White House evaluating TSA security methods Amid outcry over measures, TSA chief says only small percentage of travelers get body searches

[spookyturtle 9,466]

WASHINGTON — The White House says the government will take into account the public's concerns and complaints as it evaluates the Transportation Security Administration's tough new airline boarding security checks.

President Barack Obama's spokesman, Robert Gibbs, says the goal is to put in place procedures that maximize security and minimize invasiveness. He says those procedures will continue to evolve.

With the busy holiday travel season nearing, air travelers are protesting new requirements at some U.S. airports that they must pass through full-body scanners that produce a virtually naked image. Those who refuse to go through the scanners are subject to thorough pat-downs that include agency officials touching the clothed genital areas of passengers.

"We're going to look at how can we do the most effective screening in the least invasive way knowing that there's always a trade-off between security and privacy," TSA chief John Pistole said on NBC's TODAY show.

Pistole noted that those getting body searches constitute "a very small percent" of the 34 million people who have flown since the new policy went into effect.

He urged passengers unhappy with the policy not to "tie up people who just want to go home and see their loved ones." Some travelers have vowed to unleash a surreal spate of Nov. 24 disruptions just as millions of Americans fly off for annual family feasts.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano echoed Pistole's comments Monday, saying that few passengers receive pat-down searches and that minimally invasive searches must be weighed against security risks.

She says pat-downs are the only choice for those who decide they don't want to go through body scans or X-rays. She says that's because a security threat remains.

Napolitano appeared with Sen. Frank Lautenberg at an event at a New Jersey train station to warn travelers to be vigilant as they head into the holiday travel season.

'Refinement and adjustment'

As to whether the TSA would alter the security procedures, Pistole said he would go back to the Government Accountability Office, which conducted security tests last year, and find out if there was a way to modify the screenings.

The remarks echoed the sentiment of a statement issued Sunday by Pistole, who said, "there is a continual process of refinement and adjustment to ensure that best practices are applied."

Still, he pointed to the alleged attempt by a Nigerian with explosives in his underwear to try to bring down an Amsterdam-to-Detroit flight last Christmas. "We all wish we lived in a world where security procedures at airports weren't necessary," Pistole said, "but that just isn't the case."

The statement came just hours after Pistole, in a TV interview, said that while the full-body scans and pat-downs could be intrusive and uncomfortable, the high threat level required their use.

In the TV appearance, Pistole appeared to shrug off statements by President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton that the TSA would look for ways to alter screening techniques that some passengers say are invasions of privacy.

Obama said in Lisbon on Saturday that he had asked TSA officials whether there's a less intrusive way to ensure travel safety. "I understand people's frustrations," he said, adding that he had told the TSA that "you have to constantly refine and measure whether what we're doing is the only way to assure the American people's safety."

Clinton, appearing Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," said she thought "everyone, including our security experts, are looking for ways to diminish the impact on the traveling public" and that "striking the right balance is what this is about."

She, for one, wouldn't like to submit to a security pat-down.

"Not if I could avoid it. No. I mean, who would?" Clinton told CBS' "Face the Nation."

"Clearly it's invasive, it's not comfortable," Pistole said of the scans and pat-downs during the interview on CNN's "State of the Union." But, he added, "if we are to detect terrorists, who have again proven innovative and creative in their design and implementation of bombs that are going to blow up airplanes and kill people, then we have to do something that prevents that."

Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., who is set to become Transportation Committee chairman when Republicans take over the House in January, differed with the approach.

"I don't think the rollout was good and the application is even worse. This does need to be refined. But he's saying it's the only tool and I believe that's wrong," Mica, a longtime critic of the TSA, said on CNN.

With the peak traveling season nearing, air travelers are protesting new requirements at some U.S. airports that they must pass through full-body scanners that produce a virtually naked image. The screener, who sits in a different location, does not see the face of the person being screened and does not know the traveler's identity.

Those who refuse to go through the scanners are subject to thorough pat-downs that include agency officials touching the clothed genital areas of passengers.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., appearing on CBS, said Congress would hold hearings on the "very controversial" issue of how to strike the right balance. Asked how he would feel about submitting to a pat-down, Hoyer said, "I don't think any of us feel that the discomfort and the delay is something that we like, but most people understand that we've got to keep airplanes safe."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40312411/ns/travel-news/

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

"We're going to look at how can we do the most effective screening in the least invasive way knowing that there's always a trade-off between security and privacy," TSA chief John Pistole said on NBC's TODAY show.

Got two words to guide that search: Ben Gurion.