Connie Fogel plans "protest" against "North American Union"

[Saddle Bronc 124]

...EGADS, look it's the Amero

Well you get the idea, anyway!

A more apt picture would be that of Myron Baloney (physique in suit not markedly different, only chin lots longer, hair greyer), since the original FTA (precursor of NAFTA) was his idea (of course, along with failed Mooch Lake Accord and G0uge-and-$crew-tax).

[peejay 327]

There are quite a lot of Americans that are disgusted with the Bush administration, Corporate America, and the US Chamber of Commerce's open border agenda. Nobody really wants this sh*t crammed down our throats except for the so called elites in America that will undoubtedly enrich themselves enormously at the expense of everyone else. And Mexico wants it more than any because of their "basket case" economy and Third World poverty. Their agenda pretty much remains to dump their poverty and unemployment across the border to the USA and get as much capital rolling south as possible.

It doesn't sound like such a desirable arrangement for the vast majority of Americans (or Canadians). But Corporate America and their lackeys in government are salivating at the prospect. The first salvos in this agenda was the Bush administration's aggressive long standing policy to actively undermine enforcement of laws against illegal immigration and workplace enforcement.

You would think that the role of our government should be to encourage an American economy that serves the needs of the American people. Sadly, our government is and has been selling us out. Yes, we have the best government that money can buy. Just look at the US Senate's "comprehensive immigration reform" legislation S.2611. It was Corporate America and the US Chamber of Commerce's wet dream come true.

I'm sure that Canadians feel the same way about the motives of their government too. It just plain stinks to high heaven.

A North American United Nations?

By Congressman Ron Paul, 8/28/2006 12:52:50 PM

Globalists and one-world promoters never seem to tire of coming up with ways to undermine the sovereignty of the United States. The most recent attempt comes in the form of the misnamed "Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America (SPP)." In reality, this new "partnership" will likely make us far less secure and certainly less prosperous.

According to the U.S. government website dedicated to the project, the SPP is neither a treaty nor a formal agreement. Rather, it is a "dialogue" launched by the heads of state of Canada, Mexico, and the United States at a summit in Waco, Texas in March, 2005.

What is a "dialogue"? We don't know. What we do know, however, is that Congressional oversight of what might be one of the most significant developments in recent history is non-existent. Congress has had no role at all in a "dialogue" that many see as a plan for a North American union.

According to the SPP website, this "dialogue" will create new supra-national organizations to "coordinate" border security, health policy, economic and trade policy, and energy policy between the governments of Mexico, Canada, and the United States. As such, it is but an extension of NAFTA- and CAFTA-like agreements that have far less to do with the free movement of goods and services than they do with government coordination and management of international trade.

Critics of NAFTA and CAFTA warned at the time that the agreements were actually a move toward more government control over international trade and an eventual merging of North America into a border-free area. Proponents of these agreements dismissed this as preposterous and conspiratorial. Now we see that the criticisms appear to be justified.

Let's examine just a couple of the many troubling statements on the SPP's US government website:

"We affirm our commitment to strengthen regulatory cooperation ... and to have our central regulatory agencies complete a trilateral regulatory cooperation framework by 2007."

Though the U.S. administration insists that the SPP does not undermine US sovereignty, how else can one take statements like this? How can establishing a "trilateral regulatory cooperation" not undermine our national sovereignty?

The website also states SPP's goal to "mprove the health of our indigenous people through targeted bilateral and/or trilateral activities, including in health promotion, health education, disease prevention, and research." Who can read this and not see massive foreign aid transferred from the U.S. taxpayer to foreign governments and well-connected private companies?

Also alarming are SPP pledges to "work towards the identification and adoption of best practices relating to the registration of medicinal products." That sounds like the much-criticized Codex Alimentarius, which seeks to radically limit Americans' health freedom.

Even more troubling are reports that under this new "partnership," a massive highway is being planned to stretch from Canada into Mexico, through the state of Texas. This is likely to cost the U.S. taxpayer untold billions of dollars, will require eminent domain takings on an almost unimaginable scale, and will make the US more vulnerable to those who seek to enter our country to do us harm.

This all adds up to not only more and bigger government, but to the establishment of an unelected mega-government. As the SPP Web site itself admits, "The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America represents a broad and ambitious agenda." I hope my colleagues in Congress and American citizens will join me in opposing any "broad and ambitious" effort to undermine the security and sovereignty of the United States.

Congressman Ron Paul is a Republican representing the state of Texas.

http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?f...51-f29a8b4a059c

Even our US Congressional Representatives are warning us about this sh*t. Unfortunately most of the clowns here on VJ are more concerned about the wellbeing of terrorists in US custody than they are about stuff that will really impact their lives. Wake up before it is too late. Or we will soon be living the Security and Prosperity Partnership of the Few at the Expense of the Many. And it will be around long after George Bush is out of the White House! Welcome to the Third World...coming to a neighborhood near you!

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

Again, why is canada important? snow? good weed?

[Mirorgate 0]

Again, why is canada important? snow? good weed?

Good Weed!

oh. and Oil Shale too.

Edited September 12, 2006 by Mirorgate