S2N

The only, and I do mean only, anecdotal evidence we have of K-3s skipping the line are for people who are already assigned to the Texas Service Center before they file the I-129F for K-3. I’ve seen a few approvals come through from there after K-3 that make me scratch my head. As TX is where you mail the K-3 application to, I can buy that they might have a practice of reviewing I-130s already assigned to them when they get a K-3 in the mail in order to make their numbers look better (they get to kill two forms with one stone, etc.) If it’s any of the other service centers I’m with @OldUser; it’s at best a waste of time and at worst it takes time away from someone in TSC reviewing other I-130s.

She’s going to Ciudad Juarez for her IR-1 interview because people who did not present themselves for inspection can’t adjust status. They have to return to the consulate in their home country and get an immigrant visa and then present themselves for inspection to a CBP officer in order to become LPRs. This is the standard operating procedure, so OP doesn’t need to worry about any of that. Agreed with this. TSA doesn’t care about enforcing immigration laws, even in the current environment.

She needs a valid reason: either being a Thai citizen or resident. My gut is she’s neither since you said another third country. If she isn’t, she can’t interview there.

There is no need to include anything more than the three years asked for. Even the 2022/2023 dint require transcripts. In your case I think there’s a decent argument to upload the 2022/2023 transcripts to show income was consistent with when you filed single, but it’s not required by any means. I wouldn’t upload 2021.

OP has already applied for an ITIN so won’t have transcripts for about 5-6 months. Solution here is the 1040 plus W-2/1099s.

Your CPA should have given you a copy of your 1040 for 2024. That and all W-2s/1099s that support it should be fine.

VJ estimate isn’t great if they’re accelerating catching up on a backlog — gives you the current speed more than anything, which I agree is around 14.5-15 months right now. If you look at the public data and approvals they got through April in 2-3 weeks, and April has roughly the same population of I-130s of all the following months. If they keep up that processing speed, you’re looking at getting back to 11-12 months. Its way to early to tell, but it looks like things are trending positive.

Thanks, wasn’t sure the best location and the IR-1/CR-1 timelines seemed most natural. Thanks for moving Yes, was discussing standalone I-130s which are now processing at one month every 3 weeks give or take.

Not sure if this is the best place to post it, but what are people’s thoughts on the likelihood that the median case time is trending towards 12 months? They processed April in approximately 3 weeks before starting on May. All months since then have been roughly equal or less in application size. If they continue at that rate, they’ll start January 2025 the last week in December. Kinda hard to believe since we were at 17 months median when people in January filed; but the math is what it is.

As a data point: we renewed the ESTA tonight since we had no travel planned before his current one expired and to avoid any hikes with the inflation adjusted schedule next year. Approved within 90 minutes with a pending I-130. Not exactly travel, but hopefully useful for anyone considering ESTA either for the first time or as a renewal after the petition.

It’d be easier to give a more helpful answer if you provided details rather than discussing a hypothetical case.

You’d do enrollment on arrival in most cases. In OP’s wife’s case they’d most likely process her VWP admission, take her biometrics for GE, and send her on her merry way.

Unless it’s changed since when I did it (could have), there’s an in-person enrollment that they call an interview, but they don’t really ask any questions and they scan your passport, take your picture, and take your fingerprints. I was under the impression that was most people’s experience. Did they actually ask you guys questions?

The “interview” is handing them her passport and getting fingerprinted. There’s no actual interview.

I prefer Argentine wine, oddly enough, but I usually bring a few Chilean países back since they’re next to impossible to find here and some of the cabs that are harder to find that I like as well. I do bring pisco back as well because I am a huge fan of Chilean piscos. The conversation in MIA always goes like: Me: I’m bringing back 4 bottles of wine and 2 piscos. 3 liters of wine and 2 of pisco. Worth around $100 total. MIA CBP officer in the GE line: [blank stare for 10 seconds trying to process that I’m talking and not walking], okay. DFW GE line is: Me: [Same as above] DFW CBP Officer: I SAID YOU’RE GOOD TO GO. YOU NEED TO KEEP WALKING (actual quote.) Those quantities are technically taxable but they’re never going to charge you duty on them since it’d be too much work for like $7. Still have to declare though because if you don’t they could revoke global entry for not declaring a taxable amount of alcohol.

At MIA when I declare the wine I bring back they look confused and wave me through. At DFW they yell at me and get mad at me for declaring and tell me to move to keep the GE line moving. Always declare, but I find the reactions funny.

USCIS sometimes screws up and issues a two year green card when they should issue a ten year one. The CBP officer you met was correct, they’re supposed to compare your date of entry to the documents they have and make the determination, but they don’t always do it correctly. It’s not a huge deal if they do — you just file a free I-90, but that takes a while and most people would prefer to have the correct physical green card as proof of status vs an IDIT. The reason a lot of people request CBP admit as IR-1 at the POE is that USCIS is less likely to make a mistake if the class of admission reflects IR-1. CBP can do it if they want, but some POEs don’t. It’s nothing to make a fuss about, but it also doesn’t hurt anything and removes a potential point of error for USCIS.

And sometimes the tests are inconclusive and require getting revaxxed anyway. Since Colombia has it all for free, I’d just get the shots if it was me. All a personal choice, though.

Correct, the worst case is they charge you $200 for something that would otherwise be free and approve you.

My suggestion is to get them done before going to the medical — the consulate doctors in many countries are notorious for up charging on vaccines vs. the public clinic. If you do it before they should be fine. Many people do it day of at the doctor for an overpriced fee. That’s the worst case. Based on my quick read of the local Bogotá government website (Spanish language) women aged 18-49 get all vaccines free at government sponsored vaccination stations. She can do this before the exam.

Sounds like you’re doing everything right and have competent professional advice. Go with what they say. Sorry you faced a lot of skepticism initially here. Your circumstances aren’t cookie cutter but what you’re doing is clearly allowed within the current U.S. immigration system. It’s just not all that common for someone to file an I-130 and let it sit at NVC for a long time in order to reunite with your kids in the U.S. once you’re ready to retire (or whenever, but you get my point.) Its a super smart strategy though that will significantly shorten the time once/if you guys are ready, and it seems like you’re getting a lawyer who is planning for your long-term success, which is good. Best of luck. If you have any questions about more practical stuff that it wouldn’t make sense to check with the lawyer about, we’re here. Also if you just want to check in overall If you take one piece of our advice here: have her apply for global entry now and do enrollment on arrival on her first trip. It’ll make the future trips much easier.

Reading through the post history here that @JeanneAdil mentions, I’m guessing that this is likely a case of USCIS delaying in hopes you eventually withdraw the petition. Background checks likely wouldn’t be an issue causing delay in Hungary. Keep the pressure on them through multiple avenues, but I could easily see this case ending in filing a writ. It checks a lot of boxes for red flags based on the history, but there’s also no clear grounds to deny. Those are the cases (in any agency, not just USCIS) that the government tends to just not act upon. Give them two years: hopefully it doesn’t come to that, but give them that. Once that happens, contact a lawyer about filing a WoM.

Contact both senators and your congressman. USCIS will give them a non-answer but it will force it to be looked at. Feel free to stagger inquiries with Congress-critters and senators so that it keeps annoying them. You’re outside of the 17 month 80% window, but USCIS doesn’t consider something outside of normal processing times until 90% are passed. If you don’t hear back by December file a writ. The congressional inquiries will help you with this as it will show the court/US attorney that you have been trying to find a resolution. I don’t see any benefit in inquiring with them directly even when it’s taken so long. They have no accountability outside Congress or the courts and while I don’t mind giving them the benefit of the doubt up to two years, it’s a well known strategy within the federal space that agencies never deny things they don’t want to approve but is in a grey area, as that gives a right of appeal. They just delay until you give up. Bringing in outside accountability and they actually take action.

Yah: the substantial presence rule plus MFJ might screw over the foreign earned income exclusion. Or even his wife being there more than 30 days. Filing is definitely required but this falls into complex tax situation even within the already complex expat tax realm. I’m pretty decent with taxes but this type of stuff would need a CPA who is familiar with people living between two countries. Like you said, hopefully OP has one, but you’d be surprised the things people don’t tell their accountants until the IRS or a regulator comes knocking.

Correct, and it’d trigger tax repercussions. But ESTA does give the right to request this, even if CBP can say no at any time. 30 days in/60 out wouldn’t likely trigger questions since it’s less than half the year. You’d still have to be careful on tax treatment even of that, though.