Senators oppose Iraq troop boost

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Hmmmm....

Three leading US senators have announced agreement on a resolution to oppose US President George W Bush's plan to increase troop numbers in Iraq.

The group - two Democrats and a Republican - said the plan was not in America's interests, urging an early transfer of security to Iraqi leaders.

The move came as Democrats - who control Congress - began their own initiatives to block the deployment.

But the White House said Mr Bush would continue to proceed with his plan.

Under the new strategy announced last week, Mr Bush wants to send more than 20,000 additional troops to Iraq, the majority of them to violence-hit Baghdad, in a bid improve security and end sectarian clashes.

'No support'

The three senators behind the non-binding resolution are Democrats Joseph Biden and Carl Levin, and Republican Chuck Hagel, a long-standing critic of the war.

Support is not there for the president's policy in Iraq - the sooner he recognises that reality and acts upon it, the better off all of us will be

Sen Joseph Biden

"It is not in the national interest of the United States to deepen its military involvement in Iraq," the resolution said.

"The United States should transfer, under an appropriately expedited timeline, responsibility for internal security and halting sectarian violence in Iraq to the government of Iraq and Iraqi security forces," it said.

Sen Biden said that the US presence in Iraq could only be sustained with support from Americans and the backing of Congress.

"Support is not there for the president's policy in Iraq," he said. "The sooner he recognises that reality and acts upon it, the better off all of us will be."

The BBC's James Coomarasamy in Washington says that the resolution would have no legislative effect, but would offer a way for like-minded senators to express opposition to Mr Bush's plan without having to take steps that could expose them to accusations of endangering American troops.

Democrats also stepped up efforts to thwart Mr Bush.

Sen Christopher Dodd introduced a bill that would require congressional approval for any troop increase in Iraq, while in the House of Representatives, a bill from three Democrats called for the withdrawal of US troops within six months.

Sen Hillary Clinton talks with US forces during a recent visit to Kabul

Senator Clinton's remarks come as the US presidential race hots up

And a potential candidate for the Democrat presidential nomination, Sen Hillary Clinton, said she opposed the escalation and called for a cap on US troops in Iraq.

But the White House continues to argue that Congress has little room for manoeuvre since funds for the president's proposed troop increase have already been approved, our correspondent says.

'Get a lot worse'

Mr Bush, meanwhile, spent the day holding meetings with sceptical Republican lawmakers in a bid to shore up support for the deployment.

White House spokesman Tony Snow said the congressional resolutions would not affect Mr Bush's thinking.

"The president has obligations as a commander in chief," he said. "And he will go ahead and execute them."

On Tuesday, Mr Bush defended his plan in a televised interview, saying that the US had to up its engagement in Iraq so that the violence there did not "spiral out of control".

"If we don't help them stop, it's going to get a lot worse," he said.

In Iraq on Wednesday, at least 15 people were killed and more than 30 injured in a suicide car bomb attack at a busy market in the Shia district of Sadr City.

The attack came hours after at least seven policemen and civilians died when a lorry exploded near a police station in the northern city of Kirkuk.

On Tuesday, more than 70 people died in double bombings at a university in a Shia district in Baghdad.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6273217.stm

Edited January 18, 2007 by erekose

[pedroh 21]

yea i also saw Mr tony snow saying 'if we don't do it, osama will be happy, and do we want osama happy or sad?' #######?

and condie saying 'it's not an increase, it's an augmentation'.. more #######..

jon stewart ftw..

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

and condie saying 'it's not an increase, it's an augmentation'.. more #######..

It's marketing-speak, which infests mainstream US politics - as though people can only understand ideas by turning them into a slogan or tinkering with the presentation to make the 'same old' appear fresh and new.

No surprise when so many US politicians have backgrounds in, and/or significant financial interests in corporate America.

Edited January 18, 2007 by erekose

[Lurker 0]

Politics ≠ Military

[one...two...tree 2,762]

yea i also saw Mr tony snow saying 'if we don't do it, osama will be happy, and do we want osama happy or sad?' #######?

and condie saying 'it's not an increase, it's an augmentation'.. more #######..

jon stewart ftw..

I can't believe the audacity of the White House to continue using Bin Laden as their token boogie man when they've shown absolutely no effort in capturing him....so yeah, #######?

[Thingee 0]

Sigh..you know, I know it's in advance..but I'm already dreading the '08 race as it's going to focus 80% on who's to blame in Iraq. Yes, it's an important issue(obviously), but there are other equally important issues that aren't going to get the attention they should because of this. What it boils down to I suppose is that it doesn't really matter who made the mess, it needs to be cleaned up, and THAT should be the focus as opposed to the blame game. There's no easy fix on this one...one he!! of a bottle of milk has been spilled. Bush saying 'I'm sending more troops--don't care who doesn't like it.' meets congress saying 'Oh no you aren't, cause we aren't gonna let you.' isn't going to fix a $%^#@*& thing.

Politicians(on both sides) just irritate me these days.

[Robor007 0]

Bush's plan doesn't make sense to a majority of them so of course they're going to oppose it. Before the election in 2006 Bush had a rubber stamp on everything he wanted to do and he was very brash to those who opposed him. Well, because he's done a pi$$ poor job the Rep's lost control of both the House and Senate and they're going to throw it back in his face. I for one am enjoying it. If I saw W I'd say two words to him... Lame Duck.