Jump to content
I AM NOT THAT GUY

Did Hillary Commit a Felony?

82 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Shannen Coffin’s excellent column today points out that Mrs. Clinton’s Clintonesque shenanigans not only appear to be a clear violation of the Federal Records Act; she may also have violated a federal penal statute that makes it a felony for the custodian of government records to conceal or otherwise tamper with them.

http://nation.foxnews.com/2015/03/05/did-hillary-commit-felony

If charged, will she go to trial? If convicted, will Obama pardon her?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3:30 why would I use e-mails


If more citizens were armed, criminals would think twice about attacking them, Detroit Police Chief James Craig

Florida currently has more concealed-carry permit holders than any other state, with 1,269,021 issued as of May 14, 2014

The liberal elite ... know that the people simply cannot be trusted; that they are incapable of just and fair self-government; that left to their own devices, their society will be racist, sexist, homophobic, and inequitable -- and the liberal elite know how to fix things. They are going to help us live the good and just life, even if they have to lie to us and force us to do it. And they detest those who stand in their way."
- A Nation Of Cowards, by Jeffrey R. Snyder

Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama

white-privilege.jpg?resize=318%2C318

Democrats>Socialists>Communists - Same goals, different speeds.

#DeplorableLivesMatter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-03/hdr22clintonemailcom-how-romanian-hacker-exposed-hillary-clintons-secret-email-life

The answer, shockingly, comes courtesy of a Romanian hacker who was known by the handle "Guccifer", and who is currently serving time in a Bucharest prison for his online attacks against countless public figures including the infamous leaks of George W. Bush personal paintings.

How is it possible that a Romanian convict may have helped accelerate the downfall of Warren Buffett's presidential hopeful? According to the Smoking Gun, which first reported on this topic back in March 2013, “Guccifer” illegally accessed the AOL e-mail account of Sidney Blumenthal, who then worked as a senior White House adviser to President Bill Clinton, and later became a senior adviser to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign.

When “Guccifer” (who was later identified as Marcel Lazar Lehel) breached Blumenthal’s account, he discovered an assortment of correspondence sent to Hillary Clinton at the e-mail address
. The “clintonemail.com” domain was registered in 2009, shortly after her nomination to become Secretary of State.

While Blumenthal, a longtime Hillary Clinton confidant, used her private e-mail to send personal messages (like a get well note after she fell at home and suffered a concussion in December 2012), he also forwarded the Cabinet member a series of “Confidential” memos about foreign policy matters.

A snapshot of one leaked email between Blumenthal and Clinton can be seen below:


If more citizens were armed, criminals would think twice about attacking them, Detroit Police Chief James Craig

Florida currently has more concealed-carry permit holders than any other state, with 1,269,021 issued as of May 14, 2014

The liberal elite ... know that the people simply cannot be trusted; that they are incapable of just and fair self-government; that left to their own devices, their society will be racist, sexist, homophobic, and inequitable -- and the liberal elite know how to fix things. They are going to help us live the good and just life, even if they have to lie to us and force us to do it. And they detest those who stand in their way."
- A Nation Of Cowards, by Jeffrey R. Snyder

Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama

white-privilege.jpg?resize=318%2C318

Democrats>Socialists>Communists - Same goals, different speeds.

#DeplorableLivesMatter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are the same people who believe W was responsible for 9/11... Are you surprised?

Oh Lord, not the Benghazi nonsense again. How many times does that false right wing nut job narrative have to be debunked for even the last stupid fool on the far right edge to get it? smh


200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She actually said that and I was being facetious or trying a shot at sarcasm, but it does seem to fit if she really was doing some funny business with her e-mails that she knew she shouldn't. But the response could fitting as timing is everything.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/03/03/hillary-clintons-private-email-address-at-state-reinforces-everything-people-dont-like-about-her/

And it's good to know she got Marie Harf on the job for State, that should straighten things right out.

Edited by khwaidee1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama counsel not aware of Clinton's email practice

WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House counsel's office was not aware at the time Hillary Rodham Clinton was secretary of state that she relied solely on personal email and only found out as part of the congressional investigation into the Benghazi attack, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The person said Clinton's exclusive reliance on personal email as the nation's top diplomat was inconsistent with the guidance given to agencies that official business should be conducted on official email accounts. Once the State Department turned over some of her messages in connection with the Benghazi investigation after she left office, making it apparent she had not followed the guidance, the White House counsel's office asked the department to ensure that her email records were properly archived, according to the person who spoke on a condition of anonymity without authorization to speak on the record.

Clinton announced in a late-night tweet Wednesday that she wants her emails released. She asked the State Department to vet the 55,000-plus pages she handed over, leaving the diplomatic agency with the intensely politicized task of determining which can be made public.

Clinton's successor, Secretary of State John Kerry, told reporters Thursday during a trip to Saudi Arabia the State Department will move immediately to review the emails but cautioned it will take time. "We will undertake this task as rapidly as possible in order to make sure that we are dealing with the sheer volume in a responsible way," Kerry said.

http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-emails-inject-obamas-administration-2016-fray-081233081--election.html

More than inconsistent - it is a violation of federal law - embezzlement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be amazed if she was charged with anything because of the thorough corruption in our government. The most highly illegal things we can see she was involved in constituted direct support for terrorist organizations, including Al Qaeda, and Benghazi was an example of that where arms were being funneled to Syrian jihadis. It has been widely published with pieces by Seymour Hersh for example, but since McCain and others were also busy making sure ISIS had enough Toyotas and machine guns to run wild in the middle east, they can only complain about embassy security instead of what they were DOING through the embassy.

We live in a "They did it too" political world now. Since everyone is a criminal, nobody can be picked out for being one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More than inconsistent - it is a violation of federal law - embezzlement.

This is a bit of a stretch. The two alternate prongs of the statute are:

embezzles, steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use or the use of another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of

or

receives, conceals, or retains the same with intent to convert it to his use or gain, knowing it to have been embezzled, stolen, purloined or converted

The latter of these two prongs is almost certainly inapplicable -- if we argue that Hillary has received/concealed/retained the emails, how can one establish she had the mens rea to convert it to her "use or gain" -- and what would be the "use or gain"? Of more interest is the former of these, and we can pretty much throw out embezzling or knowing conversion of the emails. So we get down to stealing or purloining (which are essentially the same thing -- I think the statute is just being cute). I think a case could be made for larceny, but again there's a mens rea issue. Since larceny requires the intent to steal or permanently deprive or defraud (the adverb modifies both verbs), can it be proven that Hillary had the requisite intent?

Then again, I'm a Dummocrat, so you know I'm at least a little Team Killary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a bit of a stretch. The two alternate prongs of the statute are:

or

The latter of these two prongs is almost certainly inapplicable -- if we argue that Hillary has received/concealed/retained the emails, how can one establish she had the mens rea to convert it to her "use or gain" -- and what would be the "use or gain"? Of more interest is the former of these, and we can pretty much throw out embezzling or knowing conversion of the emails. So we get down to stealing or purloining (which are essentially the same thing -- I think the statute is just being cute). I think a case could be made for larceny, but again there's a mens rea issue. Since larceny requires the intent to steal or permanently deprive or defraud (the adverb modifies both verbs), can it be proven that Hillary had the requisite intent?

Then again, I'm a Dummocrat, so you know I'm at least a little Team Killary.

The full phrase in part one is

Whoever embezzles, steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use or the use of another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, or any property made or being made under contract for the United States or any department or agency thereof;

And for whatever reason, the charge is embezzlement, as least at it was described by Judge Napolitano.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


If more citizens were armed, criminals would think twice about attacking them, Detroit Police Chief James Craig

Florida currently has more concealed-carry permit holders than any other state, with 1,269,021 issued as of May 14, 2014

The liberal elite ... know that the people simply cannot be trusted; that they are incapable of just and fair self-government; that left to their own devices, their society will be racist, sexist, homophobic, and inequitable -- and the liberal elite know how to fix things. They are going to help us live the good and just life, even if they have to lie to us and force us to do it. And they detest those who stand in their way."
- A Nation Of Cowards, by Jeffrey R. Snyder

Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama

white-privilege.jpg?resize=318%2C318

Democrats>Socialists>Communists - Same goals, different speeds.

#DeplorableLivesMatter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Embezzlement is a kind of property theft. It occurs when a defendant, who was entrusted to manage or monitor someone else’s money or property, steals all or part of that money or property for the defendant’s personal gain. The key is that the defendant had legal access to another’s money or property, but not legal ownership of it. Taking the money or property for the defendant’s own gain is stealing; when combined with the fact that this stealing was also a violation of a special position of trust, you have the unique crime of embezzlement.

http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/criminal-offense/federal-embezzlement-laws.htm

That kinda fits better than larceny or theft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×