Jump to content

speedster

Members
  • Posts

    221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • State
    New York

speedster's Achievements

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The video the sitting president posted is a clip of 2 black people as apes, the video the sitting president posted did not have the whole jungle clip, just 2 black people as apes. So again, You're defending the clip in the video depicting 2 black people as apes. Black people as apes has centuries of racist association to it.
  2. Oh really do show proof that "he was harboring two noncitizen sex-offenders."
  3. You're defending a video depicting 2 black people as apes. The racist association of that spans centuries. And not a single "yeah that's wrong and racist to post"
  4. There was outrage in some aspects of course, not to this scale though cause Obama and Biden followed due process and didn't violate multiple orders by judges. But sure keep defending the agency that has lied again and again. Took a US Citizen dragged out in the cold half naked and violating his 4th amendment rights. Defend the violation of the constitution and defend the no apology given. "Judge Schiltz wrote that ICE has likely violated more court orders this month than some agencies have violated in their entire existence." That doesn't give you any pause to think something is wrong? https://www.npr.org/2026/01/31/nx-s1-5693175/judge-says-immigration-and-customs-enforcement-has-violated-96-court-orders-this-month-in-minn
  5. Or a sex scandal involving Bill Clinton got him civil contempt of court and impeachment. But let's forget how trump being a racist depicting the Obama's as apes. I mean MAGA lovers also laughed and enjoyed seeing Trump made fun of someones disability which would've easily fired someone, suspend someone in school, or even better yet derail a political career. Mask off moment for the racists that support that action.
  6. Read what I said before commenting into a conclusion: "Could it be ICE breaking car windows to snatch people out of cars? Maybe but loads of glass shards are on the floor it wasn't moved to there after the fact." I never said it was ICE cause the likely chance of 5 cars lined up with people inside all 5 cars and ICE deciding to take all of them is near nil. The cherry picking on top of never providing evidence is astounding.
  7. How do we know if it was rioters? Just cause he says so? 3 out of the 5 cars he's showing in that block are not from MN (different plate features). So could it be rioters? Maybe but that's not their route to be at historically. Could it be ICE breaking car windows to snatch people out of cars? Maybe but loads of glass shards are on the floor it wasn't moved to there after the fact. Could be anything really but probably just a vandal or a thief looking into what they can get. Also why is he not showing more than those 5, I see loads of cars right there on a full street without any windows broken. The word "downtown" is doing some heavy lifting as that street is not downtown Minneapolis. The street filmed is riddled with historical data of vandalism crime against cars. That only took me less than 10 minutes to research, with easily public available information. So much for "journalism"
  8. Picture was proven to be someone else. Didn't know this forum hates people that consider themselves as trans or cross dressing, let people live their life. It's the reason why so many people have come here.
  9. Yes it has been confirmed, DHS admitted it on their own.
  10. Let me introduce you to Kyle Rittenhouse ->
  11. Well for starters the US Citizen Hmong man who's door was battered into illegally, without a warrant, without an apology or paying for damages to the house, and dragging him half naked in the cold. That's an example of unconstitutional.
  12. I'll say it again, the quote you highlighted had this: "we will not participate in unconstitutional arrests of our neighbors" Does it say anything about final orders of deportation in that sentence or anything about the INA? No it doesn't.
  13. "we will not participate in unconstitutional arrests of our neighbors" Does it say anything about final orders of deportation in that sentence or anything about the INA? No it doesn't.
  14. "we will not participate in unconstitutional arrests of our neighbors" So you want him to participate in unconstitutional arrests? Good job
  15. I've provided the evidence including a second by second breakdown of all the video angles out there. Including proof with the youtube video provided. I asked you for your proof, you provided none.
×
×
  • Create New...