Trumplestiltskin

How can they have acted 'no differently' if they didn't evacuate the school because of the 'suitcase bomb'?

We go from a kid who was previously suspended for fighting and blowing soap bubbles in a bathroom to the bizarre suggestion that somehow, collectively, these incidents are some meaningful indication that he will be a danger to society in the future.
Kids fight and bully each other and kids seen as 'different' get it worst. That's a natural part of what the school experience is. If anything, from his comments km this story it seems Ahmed's former teacher has no ethical standards.
Meanwhile the police and the city mayor will admit to no wrongdoing whatsoever and instead want to present the similarly bizarre idea that a 14 year old wanted to pull off a publicity stunt. Interesting how none of the authority figures here seem concerned with the child's welfare, only with protecting their own image. That should tell people something.
It's amazing the lengths people will go to to try and assassinate someone's character just because they were involved in something that made the news.

I get that's what you believe. Where's the proof?

Except the Jew running Facebook is apparently also anti semitic. Go figure.

Must be a Jewish conspiracy?
Oh, the joys of VJ!

They cared enough to create the controversy in the first place...

People who went to Woodstock probably can't remember past last week let alone back to 1969.

Whatever you think it is, history it ain't.

Whatever you think it is, history it ain't.

There's nothing to deflect. Showing basic empathy to other human beings doesn't require anything tangible or material on the part of people in this forum to prove anything. It's all sentiment and as far as that sentiment goes it seems that many of the people here woukd rather identify with a guns and ammo company rather than a bereaved family who may have made a poor decision arising from their personal tragedy.

There's nothing to deflect. Showing basic empathy to other human beings doesn't require anything tangible or material on the part of people in this forum to prove anything. It's all sentiment and as far as that sentiment goes it seems that many of the people here woukd rather identify with a guns and ammo company rather than a bereaved family who may have made a poor decision arising from their personal tragedy.

It's a bereaved family. If you can't relate to that you need to do some soul searching.
Instead of cherrypicking random posts out of context and expecting me to justify something beyond what was intended why don't you, in your own words, just say exactly what you want to say?

It's every woman's worst nightmare: sending a picture message intended for your boyfriend to your boss.
And one woman's nightmare became a reality when she did just that.
An anonymous woman who was attempting to send a late night Snapchat to her partner accidentally sent it to her boss.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3253312/What-missing-weekend-Woman-accidentally-sends-BOSS-naked-Snapchat-response-make-cringe.html#ixzz3n8lf6L00
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

They cared enough to create the controversy in the first place...

As clear an indication as any of deliberately selective reading. Don't give up your day job.

I think you're overestimating your supposed consensus.

I think you're overestimating your supposed consensus.

Folks on the forum who appear to not care about the family at all...
Do you think the family should have to pay the legal fees?

No, he thinks the company should just not collect the fees. I understand why they won't, the fees themselves will discourage future litigation of this nature.

The point is, it's not mandatory.
Your choice of words needs serious work.

I always take note of cheap graffiti .

Why is there a reason to use this phrase?

Why is there a reason to use this phrase?

Islamophobia in Texas!?
Shocking.

Islamophobia in Texas!?
Shocking.