f1660114

Exactly. We are in the ROC phase now awaiting adjudication, and we included G-1145 forms with everything we've ever submitted (I-129F, AOS/EAD/AP, and ROC) and have never received a text or email from USCIS - not even once. So don't panic too much if you don't receive electronic notification. Just keep an eye out for the other things as mentioned (check clearance, paper notification, etc...).

That makes sense because for ROC phase you did not send the package to the lock-box. Only applications sent to lock-box (i.e. N-400, I-129F, I-485, I-130, etc...) can use the form G-1145. ROC I-751 is to send to Service Center so G-1145 does not apply.

If your spouse cooperates and you guys reach to a mutual agreement then Summary Dissolution is the best way to go since you will have the Final Divorce Date within a month. That is a one-step process while Regular Divorce takes longer time to have the Final Date since it requires more steps and more time.

Current status: Nat. Cert. in hand.

Done FP today (was rescheduled, the original FP date is 12/16/15). Please update for me. Thanks much.

Today I got the oath letter dated 1/8/16 for a ceremony taken place in Los Angeles on 1/20/16. Please help me update. Thanks guys.

Received interview letter today with the interview date 1/6/16. Can anyone please update? Thanks.

I made a note that my case is a divorce waiver so other users can reference it. Thanks.

California Service Center (11 applicants, 0 approved - 0%)

VJName..............Date of I-751...NOA1 Date....Biometrics.....Approved
LISEL N JAVIER........10/28/15......11/03/15......--/--/15......--/--/--
DAVEYKINS.............10/31/15......--/--/15......--/--/15......--/--/--
WITHGODSHELP..........10/31/15......11/02/15......--/--/15......--/--/--(Divorce waiver)
KUMI AND DRAKE........11/03/15......11/05/15......--/--/15......--/--/--
PANDA1................11/07/15......11/09/15......--/--/15......--/--/--

ROSEJAMES.............11/07/15......--/--/15......--/--/15......--/--/--

CALIOC2013............11/12/15......11/12/15......--/--/15......--/--/--

F1660114..............11/12/15......11/16/15......--/--/15......--/--/--(Divorce waiver)

XXJULZXX..............11/14/15......--/--/15......--/--/15......--/--/--

HG&TG.................11/16/15......--/--/15......--/--/15......--/--/--

TITTYSPRINKLES........11/16/15......--/--/15......--/--/15......--/--/--

Vermont Service Center (3 applicants, 0 approved - 0%)

VJName..............Date of I-751...NOA1 Date....Biometrics.....Approved
DANNYPHAN91...........10/29/15......11/03/15......--/--/15......--/--/--
JAMAICAN_GOONER.......11/06/15......11/10/15......--/--/15......--/--/--
XTRASOME..............11/10/15......--/--/15......--/--/15......--/--/--

IMPORTANT!

* Make sure that your VJ Text Editor setting is set to Rich Text Editor.
* Go to the MOST RECENTLY POSTED VERSION of this list (go to the last post and scroll UP) and "Reply" to it, deleting the "quote" tags in your reply.
* Please DO NOT change the font, font size, add colors, stuff like that.
* Please PREVIEW before posting to make sure it is properly formatted.
* Please check that you have not deleted anyone's NAME & DATA.

Date of I-751 = The Date you sent your application.
NOA Date = The Receipt Date on your original NOA letter.
Biometrics = The Date of your biometrics appointment.
Approved = The Date your case was approved.

* Please Capitalize your VJ Name when adding it to the list.
* When you're on this list, please come back to update your information accordingly.
* If you cannot add your information yourself, please ask another VJ member to help you do so.

Can anyone please add my case: Waiver divorce case, CSC, Date of I-751 11/12/15, NOA 11/16/15. Thanks.

I got this message today:

"On October 22, 2015, we started the interview scheduling process for your Form N-400, Application for Naturalization"

Please update my info: got FP notice on 10/6, got FP 10/20. Thanks.

I mailed it out 9/16 using UPS Ground, I received hard copy NOA1 10/1. Thanks.

Please add me to the sheet. GD date: 9/9/2010, received 9/18, NOA1 9/25, Santa Ana CA. Thanks.

My thought is that you should schedule InfoPass at your local field office and get it sorted out asap else you will get delay in naturalization stage later on definitely.

PD April 9 LIN#xxxxxxx approved this early morning. Relaxed.

We need more info. Does she have AOS approved yet or still pending? K1 visa is a one-time visa and it has been canceled upon her entry of US so she cannot reenter with K-1 visa. If AOS is still pending she needs to have a valid EAD/AP combo card to enter US after visiting VN.

Here is my situation and any input would be appreciated:

Married 4/2013 to LPR spouse and LPR spouse later became USC 6/2014;

Got green card CR6 1/5/2015, expired 1/5/2017

Divorced granted 4/2015 and will be finalized 10/2015 (California Summary Dissolution, judgment has been entered and divorce was granted, certified divorce decree on hand already)

My question is when is the earliest time that I can start to submit i-751 waiver? Do I have to wait until 10/2015 for the divorce to be finalized and submit it along with the i751 package or I can start submit i751 right now and send the divorce decree within 87 days (should be around the time it becomes final)? Please share your thoughts. Thanks everybody.

Thanks Jimmy. I know those are extreme cases and it'd better to avoid such a hassle by applying 90 days after moving to a certain place.

Examination on the application is the interview, not the receipt of the application.

Thanks Jimmy, can you read my original post and confirm that applicant has no problem for 3-month residence requirement? Thanks.

Examination on the application = receipt of application, it is not interview.

Thanks for your input.

If examination on the application = receipt of application, applicant should wait three months before filing. However, I found another wording from USCIS that might make the confusion here in the following sentence. Here is the direct quote found on www.uscis.gov/policymanual/HTML/PolicyManual-Volume12-PartG-Chapter3.html "In cases where an applicant has filed early and the required ​three-month​ period of residence in a ​s​tate or Service District falls within the required three-year period of continuous residence, jurisdiction​ is ​based on the three-month period immediately preceding the examination on the application (interview).​"

If the examination on the application is actually the interview not the receipt of filing, they should change the wording so no confusion should be made.

Can anyone correct if I am wrong?

(5) Immediately preceding the filing of an application, or immediately preceding the examination on the application if the application was filed early pursuant to Section 334(a) of the Act and the three month period falls within the required period of residence under Section 316(a) or 319(a) of the Act, has resided, as defined under § 316.5, for at least three months in a State or Service district having jurisdiction over the applicant's actual place of residence; (Amended effective 11/28/2011, 76 FR 53764)

If my GC date is 09/01/2010 I can file N400 at TX today, then tomorrow I move to NY and then later scheduled for interview on 09/15/2015 at NY. To my understanding, I still satisfy the requirement of 90 days resided in the same district as stated in the phrase "immediately preceding the examination on the application (which is conducted on 09/15/2015)". Please share your advice.

How can that be possible when someone who applied for naturalization on 01/30/15 (11 days before me) took oath to become a citizen on 05/29/15 and someone else who also applied on 01/30/15 have an interview set for 07/02/15 and another person who applied on 02/09/15 (3 days after me) has an interview set for 06/18/15...something is wrong here when it supposed to be first come first serve.

Please don't panic. It is just your background check took longer than the others. You will hear from them soon. Good luck.

Yes, he is eligible for his citizenship derived from his father.

I see that you are talking about the welfare abuse and yes I am also not advocating for that because we pay taxes for the abuser. My point here is if people have enough proof to get fee waiver they should get the fee waived. The OP should get her fee waived because she is eligible for that. I also that if a lot of people abuse that waiver, consequently USCIS will raise the fee to cover their operation but that is how life goes. Again I just want to make clear that eligible person should get their fee waived else government should not implement I-912.

Hhm, I did not say that welfare will give you whatever you need, friend. It is just the supplementary help from the government. And if you still cannot see my points here then I could not go any further in this discussion.

I don't believe in welfare. I understand disability, but not welfare. If you have 2 legs and 2 feet and know how to use them, there is no reason why you should be on welfare. Working minimum wage job full time will pay just as much.

Yes, I agree with you partially. But you just omit the facts that there are cases people cannot afford their lives with minimum wages if they have dependents to take care. Lazy people are shameful but if a person cannot actually afford their life then welfare should be obtained.