is the latest and joins the book Unfit For Command, to do the duty the mainstream media was unwilling to take on.

Now in 2004, John Kerry tries to hide his 20-year campaign against our 2nd Amendment Rights, with a mock hunting trip. The Brady campaign gives Kerry a 100% voting record in his assault on guns. The NRA has chimed in and listed Kerry's record online.

Masking the truth might have worked well for John Kerry in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s to further his agenda, but not in 2004. This "October disguise" will only help to expose Kerry as the blatant opportunist he is. On November 3rd, John Kerry will wake up and find he has plenty of time to go duck hunting.

http://gopandthecity.blogspot.com/2004/10/...t-his-guns.html

Yeah? What is your point other than Kerry was no hero. Like I said, the people that dispute Kerry's service were there. Were you?

995150_4aca7184e2.jpg

We have seen this shell game before. John Kerry stepping out for a staged photo-op, brandishing a gun for political gain. While this time, Kerry's foray with a gun did not result in a few disputed medals; he still used a prop to further his political future. Back in 'Nam, he staged mock battles and carried an 8mm camera with him to snap images. These movies were to show people (voters) back home that he was some sort of hero. While most men were worried about not coming back while grasping their M-16, Kerry was thinking about how to use the system to get out early, get all the right medals, and a develop a few good stories to further the image of a modern day "Audie Murphy goes to Washington".

It may have worked for Kerry early on in his political career when he was just a liberal from Massachusetts. The powers of the new media with the help of The Swift Vets have exposed his history of lies and deceit. Stolen Honor is the latest and joins the book Unfit For Command, to do the duty the mainstream media was unwilling to take on.

Now in 2004, John Kerry tries to hide his 20-year campaign against our 2nd Amendment Rights, with a mock hunting trip. The Brady campaign gives Kerry a 100% voting record in his assault on guns. The NRA has chimed in and listed Kerry's record online.

Masking the truth might have worked well for John Kerry in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s to further his agenda, but not in 2004. This "October disguise" will only help to expose Kerry as the blatant opportunist he is. On November 3rd, John Kerry will wake up and find he has plenty of time to go duck hunting.

http://gopandthecity.blogspot.com/2004/10/...t-his-guns.html

I bet they were pretty unbiased too.

Just like Gary. ;)

Better yet, they were there. Were you?

So Gary, it's fair game to go after a candidate's military record, yes or no?

When they lie about it like Kerry did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0895260174.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

I bet they were pretty unbiased too.

Just like Gary. ;)

Better yet, they were there. Were you?

They just trivialized another person's serving. Didn't you just get onto me about that in another thread?

Difference is, I won't pretend to speak for everyone else like you. Logically, they're playing a political game by "swiftboating" Kerry.

Of course, that's because it helped George W. Dumbass avoid actually talking about important issues. Good job, boys! :thumbs:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×