Jump to content

30 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

There are no scapegoats. The facts speak for themselves.

What facts? That foreign-born workers gained jobs while native-born workers did not? I'm a foreign-born worker. As is my wife. And yet, we're both US citizens. Should I somehow get to the back of the line because I don't have a US birth certificate? Will your wife have to line up behind me as well? And the spouse of every VJ member? Is that what you're saying?

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: Spain
Timeline
Posted

Maybe some of those 'natives' should better qualify themselves for many of those jobs that are going to immigrants. Imperfect system and all, H1B jobs still are supposed to go through a domestic availability test for many positions.

Filed: Country: Belarus
Timeline
Posted

What facts? That foreign-born workers gained jobs while native-born workers did not? I'm a foreign-born worker. As is my wife. And yet, we're both US citizens. Should I somehow get to the back of the line because I don't have a US birth certificate? Will your wife have to line up behind me as well? And the spouse of every VJ member? Is that what you're saying?

I think the main point of the article was not to slam foreign born workers that are already here (excepting illegals), but to point out that it is bad policy to continue granting work visas when the job market does not warrant it. The example being the part I highlighted in red. I can't help it if that upsets you.

"Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave."

"...for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process."

US Congresswoman Barbara Jordan (D-TX)

Testimony to the House Immigration Subcommittee, February 24, 1995

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: Spain
Timeline
Posted

I think the main point of the article was not to slam foreign born workers that are already here (excepting illegals), but to point out that it is bad policy to continue granting work visas when the job market does not warrant it. The example being the part I highlighted in red. I can't help it if that upsets you.

For the most part the point you just made isn't bad policy.

Filed: Country: Belarus
Timeline
Posted

For the most part the point you just made isn't bad policy.

Why not? Importing foreign workers when US unemployment is high? Flooding the job market?

Why do you seem to believe that is good policy that benefits the vast majority of Americans?

Throwing out one liners just to disagree and then saying nothing else doesn't prove anything.

"Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave."

"...for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process."

US Congresswoman Barbara Jordan (D-TX)

Testimony to the House Immigration Subcommittee, February 24, 1995

Filed: Country: Belarus
Timeline
Posted

the point you just made isn't bad policy

isn't disagreement

One liners suck in that they are not clear. What exactly isn't bad policy? What exactly is good policy?

"Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave."

"...for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process."

US Congresswoman Barbara Jordan (D-TX)

Testimony to the House Immigration Subcommittee, February 24, 1995

Filed: Timeline
Posted
I think the main point of the article was not to slam foreign born workers that are already here (excepting illegals), but to point out that it is bad policy to continue granting work visas when the job market does not warrant it. The example being the part I highlighted in red. I can't help it if that upsets you.

If that was the point, then there's nothing upsetting about it. What's upsetting is that people can't properly express what they're allegedly trying to say.

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: Spain
Timeline
Posted

Why not? Importing foreign workers when US unemployment is high? Flooding the job market?

Why do you seem to believe that is good policy that benefits the vast majority of Americans?

Throwing out one liners just to disagree and then saying nothing else doesn't prove anything.

Indeed, am not in disagreement with you.

:lol:

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: Spain
Timeline
Posted

But perhaps considering that some of these visas are supposed to be used for high-demand positions that not all would qualify for based on background, education, etc...

And on the opposite side you have low-skilled visas too, and that's where you can definitely target and see if Americans are willing to spend 8-10 hours/day in the tomato fields on a seasonal basis.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
And on the opposite side you have low-skilled visas too, and that's where you can definitely target and see if Americans are willing to spend 8-10 hours/day in the tomato fields on a seasonal basis.

Supply and demand sets the price - this applies to the labor market same as any other. Them tomatos will be picked - maybe not as cheaply but they will be picked.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
I know I would have probably done it back in the day, but probably not most posters on this site would. Of course, I assume some things that may be more stereotypical than factual.

I've done all kinds of jobs growing up and working my way through high school, college and grad school. And I've worked with regular full time employees in some of these jobs that were just not up to doing other things - for a variety of reasons. There is always a workforce out there to work in what many might consider the less desirable jobs. An industry can increase and decrease the available workforce by - among other things - pushing the compensation up to increase the available pool of workers or down to decrease the available pool of workers. Yes, it's a bit more complex than that and there are other mechanism available and other factors at play but you get the idea.

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

What facts? That foreign-born workers gained jobs while native-born workers did not? I'm a foreign-born worker. As is my wife. And yet, we're both US citizens. Should I somehow get to the back of the line because I don't have a US birth certificate? Will your wife have to line up behind me as well? And the spouse of every VJ member? Is that what you're saying?

If you're a US citizen, how would they even know you're foreign-born?

I never had to show my birth certificate to anyone except USCIS and the passport office.

biden_pinhead.jpgspace.gifrolling-stones-american-flag-tongue.jpgspace.gifinside-geico.jpg
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...