rbv_shard

OP has at least four options: 1. US citizen visits Canada, marry in Canada, apply for spousal visa (starting with Form I-130), move to US. Begin work on arrival. 2. Canadian visits US, marry in US, return to Canada, apply for spousal visa (starting with Form I-130). move to US. Begin work on arrival. 3. Apply for fiance visa (starting with Form I-129F), marry in US, stay and adjust status. Need to apply for and receive employment authorization before working. In all three cases, visits in both directions are possible while waiting for the visa, and the end result is permanent residency 4. Canadian gets accepted by a US university which will provide an I-20 certificate, register with SEVIS. Move to US, go to school. If you decide to get married in the US, you can afterward apply for spousal visa or adjustment of status and you don't have to return to Canada while waiting (but you do have to stay in school, not work, until the process is finished). If you don't get married, this path doesn't lead to working in the US, but it differs from the other marriage-based routes in that you can be continuously in the US through the long process. I wouldn't recommend the fiance visa for a Canadian, since visits are fast and cheap compared to adjustment of status. But it is an option.

You appear to be claiming that anyone who enters on a single-entry visa is immediately undocumented and subject to removal, which just isn't the case. The foreign fiance is admitted for 90 days and is issued an I-94 to prove that (for proof, go print it from the website). Fully entitled to travel within the US until the end of the 90 days, fully documented. A single-entry visa, like K-1, can't be used for a second entry, but the entry is documented and the approved length of stay is fully legal, anywhere in the USA. Domestic travel is allowed on the basis of the valid unexpired entry, there is no need to still be holding a visa.

How would they see information that's not provided until after the visa is used to enter the USA, (AOS application or home visits)? As you correctly said, they see what USCIS has seen, past tense, not what you disclose to USCIS later in the process (like OldUser's example: descriptions of being intimate in a genuine marriage). As an example, consider Benghazi. Some of the locals were incredibly loyal and valiantly died trying to protect the US ambassador.... while others mysteriously chose not to show up for work that day. Second example: Pakistan. The stringent screening to work for the US wasn't considered good enough background check to issue visas to come to the USA when American troops pulled out. Result was that a lot of very good people got left behind and murdered. I am definitely not saying that all or even a large number are criminals, but it only takes one to cause a ridiculous amount of trouble. And beside the staff working in the embassy, any documents carried to the interview are at risk during travel to/from the embassy. Thanks for the "correction", but there's only upside to being circumspect about including non-public records. When it comes to vital statistics, like birth and marriage certificates of parents, those are public anyway, bring them all.

There's a big difference between providing the information to USCIS and putting it in the hands of non-US staff at the embassy. Corruption levels vary wildly around the world and some countries don't prosecute (or investigate) identity theft.

On your birth certificate, which box does "Stephanie" appear in? Is it in the "last name"/"family name"? It sounds like you have two different last names, matching each parent, used alternately not together (at least, none of your documents use them together, correct? If you try to string together both on a new passport it's just as likely to make your problem worse not better).

I put everything in a manila envelope, with the photos in ziploc bags (separate for passport photos from proof of meeting/relationship). Now, I haven't received NOA2 yet, so I guess it's possible that was an invitation for them to lose half of my evidence, but bureaucrats in the US usually do not lose stuff on purpose.

Reminds me of a application for visitor visa to Uganda (mission trip). They ask where you're going to stay -- name of accommodation, address, and phone number -- to be filled into a single blank. But it will reject if there is not exactly one comma. (And you are not told, either in advance or when it is rejected). I tried so many variations, moving the post code before and after the city, leaving the postcode off, leaving the phone number off, until I finally discovered the required format.

Maybe use screen sharing remote control software, so the website can be open in a web browser on your computer (where it works), but she can be the one to actually push the button.

Were you a US citizen when they were born? They're probably US citizens already, in which case you don't need any visas for them, no I-130. Instead you should be getting CRBA filed (this recognizes the citizenship that already attached to them, it does not change their citizenship) and apply for US passports for the kids.

No experience with that, but I know people who got busted on drug tests outside the immigration context: Did she actually stop using or has she been gaming the tests? If she stopped 12 months ago, it shouldn't come up in a new medical. If she's been using in between tests, then it's very possible that the medical exam picks it up even when routine tests didn't. Good luck! I hope she loves you enough to quit a destructive and illegal habit.

Just want to add that there are some "entanglements" that don't create joint ownership and therefore are safer to pursue prior to marriage. For example: emergency contact HIPAA sharing authorization beneficiary of insurance and/or financial accounts (sometimes called "transfer on death" or "POD") credit card authorized user All of these can be changed again unilaterally and most do not require a social security number

Hopefully you meant "simple" in the English sense (not complicated) and not in the legal sense. A simple power of attorney would lose effect just when you need it -- when the signer dies or becomes incapacitated. You at least want a "durable" PoA. I am not a lawyer and for that sort of document you definitely should have one.

You meant to speed up CR-1 right? I was under the impression that K-1 and K-3 have no overlap -- the first can only be used prior to marriage, and the other only after marriage. Just the paperwork is largely the same...

Congratulations on entry!

Here is the official list (USCIS links to it): https://www.cdc.gov/immigrant-refugee-health/hcp/civil-surgeons/vaccination.html#cdc_generic_section_10-table-1-vaccine-requirements-according-to-applicant-age-for-civil-surgeons The 18-64 years column applies to you. If you cannot find records of childhood Tdap vaccination, then you need at least 3 doses spaced out over a few weeks. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-notes.html#note-tdap

I've been told that Texas service center only does other visa types, not K-1. My I-129F is being processed in California and I live in Texas.

And yes, get it before the wedding, because the K-1 visa expires upon marriage.

The numbers right now in VJ trackers are about 6 months longer for CR-1 vs K-1 (current NOA2 are being sent for June 2024 for CR-1 and for Dec 2024 for K-1). Result is K-1 gets the beneficiary into the US faster, but CR-1 gets the beneficiary a green card faster. Don't let anyone twist your arm into thinking CR-1 is better than K-1. Give due consideration to both, understanding the process for each and then make a decision about what's best for your situation. For my fiancee and I the K-1 was a significantly better choice, we filed in February and our estimate for NOA2 is October.

There is a US embassy in Mozambique, but it says "pause on non-immigrant visas", so NVC may indeed have sent the case to South Africa for the interview. https://mz.usembassy.gov/visas/ It's not clear why that would be, nor whether K-1 is included in the pause. Mozambique is not on the latest group of countries where non-essential travel is being denied. You said both petitioner and beneficiary are Venezuelan. Venezula IS on the ban list, and if the US government is not accepting official documents from Venezula, then your friends may have a problem. I'd chase down whether their birth certificates, background checks (will be needed from Venezuela and all countries of employment including Mozambique), and other vital records are even going to be accepted before arranging beneficiary's travel to Johannesburg. Having an interpreter definitely seems like a good idea because the document check has high potential to get very complicated. This isn't a DIY situation. There is probably no hope of success considering the ban looks at nationality, not residence or where the interview takes place. It's also probably worth asking for a review of the full document list (don't post copies of the documents, but e.g. title, issuing agency, and date of issue for each one is important information). Do they have dates set for document review, medical exam, embassy interview? How fast is the document review approaching?

Couples that follow the tradition of one breadwinner, one homemaker don't necessarily need work authorization (if the USC is the breadwinner). Yes, I know that's very last century, but it's what the K-1 is designed for, and that's reflected in other ways too (such as needing evidence of approval of families). In such a situation the faster arrival in the US means less time supporting separate households and less travel, which can make the K-1 more cost-effective in total despite the higher fees. (That does assume that K-1 is faster processing than CR-1, which is not guaranteed and varies with agency priorities, but for traditionalists, having that processing overlap with the engagement period also is a benefit)

You need to understand that this is completely wrong. Immigration is under jurisdiction of the federal government, and marijuana is banned under federal law. It doesn't matter if state and local officials turn a blind eye to it. Coming from a high risk country, the two of you need to avoid any possible problem. He needs to stop using, urgently, and stay clean after his arrival in the USA. Even residue of marijuana smoke on his clothes or luggage could cause scrutiny that you really don't want.

Have you checked what the minimum enrollment at your university is for full-time status? It may feel wasteful if tuition is the same for 12 credits or 18, to take only 12, but you may find it practical to maintain enrollment while working.

Yes February 2025 filing here, not a peep from USCIS yet. But I see that December filers are getting NOA2 now. If you create your timeline, VJ will predict when your NOA2 comes.

The one time inside the US you must assert your single status is when applying for the marriage license, and most places they'll just take your (written and signed) attestation. But if you already have such a document, bringing it when applying for the marriage license is certainly a good idea.