Jump to content

Marklor

Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Marklor

  1. Yes, as the poster above explained, your description of the situation was not really accurate here. I think it's better to try and avoid spreading that around, but in any event, I'm glad you posted it so it could be cleared up. Thanks!
  2. The best advantage to me is being together faster, so if that were by chance approved, it would have been the fastest approval. I understand the other limitations, but that is my subjective take. To each their own.
  3. Firsthand from an officer — on here? I don't think they post here. So, it'd be secondhand from the applicants. But anyway, thanks for the well wishes.
  4. Alright. But personally, if the post doesn’t have a firsthand account from an officer declaring that’s what actually happened, I’m filing it into the “doubt” box regardless. Thanks for the info anyway, I’m still going to file this as it’s considered a valid legal procedure by the US government de jure.
  5. Never said I would. A very small amount are still issued, you can see that online. Someone gets them.
  6. I think, without providing details, I’d assume they denied the I-130 for legitimate reasons; at least, I would before implying people are (seemingly spitefully) being denied I-130 merely for having the gall to file I-129F.
  7. Hey, wow, the notice came in the mail today anyway. It's only been 4 days since I filed online.
  8. The online receipt doesn't have anything like Form I-797C or Notice of Action printed on it. It has the receipt number, and does say "Notice Type: Receipt Notice". I want to file 129F now because the estimate is so long, maybe I'll actually be one of the 1-2 who get them, but I need to attach a receipt doc. Is this that doc? Thanks all.
  9. Thanks a lot. Clear answer for the question at hand. If we do move, do we need to update something else or it can also wait?
  10. hello, no rudeness intended, I just wanted to be clear that it was not my question. thanks.
  11. Not my question. the last day of my address history no longer matches the PD or the apply date (which are the same as I already got receipt) Thanks, hope you’re correct.
  12. This wouldn't be a problem, except I filed online. So, in the 5 years address history, due to the glitch that you can't input PRESENT, I listed living at my most recent place of residence as "until oct 28" (the present date I submitted). That being said, my current address, the same address (in the different section) is still the same address, but it just seems so wrong to flip the date like that. Does anyone think this will affect something?
  13. Yes, that’s an understandable interpretation as well, but I felt the way the paragraph was structured did not make explicit or not if “each” sheet included the primary additional information sheet. Hence, my question. I was concerned that by signing the other page, it would then obligate us to sign this page, whereas an absence of signatures of page 3 and page 6 would have been equally acceptable, (both or none, essentially.) trying to be careful here.
  14. That page does ask for that though and I am trying to do due diligence in order to fill out as intended. Attaching the relevant image.
  15. Fair enough. What about the last page for additional information? Should it be signed and dated?
  16. Well it is different because if your spouse is abroad it implies she mailed some master docs to the petitioner, who then mailed docs to the consulate or applied there direct. With scanning, it’s a lot of time saved but it’s a copy, not the original. as for the final bit about her location, that is a fair point.
  17. Hmm. There are no “pages” in the online form and the preview PDF seems to be kind of glitchy. If you’re talking about specifying a consulate, I specified Warsaw, Poland. she is abroad. But we have access to scanners and printers, of course. I am just asking if doing these things will hurt us. also on I-130a, on page 6, with additional information, should she sign and date here also? Good to know, but we’ll be filing online. It seems a lot different, but I’ve already committed to this path, I suppose.
  18. So, flee the country, but in order for your spouse to get an EU visa to attend an interview in Poland, a country where Russian tourists are also now banned, your spouse will need to spend 2-3 months waiting in said dangerous country for an EU visa to another EU country in order for the chance to cross the Schengen border later, and then after this is processed, they'll somehow need to make it out of Russia in time despite the fact that all the country exits and airplane tickets are now completely flooded or sold out by people fleeing after the draft and now annexation announcements. Oh, and by the way, no country will accept transfers of your case. P.S. hope you got a western vaccine somehow. P.P.S hope you didn't have even the slightest error in your docs otherwise you'll have to deal with this mess x100 including lots of time and $$$. Good luck sustaining a healthy relationship in this situation and thanks for your understanding during these difficult times! OK
×
×
  • Create New...