Jump to content

22 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Until your passport is clear of the mark for registered sex offenders you will be blacklisted from countries bullied by the United States. (Albeit bullied with good intentions)

 

Your passport is marked until the Supreme Court overturns the law(which has a good chance but not a guarantee) or you are removed from the Sex Offender Registery.

You will always fall under the AWA unless the law is resended or you receive a full pardon and your record expunged.

 

There are many SO who no longer register living abroad in countries black listing RSOs.

The government is prevented from sharing a person's detailed criminal record to other countries with the exception of international crimes. Hence the mark on the passport of RSOs.

The intention of the law was to allow the US government track these individuals not hinder their travel. However,  the US government wanted other countries to track or allow our law enforcement authority to track within their country,  which any sane country would consider ludicrous. Hence people were black listed and the weakness of the law.

If you previously lived in the Philippines or your spouse is there you can petition the Philippine Government for conditional entry to be reviewed on your merits. While the Philippine Government may seem confusing to us and currently aggressive towards criminals they are much more family oriented and willing to give a person a chance to move forward with their lives. The Philippine people are emotional and will not forget but they will allow forgiveness.

Edited by evli1966
Grammar_ spelling
Posted

Thank  you, my passport is currently not marked. But I did read that the US is moving forward to revoking all previously issued passports to RSO's. My wife is moving back to the Philippines in April, do you know who she should contact regarding this issue or should we be looking for an attorney to assist us? i would live on a deserted island to be with my wife, we just want to be together. Anything you can advise us would be greatly appreciated. Thank you 

Posted
On 2/28/2018 at 6:34 AM, Hank_ said:

Adam Walsh is a different critter that running a business in the Philippines.   To get off the black list I think he would need to get off the Adam Walsh list.

International Megan's Law 2017.  RSO are now getting passports stamped when issued that they are an RSO.   Automatic blacklist to Philippines. 

2013/05/03 Married

2013 CFO seminar to change name

2013 Passport issued in married name

USCIS

2015/06/27 Sent I-130

2015/06/29 Priority Date

2015/0701 NOA1

2015/08/05 NOA2

NVC

2015/08/17 Package received at NVC

2015/08/26 Received DS-261/AOS bill

2015/08/29 Sent AOS/IV

2015/08/31 AOS/IV scan date

2015/09/01 DS-260 submitted

2015/09/21 3 n/a (CC)

2015/09/28 Receive confirmation email of CC waiting interview date

2015/10/01 Interview date scheduled (P4)

Manila Embassy

2015/10/12 SLEC Medical, required to get doctor certificate and return the 30th.

2015/10/19 Went to hospital to get the doctors certificate for SLEC

2015/10/30 Appointment with doctor at SLEC for evaluation

2015/11/03 Completed medical

2015/11/05 Interview scheduled - APPROVED

2015/11/06 CEAC changed to issued

2015/11/11 Passport and visa delivered

2015/11/12 Passport stamped at CFO

Filed: Other Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

...  and someone else mentioned there is a bill in motion to remove that "label" from the passport,  but I doubt it would remove them from the database established by Adam Walsh.

 

Adam Walsh Act has caused people to be blacklisted in the Philippines long before 2017 

 

The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act is a federal statute that was signed into law on July 27, 2006. ... requiires publicly disclose information of Tier 2 and Tier 3 offenders, at minimum. It also contains civil commitment provisions for sexually dangerous people.

Hank

"Chance Favors The Prepared Mind"

 

Picture

 

“LET’S GO BRANDON!”

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

AWA has not prevented me from entering and returning 4 times a year since 2008, not sure were you got your information.

I do believe the black list began with US putting pressure on tracking individuals that are or were currently registering.

The Megan's Law requires those registering to have their passports marked.

Hence designation RSO registered sex offender, SO sex offender that isn't required to register for whatever reason.

But back on track to the topic.

 

I do not know but starting at her local baranguy may be a start.

Filed: Other Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
5 hours ago, evli1966 said:

AWA has not prevented me from entering and returning 4 times a year since 2008, not sure were you got your information.

I do believe the black list began with US putting pressure on tracking individuals that are or were currently registering.

The Megan's Law requires those registering to have their passports marked.

Hence designation RSO registered sex offender, SO sex offender that isn't required to register for whatever reason.

But back on track to the topic.

 

I do not know but starting at her local baranguy may be a start.

My information came from a person that had previously traveled to the Philippines only to be denied entry on a later trip, finding that he had been black listed (before Megan ).

 

 

Hank

"Chance Favors The Prepared Mind"

 

Picture

 

“LET’S GO BRANDON!”

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
4 hours ago, Hank_ said:

My information came from a person that had previously traveled to the Philippines only to be denied entry on a later trip, finding that he had been black listed (before Megan ).

 

 

Very possible, the US was trying to force other countries to track these individuals well before the IML.

But it was my understanding that thise still on the registry were denied access...

Also anyone regardless of registering or not that was there currently and employed or providing a legal living with themselves wss allowed to remain unless they got in trouble. I know a few still living there with their families.

 

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...