Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
panamania79

Pakistan could end cooperation on the war on terror.

12 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts


May 7,2007-USCIS received I-129f
July 24,2007-NOA1 was received
April 21,2008-K-1 visa denied.
June 3,2008-waiver filed at US Consalate in Panama
The interview went well,they told him it will take another 6 months for them to adjudicate the waiver
March 3,2009-US Consulate claims they have no record of our December visit,nor Manuel's interview
March 27,2009-Manuel returned to the consulate for another interrogation(because they forgot about December's interview),and they were really rude !
April 3,2009-US Counsalate asks for more court documents that no longer exist !
June 1,2009-Manuel and I go back to the US consalate AGAIN to give them a letter from the court in Colon along with documents I already gave them last year.I was surprised to see they had two thick files for his case !


June 15,2010-They called Manuel in to take his fingerprints again,still no decision on his case!
June 22,2010-WAIVER APPROVED at 5:00pm
July 19,2010-VISA IN MANUELITO'S HAND at 3:15pm!
July 25,2010-Manuelito arrives at 9:35pm at Logan Intn'l Airport,Boston,MA
August 5,2010-FINALLY MARRIED!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 23,2010-Filed for AOS at the International Institute of RI $1400!
December 23,2010-Work authorization received.
January 12,2011-RFE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much effect--as Pak military has long had elements in it sympathetic to Taliban, who have been supplying them with info. Maybe time to put the "cooperation" out of its misery.


2005/07/10 I-129F filed for Pras

2005/11/07 I-129F approved, forwarded to NVC--to Chennai Consulate 2005/11/14

2005/12/02 Packet-3 received from Chennai

2005/12/21 Visa Interview Date

2006/04/04 Pras' entry into US at DTW

2006/04/15 Church Wedding at Novi (Detroit suburb), MI

2006/05/01 AOS Packet (I-485/I-131/I-765) filed at Chicago

2006/08/23 AP and EAD approved. Two down, 1.5 to go

2006/10/13 Pras' I-485 interview--APPROVED!

2006/10/27 Pras' conditional GC arrives -- .5 to go (2 yrs to Conditions Removal)

2008/07/21 I-751 (conditions removal) filed

2008/08/22 I-751 biometrics completed

2009/06/18 I-751 approved

2009/07/03 10-year GC received; last 0.5 done!

2009/07/23 Pras files N-400

2009/11/16 My 46TH birthday, Pras N-400 approved

2010/03/18 Pras' swear-in

---------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the LORD's beside me, I don't care if this road ever ends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the result of the Bush administration's policy on pissing people off who are/were friends.

The Bush's,doing what they do best ! :yes:


May 7,2007-USCIS received I-129f
July 24,2007-NOA1 was received
April 21,2008-K-1 visa denied.
June 3,2008-waiver filed at US Consalate in Panama
The interview went well,they told him it will take another 6 months for them to adjudicate the waiver
March 3,2009-US Consulate claims they have no record of our December visit,nor Manuel's interview
March 27,2009-Manuel returned to the consulate for another interrogation(because they forgot about December's interview),and they were really rude !
April 3,2009-US Counsalate asks for more court documents that no longer exist !
June 1,2009-Manuel and I go back to the US consalate AGAIN to give them a letter from the court in Colon along with documents I already gave them last year.I was surprised to see they had two thick files for his case !


June 15,2010-They called Manuel in to take his fingerprints again,still no decision on his case!
June 22,2010-WAIVER APPROVED at 5:00pm
July 19,2010-VISA IN MANUELITO'S HAND at 3:15pm!
July 25,2010-Manuelito arrives at 9:35pm at Logan Intn'l Airport,Boston,MA
August 5,2010-FINALLY MARRIED!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 23,2010-Filed for AOS at the International Institute of RI $1400!
December 23,2010-Work authorization received.
January 12,2011-RFE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the result of the Bush administration's policy on pissing people off who are/were friends.

The whole world doesn't revolve around the U.S.. Pakistan has its own foreign policy goals against India and gaining influence in Afghanistan under the Taliban both of which predate Bush. There's a lot of internal dissent in Pakistan that has little to do with Bush and will continue after he is gone.

That's way too complex for your mindset so we'll leave it at that.

Edited by alienlovechild

David & Lalai

th_ourweddingscrapbook-1.jpg

aneska1-3-1-1.gif

Greencard Received Date: July 3, 2009

Lifting of Conditions : March 18, 2011

I-751 Application Sent: April 23, 2011

Biometrics: June 9, 2011

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the result of the Bush administration's policy on pissing people off who are/were friends.

The whole world doesn't revolve around the U.S.. Pakistan has its own foreign policy goals against India and gaining influence in Afghanistan under the Taliban both of which predate Bush. There's a lot of internal dissent in Pakistan that has little to do with Bush and will continue after he is gone.

That's way too complex for your mindset so we'll leave it at that.

Well guess what, Pakistan may very well have a leader that is more sympathetic to the U.S. So if this administration's foreign policy didn't comprise of being complete retards (boy, more rhetoric against Venezuela now.. making friends everywhere), they might be able to gather some political influence on Pakistan, thus helping their situation both there and Afghanistan. No, of course not, that must be too complex for your mindset.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the result of the Bush administration's policy on pissing people off who are/were friends.

The whole world doesn't revolve around the U.S.. Pakistan has its own foreign policy goals against India and gaining influence in Afghanistan under the Taliban both of which predate Bush. There's a lot of internal dissent in Pakistan that has little to do with Bush and will continue after he is gone.

That's way too complex for your mindset so we'll leave it at that.

Well guess what, Pakistan may very well have a leader that is more sympathetic to the U.S. So if this administration's foreign policy didn't comprise of being complete retards (boy, more rhetoric against Venezuela now.. making friends everywhere), they might be able to gather some political influence on Pakistan, thus helping their situation both there and Afghanistan. No, of course not, that must be too complex for your mindset.

Well said !


May 7,2007-USCIS received I-129f
July 24,2007-NOA1 was received
April 21,2008-K-1 visa denied.
June 3,2008-waiver filed at US Consalate in Panama
The interview went well,they told him it will take another 6 months for them to adjudicate the waiver
March 3,2009-US Consulate claims they have no record of our December visit,nor Manuel's interview
March 27,2009-Manuel returned to the consulate for another interrogation(because they forgot about December's interview),and they were really rude !
April 3,2009-US Counsalate asks for more court documents that no longer exist !
June 1,2009-Manuel and I go back to the US consalate AGAIN to give them a letter from the court in Colon along with documents I already gave them last year.I was surprised to see they had two thick files for his case !


June 15,2010-They called Manuel in to take his fingerprints again,still no decision on his case!
June 22,2010-WAIVER APPROVED at 5:00pm
July 19,2010-VISA IN MANUELITO'S HAND at 3:15pm!
July 25,2010-Manuelito arrives at 9:35pm at Logan Intn'l Airport,Boston,MA
August 5,2010-FINALLY MARRIED!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 23,2010-Filed for AOS at the International Institute of RI $1400!
December 23,2010-Work authorization received.
January 12,2011-RFE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well guess what, Pakistan may very well have a leader that is more sympathetic to the U.S. So if this administration's foreign policy didn't comprise of being complete retards (boy, more rhetoric against Venezuela now.. making friends everywhere), they might be able to gather some political influence on Pakistan, thus helping their situation both there and Afghanistan. No, of course not, that must be too complex for your mindset.

Pakistan and Venezuela have nothing in common but it shows you don't much knowledge about that region either. Here's a clue- they don't share a common border or continent for that matter.

I'll give you chance to redeem yourself. What can Pres. Obama (I don't care if he ain't your favorite) do to improve relations and what will Pakistan do for us in return? Simple questions.


David & Lalai

th_ourweddingscrapbook-1.jpg

aneska1-3-1-1.gif

Greencard Received Date: July 3, 2009

Lifting of Conditions : March 18, 2011

I-751 Application Sent: April 23, 2011

Biometrics: June 9, 2011

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pakistan and Venezuela have nothing in common but it shows you don't much knowledge about that region either. Here's a clue- they don't share a common border or continent for that matter.

Wow, great reading, I clearly suggested that Venezuela and Pakistan are next to each other.

:rofl:

Attempt at belittlement = fail.

I'll give you chance to redeem yourself. What can Pres. Obama (I don't care if he ain't your favorite) do to improve relations and what will Pakistan do for us in return? Simple questions.

With his foreign policy? Nothing.

Unfortunately, like the Democrats in Congress, he would cave to politically correct Republican Rovian tactics and continue opening this recent rift between the U.S. and Pakistan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll give you chance to redeem yourself. What can Pres. Obama (I don't care if he ain't your favorite) do to improve relations and what will Pakistan do for us in return? Simple questions.

With his foreign policy? Nothing.

Unfortunately, like the Democrats in Congress, he would cave to politically correct Republican Rovian tactics and continue opening this recent rift between the U.S. and Pakistan.

Contradiction there since politically correct is the province of liberals and Rove wouldn't fall into that category. So your saying Pres. Obama will have no power even if the Democrats control Congress because of the Republican minority? I can't help but belittle somebody who apparently never had a government 101 class. When a president and his party control the White House and Congress the minority party can't do much on foreign policy. Domestic political considerations aren't the sole or most important driver of U.S. foreign policy and it more likely the Republicans will cave in to Obama since they prize national security. Happened with Bosnia and Serbia under Clinton and the Repulicans controlled Congress.


David & Lalai

th_ourweddingscrapbook-1.jpg

aneska1-3-1-1.gif

Greencard Received Date: July 3, 2009

Lifting of Conditions : March 18, 2011

I-751 Application Sent: April 23, 2011

Biometrics: June 9, 2011

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Contradiction there since politically correct is the province of liberals and Rove wouldn't fall into that category.

Actually, no, the Rove tactic is to turn an issue into a politically correct one by making another candidate's views or actions seem extreme. So yes, it is to turn something into a politically incorrect view by skewing it.

So your saying Pres. Obama will have no power even if the Democrats control Congress because of the Republican minority?

Nope. Fail at reading again. He wouldn't do anything to improve relations.

I can't help but belittle somebody who apparently never had a government 101 class.

Well, you'd be retarded in belittling someone who has had a government 101 class. Another person pretending to know about someone and getting it wrong. Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?

When a president and his party control the White House and Congress the minority party can't do much on foreign policy.

They can at least work across the isle and get something done. Something both parties failed at doing, besides stupid ####### like the PATRIOT Act, or the authorizing of force against Iraq. Again, using Karl Rove tactics, they made the public believe that someone rational in opposing it was un-American. Funny thing is, the un-Americans were right. As usual.

Domestic political considerations aren't the sole or most important driver of U.S. foreign policy and it more likely the Republicans will cave in to Obama since they prize national security. Happened with Bosnia and Serbia under Clinton and the Repulicans controlled Congress.

That was a bit of a different Republican Congress. There were actually moderates willing to work across the table 10 years ago, as well as moderate Rockefeller Republicans. This one is far more extreme, far more uncompromising, far more ideological. And the captain obvious statement is yet another laugh -- "domestic political considerations aren't the sole or most important driver of U.S. foreign policy". :rofl:

However, Bush did prove your statement incorrect. He had his own agenda against Iraq, and by making ####### up about them having WMD's, possessing, obtaining, yadda yadda, he used his own, or even borrowed from daddy's foreign policy of wasting American lives and taxpayer money going to a place that will ultimately result in zero accomplishments. And here we are again. Nothing learned by you. Nothing new to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nope. Fail at reading again. He wouldn't do anything to improve relations.

So it doesn't matter if Obama, McCain or Bugs Bunny is running foreign policy with Pakistan.

Well, you'd be retarded in belittling someone who has had a government 101 class.

Was in a class on American government?

Domestic political considerations aren't the sole or most important driver of U.S. foreign policy and it more likely the Republicans will cave in to Obama since they prize national security. Happened with Bosnia and Serbia under Clinton and the Repulicans controlled Congress.

That was a bit of a different Republican Congress. There were actually moderates willing to work across the table 10 years ago, as well as moderate Rockefeller Republicans. This one is far more extreme, far more uncompromising, far more ideological. And the captain obvious statement is yet another laugh -- "domestic political considerations aren't the sole or most important driver of U.S. foreign policy".

The make-up of the Republicans inCongress is conjecture but we know they lost power in 2006 and the conservatives never had a presidential favorite so I there's no strong conservative presence doing anything regardless of what you may think.

However, Bush did prove your statement incorrect. He had his own agenda against Iraq, and by making ####### up about them having WMD's, possessing, obtaining, yadda yadda, he used his own, or even borrowed from daddy's foreign policy of wasting American lives and taxpayer money going to a place that will ultimately result in zero accomplishments. And here we are again. Nothing learned by you. Nothing new to me.

How exactly were Bush's domestic political powers increased by losing control of Congress mostly because of Iraq in 2006? How exactly does spending billions abroad in Iraq aid Republicans in Congress who could use the money bring pork to their districts? Wouldn't a stronger economy increase Republican popularity? Clearly, foreign policy goals overshadowed the long term political prospects for the Republicans. All of those facts are new to you because you have no clue beyond recycled statements circa 2003.


David & Lalai

th_ourweddingscrapbook-1.jpg

aneska1-3-1-1.gif

Greencard Received Date: July 3, 2009

Lifting of Conditions : March 18, 2011

I-751 Application Sent: April 23, 2011

Biometrics: June 9, 2011

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×