Jon in RC

so reading more stories on VJ about scam "victims", I noticed a lot of them seem to be Older US Citizens (significantly older, 20+ years age gap) and young Beneficiary. Oftentimes, these ppl never met in person, or met online, had a quick "relationship" and quick decision to get engaged or married. I also noticed a lot of these USCs also seem to have a fetish for a particular ethincity of girls (ie. asian, filipina, chinese, etc...)
A lot of these USC also seem to be financially challenged for their age (ie. low salary by American standards for someone 40+ years of age). So to sum these USCs up: they are old (& probably ugly due to their age), poor, stupid (so dumb as to believe that a young pretty girl would want to marry them after a few meetings online) and fetishists. So basically, they are lousy "catches" in America. Which girl in their right mind would want to marry these losers?
So these beneficiary girls are trading off their youth, beauty, and leaving behind their family and friends...to marry a loser USC? Some take their "trade off" seriously and fulfill their end of the bargain and are genuine in trying to make the marriage work. Others are "scammers" who don't like the trade and run as fast as they can once they get their green cards. But can you blame them? Why would a young, beautiful girl want to stick with a loser USC?
Or am I being too harsh?

you have two choices. be smart: i.e. show respect and comply, or be a smart ###. in this country, where law enforcement is being shot at and the average education level of the beat cops is high school diploma. you got to make a decision which way you want to behave suits you best. You might go to your local video rental.store for a copy of Rambo in the VHS section for future reference. cheers.

all that can be answered by hiring a PI and save you a trip and embarassment for showing up unannoused. stop touturing yourself and find out the truth.

That is a sad sorry ### of a reply from a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. You should get a hold of the NYT reporter for a follow up story to expose the incompetence and deception of a government agency working for you. I looked into this thread just to check on your status. Wish you best of luck

That's a typical misleading and bureaucratic double talk again. The statement passed the responsibilities to the local service centers and failed to monitor their progress and resources needed. NSC is by far the slowest one in adjudicating stand-along apps. It is the failure of the top USCIS leadership to devise a fair and equitable system to process ALL applications in the order of their receipt. Simply shuffling apps around and not ensure the apps are reviewed and adjudicated in a orderly fashion is just a smoke and mirror tactic.

My main issue with this whole process is:
In the name of clearing backlog, a good number of April apps were transferred to Nebraska in mid November only to be stuck there again while later cases transferred to other centers leapfrog over them. That is incompetence of USCIS, at best, or a deliberate diversion at the expenses of these people. To add insult to injury, after clearing NVC's backlog, they are approving apps from May and June now. So the April filers got shafted twice! Those who transferred to NSC got swept under the carpet so that as a whole USCIS is making progress in moving the process time along. What a jib!

My main issue with this whole process is:
In the name of clearing backlog, a good number of April apps were transferred to Nebraska in mid November only to be stuck there again while later cases transferred to other centers leapfrog over them. That is incompetence of USCIS, at best, or a deliberate diversion at the expenses of these people. To add insult to injury, after clearing NVC's backlog, they are approving apps from May and June now. So the April filers got shafted twice! Those who transferred to NSC got swept under the carpet so that as a whole USCIS is making progress in moving the process time along. What a jib!