What if there is NO drug conviction in the past

[ChazAZ 0]

My fiancé admitted to a one time drug incident in her past. We have waited the the three year period. We received a letter stating that attending a drug education class was optional. Has anyone received this? We were told to return after the mandatory three year period (which ended February 28th) to be re-considered. Our case remains open. She did not test positive on her urinalyses and has never used drugs since or before. She tried one line at a party and that was it. To show rehabilitation what needs to be shown? It is unreasonable for her to check into rehab #1 Associated Costs. 2.) TIme. She must work 6 days a week at her job. She has two children to support on an income of an equivalent of $100 per week income. How can she check into rehab if she has a family to attend to with no other means of support this is ridiculous. We have thought extensively and researched this dilemma at great lengths to try and find out the letter of the law in this matter. It seems to come down to an opinion of a person behind the desk as to whether or not the applicant is telling the truth. Again, no conviction, no charges, clean urinalyses. Not an addict. When we return we plan to keep the story the same as it is the truth and see what happens - what do we expect? If is a ridiculous assertion that she is a drug addict. A one-time admitted use from February 2007.

Edited April 17, 2010 by ChazAZ