Jump to content

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

(Reuters) - German renewable industry lobby BEE said on Wednesday it would be able to supply 47 percent of German power requirements by 2020, joining a debate on how to replace nuclear generation capacity.

The lobby, which groups 22 individual units representing wind, hydro, solar and biomass-to-power producer interests, said it could offer a high share of reliable renewable supply.

"Renewables could be ready to provide 47 percent of German power supply up to 2020. This way they would not just compensate for the nuclear withdrawal (meant to happen by 2021 at the latest) but in addition offer affordable and sustainable power," the group said.

Last year, renewable power supplied 17 percent of German electricity output of 585 billion kilowatt hours, while nuclear generation accounted for 23 percent, industry data shows.

Germany's government said on Tuesday it would shut down seven nuclear power plants that had begun operating before 1980 at least until June, leaving open whether they will ever start up again after Japan's crisis.

It also has to decide whether to go back to an 11-year old program to close down all 17 of its reactors or to extend the operating life of some of the younger plants beyond what was laid down in the original agreement. It had ruled to extend nuclear lifespans last autumn.

While the situation is in flux, Germany must draw up new plans on how to secure its future electricity supplies.

Power sectors based on coal, gas and renewables have so far been shy to present their merits, because they do not want to appear as winners of the negative publicity for nuclear that has been caused by the Japanese disaster, observers say.

The standard argument against renewables is their volatile production levels. BEE said an expansion could cure that problem, but could not happen as long as Germany is oversupplied with thermal capacity.

"In 2007, up to six nuclear reactors were out of action at one stage (due to summer heat), but Germany still had one of its biggest power export surpluses that year," it said.

Continuing nuclear operations will hold back renewables from coming to full play by 16 years, BEE said.

It also said it could offer combination plants that would balance out the volatility between various renewables but that the scheme had so far been ignored.

(Reporting by Vera Eckert, editing by Jane Baird)

http://www.grist.org...the-nuclear-hol

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted (edited)

What I don't understand is why everyone is freaking out about nuclear energy all of a sudden.

Japan had a friggin EARTHQUAKE and a TSUNAMI!!!

The last serious earthquake to hit Germany was in 1356, and it was a piddly 6.2 - a 1,000 times weaker than the one in Japan.

#######?

Edited by mawilson
biden_pinhead.jpgspace.gifrolling-stones-american-flag-tongue.jpgspace.gifinside-geico.jpg
Filed: Timeline
Posted

What I don't understand is why everyone is freaking out about nuclear energy all of a sudden.

Japan had a friggin EARTHQUAKE and a TSUNAMI!!!

The last serious earthquake to hit Germany was in 1356, and it was a piddly 6.2 - a 1,000 times weaker than the one in Japan.

#######?

Merkel's party has been clobbered in recent state / local elections - they got much more of a shellacking in the city-state of Hamburg than the Democrats got in Nov 2010. They went from governing the city-state to having received I think it was less than 30% of the vote. thatw as the worst result they logged in this city-state in decades. There are more state elections on the calendar and Merkel's party is not looking good at all.

Now, the population in Germany has not been particularly fond of nuclear power for decades and Merkel's cabinet had not too long ago decided to extent the life of some reactors that were slated to be retired. This 180 she's doing right now is all politics - a desperate attempt to fend off some of the headwind her party is facing in the upcoming elections across the country.

It's sad to see her go out this way because overall she's been a very effective chancellor. I was quite sceptical when she first came to office. More often than not, she suprised me in a positive way.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...